Crystal L. Cox - Investigative Blogger Exposing Corruption and Fraud on the Courts

Spiritual Abuse Oregon: Is Pastor Chuck O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church Guilty of Spiritual Abuse? Does Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church really respect the First Amendment and the Rights of those who come to Beaverton Grace Bible Church to hear Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church's Sermons? The Case of Pastor Charles O'Neal / Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church suing a woman over EXPOSING Pastor Charles O'Neal / Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 24 May 2012 01:40:00 +0000

Spiritual Abuse Oregon: Is Pastor Charles O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church Creepy, is this Oregon Church a "Cult" ? Do Ex Church Members of Beaverton Grace Bible Church have a Constitutional Right to their Opinion and to Tell their True Experience at Beaverton Grace Bible Church?

Here is the Controversial Blog Exposing the Tactics of Pastor Charles O'Neal / Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church written by Ex member of Beaverton Grace Bible Church.

http://bgbcsurvivors.blogspot.com/

It sure seems to me that Pastor Charles O'Neal / Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church  has been defaming this ex church member for years.

Did Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church tell members of Beaverton Grace Bible Church to mistreat this woman or her family in any way? How many years did Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church bad mouth, gossip or pressure members to act in any certain way regarding this one woman? Is this not intimidation? harassment? defamation?

Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church sued a woman, a blogger, over expressing her opinion of Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church, and telling her true experience regarding what was happening to her as a member of Beaverton Grace Bible Church.

Does anyone have a right to their Opinion of Pastor Charles O'Neal's or of Pastor Charles O'Neal's Church Beaverton Grace Bible Church ? Or will you be sued by Pastor Charles O'Neal / Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church, if you express your opinion or experience regarding Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church?

Does the Constitution apply in the State of Oregon? Is Free Speech in Oregon just for those who the Oregon Courts say Free Speech is for? Do Constitutional rights apply at the Beaverton Grace Bible Church in Oregon?

Is Pastor Charles O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church Creepy, is this Oregon Church a "Cult"? Do you have a legal right to believe or express your experience with Pastor Charles O'Neal's of Beaverton Grace Bible Church?

Pastor Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church has no issue preaching hate against classes of people.  Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church seems pretty narcissistic and self righteous to me, in my Opinion.

Does Charles O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church use Spiritual Abuse tactics to keep member coming to Beaverton Grace Bible Church ?

Julie Anne Smith of Oregon has a the right to post her experience with Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church . And the right to post facts as best she can, in order to help other Oregon residents from having the same bad, damaging experience as she had with Pastor Charles O'Neal and Beaverton Grace Bible Church.

It sure seems like Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church used Spiritual Abuse practices. Shunning is Cruel at best. It is Creepy and it does seem to be a tactic of Cults. She chose to leave the teachings of Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church and the Sermons of Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church  and she was defamed, discriminated against, shunned, lied about, treated badly and Pastor Charles O'Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church seem to have no remorse, no accountability.

Member of the congregation of Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church have a right to speaks out by BLOG. It is their Constitutional Rights, and this certainly is a Free Speech issue and a moral issue.

Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church and Julie Anne Smith in the News.

Pastor Charles O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church has been accused of being a cult, of being "creepy", and of using control tactics, as well as spiritual abuse. Is this a true accusation of Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church ? Is what happens at the Beaverton Grace Bible Church of public concern? Is Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church a public figure? Did Julie Anne Smith have actual malice? Will this Oregon Judge rule that actual malice is irrelevant?

Beaverton Grace Bible Church Survivors Blog

http://bgbcsurvivors.blogspot.com/

Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church, Oregon Non-Profit Sues Ex-Church Member

Beaverton Grace Bible Church and Pastor Charles O'Neal's SUES Oregon Woman for

Telling the TRUTH.

Signed by
Chuck O’Neal aKa Charles O'Neal
Pastor
Beaverton Grace Bible Church

Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church Image Source
http://imgur.com/TSWtf

More on the Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church Complaint
http://bgbcsurvivors.blogspot.com/2012/05/chuck-oneals-complaint-against-julie.html

Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church Complaint Says "What we had was indoctrination...That is how cult leaders work. Don't waste your precious lives and relationships by being held emotionally/spiritually captive at this so called church."

It goes on to say "...how can she forget that her own beloved pastor knew about a sex offender in the church who had access to the nursery and children on a weekly basis and did not have any safeguards in place."

And it says... "This is a very destructive and disturbing "church"... The extra Biblical legalistic teaching is wrong. The gossip/slander, disclosure of what goes on in private counseling sessions, sex offenders having free reign in children's areas with no disclosure to parents... This is not a safe place."

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church in the News.

Research Links to Beaverton Grace Bible Church, Pastor Charles O'Neal's Church

Beaverton Grace Bible Church Sues an Oregon Woman for her Opinion, based on her True Experience of Pastor Charles O'Neal's Church and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/15/beaverton-grace-bible-church-oregon-family-bad-review_n_1518399.html

http://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=beaverton+grace+bible+church

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/16/11698334-oregon-mom-sued-by-church-over-online-criticism?lite

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/05/oregon-church-sues-ex-members-over-online-criticism/

Charles O'Neal - Charley W. O'Neal swears to statements being of fact and true, and accurate.. hmmm..
http://bgbcsurvivors.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2012-03-15T17:24:00-07:00&max-results=7&start=67&by-date=false

Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church

Some Quotes and Links To Blogs, Sites Regarding Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church

"One of the weirder things about Chucks decision making process is his love of Rev. John MacArthur. Rather than associate and consult with pastors in his area, Chuck phoned MacArthur’s church and was counselled by one of MacArthers staff pastors to sue. Chuck’s explanation:

DEFAMATION IS A CRIME: Pastor Chuck O’ Neal, his wife, his children, and Beaverton Grace Bible Church as a whole, have suffered JulieAnne’s hateful lying slander for well over three years. After seeking counsel from a pastor on staff with Grace Community Church (under Pastor John MacArthur) and reading him several excerpts from JulieAnne’s endless defamation, he recommended that we FILE A LAWSUIT in an appeal to Ceasar as the Apostle Paul did when falsely accused of crimes against God and the state. The lawsuit has been filed in the Washington County courthouse. "

Source of Above Quote Regarding Pastor Charles O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church
http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2012/05/13/beaverton-grace-bible-church-pastor-sues-former-parishioner-for-google-reviews/

Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church defames and spews hate regarding classes of people, and he seems to inspire his congregation to shun those who no longer which to follow Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church or shall I say "tithe" to Pastor Charles O'Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church. Yet Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church says Defamation is a Crime, when it comes to people talking about him.

Did anyone at Grace Community Church give legal advice, guidance or their opinion to Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church ? Or is that defamation, gossip? They Seem to Say that is NOT True? So did Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church lie about that or was Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church mistaken? Here is what Grace Community Church Pastor John MacArthur Says.
http://bgbcsurvivors.blogspot.com/2012/05/macarthurs-statement.html

It is assumed that Beaverton Grace Bible Church is a Tax Exempt non-profit in which Oregon Tax Dollars pay for in a way and of course the Tax Status alone makes Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church a Public Figure and of Public Interest, right?

What is the damage to Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church really? Maybe the Truth according to real experiences of Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church's congregation will cost him "tithing", and the free will of Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church's congregation to think for themselves.

In my Opinion it is seriously on the wrong side of the moral compass to "shun" those who choose, by free will to leave your church and to "worship" God in their own personal way. Every individual has a right to their own personal relationship with God and this has nothing to do with who the "tithe", who they follow or what church they are loyal to or not. It is WRONG to mistreat, single out, encourage shunning of individuals who leave a particular church or pastor for their own personal reasons on their own person, unique, sacred quest for spiritual enlightenment and a stronger personal relationship with god.

****

More From the Blogsphere, Regarding Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church

"Pastor Charles O’Neal, Beaverton Grace Bible Church, Does He Have A Screw Loose?… You Might Want To Decide!… I Have Decided!… Screwdriver Anyone?…
May 14th, 2012 | Author: Chuck Slowe"

Full Blog Post and Quote Source Regarding Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church
http://chuckslowe.com/?p=37077

Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church Press Release Statement from Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church.
http://thewartburgwatch.com/pastor-chuck-oneal-press-release/

Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church Research Links

"Yes, here’s that precious “religious liberty” the radical religious right is crowing about. So much for “turn the other cheek.”

Smith wrote a negative review on Google of her church, calling it a “cult.” Later, she started a blog, Beaverton Grace Bible Church Survivors."

"“Julie Anne Smith revealed on her blog in March that Pastor Chuck O’Neal and Beaverton Grace Bible Church had sued her for $500,000 over negative reviews on Google and DEX that claimed that she had been shunned for no reason,”

"The Beaverton Grace Bible Church has on its website an extremely offensive anti-gay hate letter, titled, ”HOMOSEXUAL PROLIFERATION –AN OPEN LETTER.”

The letter seems to compare homosexuality to “rotten fruit,” and falsely claims it “causes incontinence, disallows procreation, and very often goes hand in hand with substance abuse, pornography use, and child molestation.”

One Site Comment from Pastor Charles O’Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church Article Above:

"We have been controlled and abused by our religions for thousands of years. I congratulate Julie for having the guts to speak her truth and expose the human rights offenses that have been justified in the name of religion. How can these religious leaders call themselves Christian when their hearts are clearly filled with hate and greed? Religious freedoms exist to believe as we choose, not to abuse as we choose"

Source of this Pastor Chuck O’Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church Article
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/religious-liberty-woman-learns-criticize-the-church-the-church-will-sue-you/discrimination/2012/05/18/39742

The Pastor Chuck O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church Site Says

"In Nov. of 2008 a man was removed from the staff of Beaverton Grace Bible Church (BGBC). Since that time, Pastor Charles O’Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church have been the targets of a three and a half year campaign of defamation by a group of former church members and attenders who are close personal friends of the former staff member. The church elders and the pastor did little to defend themselves over these three and a half years, believing that the individuals would tire of the effort and eventually cease the defamation.

However, that did not prove to be successful. In fact it was counter-productive. The defamation campaign escalated recently when one of the former congregants established a blog on the internet with the intent of reaching a broader audience. This divisive group has used review websites, blogs, the police, the Department of Human Services, and now the local media in their three and a half year campaign to destroy Pastor O’Neal and Beaverton Grace Bible Church with false accusations that range from ridiculous to criminal."

Source of Beaverton Grace Bible Church, Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church Statement
http://www.beavertongracebible.org/statement.html

From the Beaverton Grace Bible Church - a Personal Not from Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church

" A personal note from Pastor Chuck: It has been my privilege to pastor Beaverton Grace Bible Church for over twelve years. As an American patriot and a Christian pastor I staunchly support our First Amendment rights. As a husband, a father, and a pastor I stand by my right and the right of every American citizen to defend themselves, their families, their churches, their secular organizations, and their businesses from World Wide Web Internet assaults consisting of false criminal accusations and character assassination of the worst kind."

Source of Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church Quote
http://www.beavertongracebible.org/

I say this is not sincere. In my Opinion Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church wants to squash First Amendment Rights and Free Will of those who attempt to leave his RULE, his Power and Control, his Spiritual Abuse.

In my Opinion, Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church wants to keep members at his church whatever "tactic" it takes and that Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church is not standing behind those defending their family in their way.

For Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church to sue a mother and daughter for speaking out about their experience at the church of Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church, well this is NOT in support of people defending themselves

******

BEAVERTON GRACE BIBLE CHURCH PRESS RELEASE:

*Things are not always what they first seem to be. Here is a portion of the rest of the story.

In Nov. of 2008 a man was removed from the staff of Beaverton Grace Bible Church (BGBC). Since that time, Pastor Charles O’Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church have been the targets of a three and a half year campaign of defamation by a group of former church members and attenders who are close personal friends of the former staff member.

The church elders and the pastor did little to defend themselves over these three and a half years, believing that the individuals would tire of the effort and eventually cease the defamation. However, that did not prove to be successful. In fact it was counter-productive. The defamation campaign escalated recently when one of the former congregants established a blog on the internet with the intent of reaching a broader audience.

This divisive group has used review websites, blogs, the police, the Department of Human Services, and now the local media in their three and a half year campaign to destroy Pastor O’Neal and Beaverton Grace Bible Church with false accusations that range from ridiculous to criminal.

The facts will show that this is not a free speech case. As the campaign of defamation has escalated the postings on the internet have falsely accused Pastor O’Neal of being a “wolf,” a “liar,” a” narcissist” "

"After three and a half years of suffering a great many injuries tamely, without stirring for our own relief, we are now using lawful means to right the ministry of the Gospel at BGBC and to protect our families."

Source of Above Quotes and Full Statement from Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church Website
http://www.beavertongracebible.org/statement.html

Pastor Chuck O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church

What happened with Pastor Charles O'Neal and with Beaverton Grace Bible Church That is what happens when people leave many churches. They are defamed, harassed, and shunned by former friends and family. This happens for years, and if someone speaks out, then the church seems to think they will eventually tire and go away, the thing is this is real people with real lives and the Truth and their experience should matter and should not be silenced. Those reading the "review", the "experience" of one member are smart enough to do their own homework and make up their own mind. Silencing a blog is not going to change the True experience of this one individual.

Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church wants to control his "Flock" otherwise  Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church would encourage them to get the opinion of other's and still decide to stay based on free will and person choice and not on Spiritual Abuse tactics.  Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church seems to think the members of his church cannot think for themselves and they will just believe what ever they read and not do their homework.

Why is it so important to Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church to silence one woman who had a bad experience? I believe it is because Julie Anne Smith speaks the truth regarding  Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church and  Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church does not like the truth being told regarding Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church.

Where is the law in protecting the individuals right to talk about their experience and to warn others so that the same thing does not happen to them. Why is Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church so arrogant that Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church wants to protect his family yet has no accountability to what Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church  has done to the family of those who attempt to leave his church?

Yes, if an innocent man was accused of being a sex offender and Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church is accused of knowing and letting this happen, well yes this is wrong. And if not true, yes maybe an injunction, a retraction request and certainly proof that either the man is a registered sex offender and Pastor Charles O'Neal /Pastor Chuck O' Neal  of Beaverton Grace Bible Church knew or not.

Did Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church knowly let a sex offender have "access to the nursery and the children on a weekly basis " or not? The Facts Speak for themselves really.

If this man was falsely accused of such a horrible act, then 3 years ago would have been the time to address that specific issue. As far as name calling, opinion, one members experience, well that is certainly a Free Speech issue.

However accused Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church of being a wolf, a liar, a narcissist, well that certainly is opinion and free speech. And kind of narcissist for Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church to sue and ex Beaverton Grace Bible Church member for calling it how it certainly "seems" to be.

More regarding Pastor Charles O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church In the Blogs

"Let me get this straight, Chuck.

Former members of your church wrote negative reviews online starting sometime in 2009.

(Which few people actually read.)

Instead of seeking counsel from a pastor in your local area,

or….. I don’t know following Matthew 18, Chuck, you call some unnamed pastor at Pastor John MacArthur’s church, in California?

I can’t wait for the pastor of MacArthur’s church you allegedly called to be deposed. If this case get’s that far, that is. I have a little idea who we will find was doing the defaming.

Julie Anne started this blog in February 2012 because her negative reviews had been removed from Google.

I don’t know you, Pastor Chuck, in my opinion, you’re an idiot. Are you going to sue me too?

While you contemplate suing, do you know what the “Streisand Effect” is?"

Source of the Above Regarding Pastor Charles O'Neal /Pastor Chuck O' Neal  of Beaverton Grace Bible Church.
http://chucklestravels.wordpress.com/2012/05/13/beaverton-grace-bible-church-files-suit-against-former-members/

******

Statement from John MacArthur/Grace Community Regarding Charles O'Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church suing an Ex-Member
http://bgbcsurvivors.blogspot.com/2012/05/macarthurs-statement.html

Latest Court News on Pastor Chuck O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church
http://bgbcsurvivors.blogspot.ca/2012/05/court-news.html#comment-form

Link to One Blog Regarding Review and Experience of Pastor Charles O'Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church “Beaverton Grace Bible Church Survivors.”

The Truth is the Truth Regardless of what you Believe.

A Few More Research Links Regarding Charles O'Neal's

and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church

Pastor Chuck O' Neal , Beaverton Grace Bible Church Tips on how to find a Good Church
http://www.beavertongracebible.org/HowToFindAGoodChurch.pdf
Does Charles O'Neal's, Beaverton Grace Bible Church Follow all of these?

Pastor Chuck O' Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church Statement of Faith

" STATEMENT OF FAITH

I. We Believe In A High View of God God is absolutely sovereign in all things. The church is established and exists for His glory alone. God is directing and working all things after the counsel of His own will (1).

II. We Believe In A High View of Scripture. Because the Bible is the Inspired, Infallible, and Inerrant Word of God in the original language passed down to us without change, it is the absolute and final authority on all matters (2).

III. We Believe In the Preaching of Sound Doctrine. Maintaining a high view of God and a high view of Scripture necessitates the preaching, teaching, and practicing of sound doctrine (3). Doctrine always precedes duty.

IV. We Believe In Personal Holiness. Though we are in the world, we are not of the world. We are accountable to God and to each other for what we do and how we live, for we have been bought and are not our own (4). We belong to Christ.

V. We Believe In Spiritual Authority. God Himself has established order in every area of our lives, and the church is no exception. God in Scripture has clearly given us the structure of authority for the church. Christ is the head of the church and He mediates His rule through the shepherding of godly elders (pastors)

(5). These elders (pastors), having a high view of God and Scripture, being devoted to the preaching, teaching and practicing of sound doctrine, and being examples of personal holiness before the congregation, are responsible to lead the church. The Bible teaches that the congregation is accountable to the elders (pastors) and that the elders (pastors) are accountable to God. Therefore, all decision-making authority is vested in the elders (pastors), who shepherd the church (6)"

Source of Beaverton Grace Bible Church, Pastor Chuck O' Neal Statement of Faith
http://www.beavertongracebible.org/statement.html

Beaverton Grace Bible Church, Pastor Chuck O' Neal Statement of Hate Toward Millions
http://www.beavertongracebible.org/blog.html

Charles O'Neal's, Beaverton Grace Bible Church Tax Information Coming Soon

Pastor Charles O'Neal's, Beaverton Grace Bible Church Background Information Coming Soon

Some of the non-Taxable ways that Pastor Charles O'Neal's of Beaverton Grace Bible Church seems to make money, other then "tithing" of course.

http://www.livingwaters.com/index.php?option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=199
It is assumed, that you go to Pastor Charles O'Neal, Beaverton Grace Bible Church website and you get to buy this stuff Retail and Pastor Charles O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church makes non-taxable money.

More ways that Pastor Charles O'Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church seems to make money coming soon.

Lots More indepth investigation, following the money, background, and every detail of Pastor Chuck O' Neal and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church. Not Defamation, but factual information to the best of my abilities to turn up.

If you have a tip regarding Pastor Charles O'Neal's or the Beaverton Grace Bible Church, please email your Pastor Charles O'Neal's or the Beaverton Grace Bible Church tip to me Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger researching in depth, Pastor Charles O'Neal's and the Beaverton Grace Bible Church.

SavvyBroker@yahoo.com

Here is some information on more Oregon Defamation Cases in the Last Year. Including Mine.

Dr. Jerry Darm Sued Tiffany Craig in Washington County Oregon, it was Dismissed.

http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/the-1-million-twitter-fight/Content?oid=4525873

http://www.lakeoswegoreview.com/news/story.php?story_id=131846187125548900

http://www.katu.com/news/local/128428913.html

http://bloglawblog.com/blog/?p=3492

Here is the Subject Post
http://www.criminallyvulgar.com/2011/06/dr-darm-and-missing-medical-license.html

Higher Balance LLC Plaintiff V. Quantum Future Group Inc., Quantum Future School, Signs of the Times and Laura Knight - Jadczyk. Chief Judge Ancer Haggerty.

Remember Ancer Haggerty was the Original Judge in Obsidian V. Cox and he was removed with no reason. Judge Marco Hernandez, the Judge that took the case over, is connected to Judge Michael Simon who was with Perkins Coie Law Firm and represented some of the Creditors in the Summit Bankruptcy that I was Exposing the Details and Fraud on the Bankruptcy Courts. The Laws in Oregon ONLY seem to apply when your NOT a blogger exposing those within the Justice System of Washington County Oregon.

Higher Balance LLC Plaintiff V. Quantum Future Group Inc. Chief Judge Ancer Haggerty Opinion
http://quantumfuturegroup.org/HBI_Case_Documents/Sott_opinion_revised.pdf

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/171246-Happy-Winter-Solstice-We-Won-

Crystal Cox Blogger Sued for Exposing Top Law Firms, Judges, DOJ Employess, Financial Companies and CPA Firms - was not allowed to use Anti-Slapp Laws, Retraction Laws and was not allowed to have actual malice be a factor.

Links to Research the Case of a Blogger sued Out of Oregon Federal Courts for exposing the inside secrets of a $40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy Case

http://www.obsidianvcox.com/

http://www.youtube.com/user/WhistleblowerMedia

http://www.citmedialaw.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2012-01-11-EFF%20Amicus%20in%20Support%20of%20Cox%20Motion%20for%20New%20Trial.pdf

Obsidian V. Cox Trial Transcripts
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117800653/Obsidian-V-Cox-Trial-Transcripts

In The Crystal Cox Case, the Oregon Retraction Laws nor the Oregon Anti-Slapp Laws Applied.
Blogger Crystal Cox was not asked to remove the blog post that cost her a 2.5 Million Dollar Judgement and years of her life to stress by the Plaintiff, and their Attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp who knew full well of the facts of the Summit Bankruptcy and was involved in the alleged corruption that Crystal Cox Blogger was exposing.

More Research Links

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/111075311/Exhibit-504-Oregon-Anti-Slapp-Laws

http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/31.210

http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=2852

A Final Note Regarding Pastor Chuck O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church

Shunning is Wrong, Immoral, Indecent, Cruel. All individuals have a right to express their opinion and to share knowledge they personal experience or come across. We have a right to warn others and make the world a better place. Knowledge is Power, Knowledge is Sacred. The Constitution Applies to us all, Even those of us who Expose Attorneys of the Elite Oregon Attorney Fraternity.

****

Spiritual Abuse Oregon: Is Pastor Chuck O'Neal's Church, Beaverton Grace Bible Church Guilty of Spiritual Abuse? Does Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church really respect the First Amendment and the Rights of those who come to Beaverton Grace Bible Church to hear Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church's Sermons? The Case of Pastor Charles O'Neal / Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church suing a woman over EXPOSING Pastor Charles O'Neal / Pastor Chuck O' Neal of Beaverton Grace Bible Church.

The State of Montana has Covered up Rapes in Many Montana Counties for Years. The Montana Attorney Generals Office, Montana Governor, University of Montana, Montana ACLU, Montana Department of Justice and More have Known for Years.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sun, 06 May 2012 22:03:00 +0000

In 2009, A Group of Us Tried to Recall Sheriff Anderson in Lincoln County for Failure to Prosecute Rapes, this Launched a massive retaliation against me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. All because I gave voice to rape victims that Montana County Attorneys FAILED to Prosecute, Over and Over.

Click Here for One Article from Eureka Montana. If you Need details, contacts, cops to talk to, or information to do the right thing and bring Montana County Attorneys to justice, Email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Click Here for Kootenai Valley Record Story of Rapes at that Time. The Summer of 2009, when we ran a Montana Sheriff Recall in Lincoln County Montana, and we were in a Documentary on Corruption in Missoula and Hamilton Montana, this is when My University of Montana Stalker First Started attacking me. He was protected by Ravalli County Justice of the Peace Robin Clute and then Ravalli County Attorney George Corn. Also the University of Montana Police Jim Lemke protected him, and so did the Missoula Police Department. ( I have Posted emails with Detective Jamie Merifield and the U of M Police Jim Lemke)

Click Here for the When is a Victim a Victim in Montana Article from that Time Period

Letter from Chief Justice Gray of the Montana Supreme Court, Click Here, This Letter was to the Lincoln County Recall Committee and signed by Christine A. Wethern, Staff Attorney.

Keep in Mind Folks, the Recall out of Lincoln County Montana in the Summer of 2009 was because of a huge amount of unprosecuted rapes. This Sheriff Recall was initiated by Diane Kaechele, a brave smart woman, not from Montana who said Rape is Wrong, and set out to do something about it. Many strong Montana Residents such as Rex Nichols, Paul Stramer, Ginny Emerson and more stood up with Diane Kaechele for these victims. No Authorities in the State of Montana listened to the cries, the voices of these victims. Still we fought for them as hard as we could, with the tools we had.

Click Here for the Letter from the Division of Criminal Investigations
This was written in the Fall of 2008, as this brave woman spoke out to Montana Agencies for Help and NO One was Listening. This is addressed to Diane Kaechele, Lincoln County Recall Committee and Signed by John L. Strandell, Investigations Chief. It is from the State of Montana Department of Justice, Division of Criminal Investigation.

The Montana DOJ knew that Rape was an issue and they have for many years. Still Steve Bullock, Montana Attorney General Protects the Montana County Attorneys such as Missoula County Attorney Fred Van Valkenburg, Ravalli County Attorney George Corn, and Bernie Cassidy of Lincoln County Montana.

Click Here for Letter from the Montana Attorney General's Office to Diane Kaechele of the Lincoln County Recall Committee. This is From Attorney General Mike McGrath, State of Montana.

Click Here for Letter from Brian Schweitzer Office of the Governor, State of Montana to Diane Kaechele Spokesperson, Lincoln County Recall Committee. This is signed by Chief Legal Counsel Ann Brodsky, she suggests that the Montana Attorney General is contacted and as you see above, they suggest something else. And you can see that this Letter is copied to the Attorney General Mike McGrath.

After all of this, and no help what so every. Diane Kaechele, Spokesperson for the Lincoln County Recall Committee, Sent this Letter to the Montana ACLU in Missoula Montana. It was December 30th, 2008.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/120137571/MontanaACLULetterRegardingMontanaRapes

Below is the Letter to the Editor from Sean Boushie, in the Daily Interlake, Kalispell Montana, Sunday 7-19-2009. This was the begining of his 3 year hate campaign, while at work at the University of Montana. I rebutted this letter on my blog about the recall, as the concealed carry topic was not factual and the Recall was mainly about the Rapes in Lincoln County, it was about un-prosecuted Rapes. To ask people not to sign this massively important recall that involved over 40 rape victims, was simply, in my opinion wrong.

This rebuttal set off 3 years of Hate, and the Lincoln County Sheriff, Lincoln and Ravalli County Attorney, Judges in Libby Montana and Hamilton Montana, the Montana Attorney General, Montana Highway Patrols, many Montana Commissioners, Missoula Montana Police and the University of Montana all supported a massive 3 year, every day attack on me, Blogger Crystal Cox who was writing on the rapes. Judge Robin Clute in Hamilton Montana gave Sean Boushie a Protective Order Against me, that was NOT Mutual and Sean Boushie attacked, stalked and threatened me that whole year and still to this day. Judge Haynes in Hamilton Montana denied me a protective order. This was after I received a Death Threat on August 6th 2009, in which Bernie Cassidy, Lincoln County Attorney still refuses to investigate.

Here is Sean Boushie's Original Letter to the Editor.

The Now Eureka Police Chief Ian Jeffcock, was there during a rape scene investigation with another Eureka Cop, in City Limits, Bernie Cassidy County Attorney is said to have hidden the Truck with all the DNA evidence in it. Many local cops went to Ian's house over years, as he beat his wife, and the Eureka Cops protected him. Sheriff Anderson beat all 3 of his wives and the Libby Police Covered for Him. The State of Montana does NOTHING to protect victims of sexual and violent crimes in the State of Montana.

Sheriff Big Hair in Montana, I am told, raped many in Hardin Montana and he is protected.. here is one article on him.. http://www.kulr8.com/news/local/20901064.html

Ask Lincoln County Attorney Bernie Cassidy How 15 Felony Charges against Richard Brown turn into nothing, as he photos under age girls in his main street clothing stores restroom. He is said to be a local Drug Runner and Protected by Bernie Cassidy County Attorney, who refused to let Officer Caveretto search the residence of Richard Brown. Sex Crimes are protected by Montana County Attorneys. The Montana Governing Bodies knows and does nothing.

See this link below, it is a dead link, it use to be about the Montana Recall, but Lee Enterprises, the Missoulian Removed it to Protect Montana Corruption. All to Protect Rapists, why?
http://missoulian.com/articles/2009/06/17/news/local/news04.txt

DO Not Let Oregon Courts Silence Investigative Bloggers, New Media, the Free Press. Do Not Let the Oregon Courts Silence Online Journalists to Protect the Power Elite. The First Amendment, Shield Laws, Civil and Human Rights, and the Laws of the United States of America, ALSO apply to the State of Oregon. The Leroy Newton Story Reported by Tim King of Salem-News.com

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 05 May 2012 04:20:00 +0000

"Don't Let Oregon Courts Silence the Press

Tim King Salem-News.com

Salem-News.com goes to court for reporting a story about an elderly woman's fight to regain finances taken by her son.

Courtesy: owni.eu and Reporters Without Borders

(CLACKAMAS, Ore.) - An Oregon mother who allegedly lost more than a million dollars in property and assets to her son in California, says it's hard for a lone elderly woman to find justice in Oregon's legal system.

Now Salem-News.com is being called to task for publishing the story. The venue is the Clackamas County Courthouse and we will be there at 9:00 a.m. Monday morning.

Since the story was first published, Leroy Newton, who is in the investment industry in California, the only son of Erna Boldt in Sandy, Oregon, has been trying to make us purge the story, his story, with the help of a Portland attorney named 'Brooks F. Cooper'.

We are protected by the first U.S. Constitution amendment.

We believe that this legal threat is a frivolousa attempt to silence the free press for carrying a story that is embarrassing, for an individual sliding through legal loopholes with the help of a seasoned attorney. If the woman's allegations are true, then the legal system is failing to protect one of our most vulnerable citizens, and little else.

It seems preposterous that an individual could seize the assets in question from his elderly mother, and suspect that it would not draw media attention.

We find it equally puzzling that Leroy Newton and his lawyer decided to threaten and sue the media into silence without considering that this clear violation of our Civil Rights would likely become the grounds for a strong counter suit.

The article and video report on Erna Boldt in question are fairly presented and only portray the story according to Ms. Boldt and a wealth of accumulated documents. (see: Elderly Oregon Woman In Financial Ruins; via America's Worst Son? - Bonnie King Salem-News.com)

It will be interesting to see how this censorship attempt of Salem-News.com will really go. This is an important time for all in media, because a court interpretation of the 'truth' obtained through a court order that itself is in question, should never be allowed to silence us, particularly when the information is fully attributed to a named source.

One thing I am wondering about is whether attorney Cooper expected this case to end up in front of a jury, which it probably will. I suspect not, and that Mr. Cooper really should be more selective of his clients.

Interestingly, jurors aren't part of the 'system', and not exactly who a ruthless litigator can typically count on. In other words, the truth can win the day with the public and there is little these two men can do about it, and I really am excited about the prospect of being able to defend Ms. Boldt and our American Civil Right to free speech. That is what Mr. Cooper is trying to place his foot on top of, and I can only assume he has no idea what he is dealing with.

So far, Salem-News.com has had contact with two advocacy groups that we have dealt with for years; the Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters sans frontières (Reporters Without Borders) about this. The woman, Erna Boldt, is also being sued by her son for $55,000 more dollars to compensate him for what he's gone through.

Here's the story in a nutshell: Erna Boldt was born before the second world war, one more human being in a bad place, and her original home is Germany.

"Mom and Dad were bombed out in Hamburg," Erna said. "They fled to East Prussia where my Grandma and some aunts lived, they fled from there by foot, when the Russians advanced. Grandma and my aunts remained and were tyranized by the Russians."

By the very end of the war, when Erna was just 17-years of age, she found one alternative, and that was to follow her best friend's lead and join the German military. She enlisted in the Navy and served about three weeks, which was about enough time to have her photo taken and watch her fleet surrender to the allies.

British soldiers allowed Erna to move on with her life, and within a couple of years she met one of the many American soldiers sent to occupy the newly divided Germany. "My son was born in Germany, before I came to the States. He was 3 years old, when we landed in New York in 1952," Erna said.

It couldn't have been easy.

Today Erna still has her German accent and she is just as quick and funny and smart as any day of her life, but that didn't keep her son from convincing Oregon courts that she was incapable of looking after her own affairs. Court directives were not followed, and Erna lost everything.

"If only I had known!" Erna recalls with regret.

She didn't know of course, because Erna is not mentally diminished at all, as one can gather from watching the video below. Some of the supposed court orders against Erna have been carried out under shady circumstances and we have people looking into several parts of this which will be covered in future reports.

Erna's son is the character in this story who went to a lot of effort to take control of his mother's assets (before she died) that total over a million dollars.

Leroy Newton is the man Brooks F. Cooper chooses to represent the interests of. Erna worked hard and sent her son to Linfield College in Oregon, which is a private school. There he learned how to work with money, and apparently much more.

Erna explains that Leroy came to visit a few years ago from California, and when he did, he brought a friend. Erna didn't suspect anything, even when Leroy suggested he and Erna go to lunch because his "friend was tired and wanted to lay down". He and Erna went for lunch, while his 'friend', Erna says she later discovered, promptly began going through her personal files to find the information they would use in court to deem her incompetent.

Erna believes she earned the disdain of the Clackamas County court officials because, quite frankly, she can be pretty feisty, and who would not be?

There are no terrible stories of Leroy's childhood according to any of the parties we have contacted, or received contact from, and he had not been estranged from Erna until he took court actions against her.

Court documents show that Erna has seen a failure in cooperation from the Clackamas County court. Erna can produce documents demonstrating that they lost papers, failed to fulfill promises, and apparently just failed to fulfill their obligations to her as public tax paid servants.

I call foul on the whole thing, including these very questionable judge's decisions that allowed Leroy to clean up and Erna to lose in one of the most unforgivable ways ever imagined. Just because something can be done legally does not mean that it should be done.

Wrong is still wrong.

In the past, due to Cooper's legal wrangling, we had pulled the video, and we had actually done other things to try to comply with their wishes and demands, like remove the picture of him in a red Ferrari taken shortly after he got his mother's money. (We're assured by his daughter it was a rental car!) The final request was for Salem-News.com to pull the story from Google, which we are not capable of.

Now Erna is meeting Cooper in court again, a continuance of this seemingly endless and sad story. Our position is to get this chronicle of elder financial abuse out like never before. We do not want this type of thing to ever happen to our precious elder citizens.

With time, courts will be held at a higher standard and will be expected to take special care of the rights of the elderly. As it is, the judicial system claims that there are not enough attorneys or time to respond to every single claim. They have to take on the cases that they believe they can win. How pitiful that more "family" take advantage of their elders than any other group, those that are trusted the most, and without any consequences whatsoever. This must end.

Erna is impossible to dislike, unless you are working for a court that is playing games with attorneys, then apparently she can be much more difficult to work with. Why should she react any differently than any us would under the same circumstances?

On that note, are there any attorneys who feel as we do that this attack on us and our citizenry's freedom of speech is worthy of a large scale counter suit?

This suit is and has interfered with our ability to earn a living, affecting our reputation and our right to report the news without fear of reprisal. If you are an attorney and would like to discuss a contingency with Salem-News.com, we would like to speak with you. Email: newsroom@Salem-News.com

This story is not over. We will continue this report as each step takes place. Stay tuned. If we need additional support we will advise our readers, and all ideas are always welcome, my email address is below."

This is the video from the report: Elderly Oregon Woman In Financial Ruins; via America's Worst Son? - Bonnie King Salem-News.com"

Source of Post

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/october092011/worst-son-tk.php

Salem News. Click Below for Salem News Online Investigative Reporting

http://www.Salem-News.com/

Salem-News.com, Oregon Court Corruption, Fraud on the Courts, Clackamas County Courthouse, Leroy Newton, 'Brooks F. Cooper', Committee to Protect Journalists, Tim King, Oregon Judicial System, Oregon Courts, Oregon Defamation Lawsuits

Eugene Volokh Article on Freedom of the Press As An Industry, or For the Press as a Technology? From The Framing to Today.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:34:00 +0000

"“[T]he freedom . . . of the press” specially protects the press as an industry, which is to say newspapers, television stations, and the like - so have argued some judges and scholars, such as the Citizens United v. FEC dissenters and Justices Stewart, Powell, and Douglas.

This argument is made in many contexts: election-related speech, libel law, the journalist’s privilege, access to government property, and more.

Some lower courts have indeed concluded that some First Amendment constitutional protections apply only to the institutional press, and not to book authors, political advertisers, writers of letters to the editor, professors who post material on their websites, or people who
are interviewed by newspaper reporters.

Sometimes, this argument is used to support weaker protection for non-institutional-press speakers than is already given to institutional-press speakers. At other times, it is used to support greater protection for institutional-press speakers than they already get. The argument in the latter set of cases is that the greater protection can be limited to institutionalpress speakers, and so will undermine rival government interests less than if the greater protection were extended to all speakers."

..

"Of course, the Supreme Court has never limited itself to analyzing constitutional provisions based solely on historical sources. Justices remain free to decide for themselves what they think best serves the values they deem protected by constitutional provisions.

The goal of this Article is simply to say that an argument for a press-as-industry interpretation of the Free Press Clause must rely on something other than original meaning, text, purpose, tradition, or precedent."

Source of Quote and Full Eugene Volokh Article on Freedom of the Press
http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/press.pdf

Custody Order Violates First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:22:00 +0000

"In a Family Courtroom in Bucks County, PA, Judge Diane E. Gibbons recently ordered a father to take down a website, a blog actually, called: ThePsychoExWife.com. A portion of this site is dedicated to telling a story, based on true events, regarding a very contentious divorce and custody battle with this ex-wife. The purpose of the website was to attract others going through similarly difficult divorce and custody situations in order to help them manage theirs better. The Father, in this case, was ordered to shut it down under threat of incarceration and/or risk losing custody of his children.

Judge Diane E. Gibbons has violated the father’s civil rights by ordering him to remove the blog. Fact is, he neither owns the website nor the content. The existence of the website, in and of itself, has no affect on his children. It would forever remain so, provided both parents monitor the children’s computer usage as any good parent should."

You can read the full transcript of Judge Diane E. Gibbons orders here.

Source of Above Quote and lot's more on this Case Click Below
http://www.savethepsychoexwife.com/

Motion for Reconsideration
http://www.savethepsychoexwife.com/motion-for-reconsideration/

Emeritus News - Alternative News Source - Independent News Source

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:14:00 +0000

http://www.emeritusnews.com/

"Emeritus News is an independent, social enterprise, not affiliated with any other organization or business. Our focused selection of consumer and public affairs stories is designed for our time challenged followers, eager to be informed about the issues that matter most."

Source of Emeritus News Quote
http://www.emeritusnews.com/6553.html

Why was there no oversight of the actions of Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group in the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy? Why did Judge Randall Dunn answer only to himself? Research Kevin Padrick and the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy Yourself, Dig Deep.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:00:00 +0000

Look Deep into the Corruption I am exposing as this affects your Tax Dollars. Your paying for Bankruptcy Courts to conspire with Bankruptcy Trustees and squash the rights of victims.

Let's Take A Look Some More into the Summit Bankruptcy

Why did insider Stephanie Deyoung initiate her own FBI Interview
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=2852

Bankruptcy Abuse Protection Act? What a Joke.
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=2852

Why Stephanie Deyoung, and others dropped the Objection to the Fees
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=2451

Was there any Notable Anti-Trust Violations in these Videos ?
http://www.youtube.com/user/KevinPadrick
Remember, Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group is in the far right. Kevin D. Padrick was hired to advise Summit, to provide a plan of reorganization and was under signed contract with Summit to do so. Obsidian Finance Group was given $100,000 and took the spreadsheets, books, asset information, and more from the Summit Principals, owners, and Obsidian Finance Group, then used this information to get Kevin Padrick the job as the Bankruptcy Trustee which paid, allegedly around 6.2 Million Dollars more then the consultant job. Also note, last I looked in January of 2012, the Summit Bankruptcy was still open, this means the "Victims" aKa Exchangers, Creditors, Investors were still paying Kevin Padrick as of that time.

Where did Obsidian Go ?
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=655

Kevin Padrick Getting the Trustee Job
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=662

Also Listen to the Audio where Judge Randall Dunn pushes for "Obsidian" to be Trustee
http://www.anonymous-insider.com/media/090211.wma

Why did Kevin Padrick Really Reject Legitimate Offers?

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=684

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=2026

Who is Annie Buell, as Interviewed by the New York Times, in Relationship to the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal.

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1781

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1797

Check Out Summit Principal Mark Neuman's Depostion in the Summit Bankruptcy Case
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/101645262/Mark-Neuman-Deposition---Kevin-Padrick-Obsidian-Finance-Group---David-Aman-Tonkon-Torp

In the Summer of 2011, after the Obsidian V. Cox Lawsuit was filed, Homestreet bank accused Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group for similar conflicts of interest, ethics violations and over billing. This was similar and some the very same issues as the Summit Insiders had with Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, in their Objection to the Fees Filed.

Here is the Homestreet Bank Washington Objection to the Fees, Regarding Washington Company Yarrowbay and the Cascadia Project LLC.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tstf6BAeXFHFmMaFodmURp6uUDWm6U1SqeqBu2HgSvw/edit?hl=en_US&pli=1

Her is the Summit Bankruptcy Objection to the Fees of Tonkon Torp and Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group ( Keep in mind that Jeff Manning, Advanced Publication "the Oregonian" of Portland Oregon seemed to protect Kevin Padrick in the Media this whole time )
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/98076240/David-Aman-Tonkon-Torp-for-Obsidian-Finance-Group-Trustee-Kevin-Padrick

Kevin Padrick Response to Objection to Fees
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=2547

Exhibit F of the Objection to the Fees, Kevin Padrick, Tonkon Torp, Obsidian Finance
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=2547

Transcripts from Obsidian V. Cox Trial in Portland Oregon Nov. 29th 2011, where Blogger Crystal Cox asks very important questions under Oath to the Obsidian Finance Group Executives
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117800653/Obsidian-V-Cox-Trial-Transcripts

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney Portland was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy, and yet in a Conflict of Interest represented Obsidian Finance Group and Kevin Padrick in suing an Investigative Blogger that was getting the Summit Story heard.
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1808

David Aman, Tonkon Torp was an insider to the alleged corruption I was trying to get found in the search engines, yet in a conflict of interest is still harassing me to STOP the flow of information to the public regarding a very public issue, the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts.

A Few More Links Regarding David Aman and the Summit Bankruptcy

David Aman Check Your Facts
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1806

David Aman Communications
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1808

David Aman was involved in the harassment to get the infamous meeting videos off the internet
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1810

Here are the Videos on my Kevin Padrick YouTube Channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/KevinPadrick

David Aman, Tonk Torp Lawyer Deposed Summit Whistle Blower Stephanie DeYoung years before he was the Plaintiff's Attorney in Obsidian V. Cox, David S. Aman Portland, knew full well where the information was coming from and what the motive of Blogger Crystal Cox was and is. Yet David Aman did not contact me until more then 16 months later, when David Aman threatened to sue me in December of 2010.

Obsidian Finance Contract with Summit, Signed by Patricia Whittington for Kevin Padrick, both of Obsidian Finance Group Portland Oregon
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117384150/Obsidian-Finance-Group-Contract-with-Summit-Principals

More Kevin Padrick Pattern and History

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1845

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1848

Please note that the Jury only had one witness to go by in Obsidian V. Cox to allegedly prove the blog post was false, and this man, Gary S. used to work with Arthur Anderson, whom is being sued for Millions, and is under investigation by the FBI, SEC, DOJ and more regarding the stolen iViewit Technology, in which this same Investigative Blogger, Crystal Cox has been roaring about for years.

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://www.iviewit.tv/

I was not allowed to admit any EVIDENCE into the trial to prove the post was true. The one piece of Evidence I did get in, the Summit Contract, you can see in the Transcripts that Judge Marco Hernandez asked the Plaintiff's Attorney if he wanted to Object. I was Pro Se, this my first Trial and Judge Hernandez never asked if I wanted to object to anything.

Want any documents, audios, videos, proof? Can't find it on my sites? email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com or WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

More Research Regarding the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal

http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2012/03/summit-bankruptcy-objection-to-fees.html

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/

"Thing is there is no such thing as a response to a response to an objection to fees, but Kevin Padrick can get away with this in Judge Randall Dunn’s courtroom. By the way, if you have a problem with Judge Randall Dunn, you get to take that problem the the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Who is on that panel? Well, Judge Randall Dunn himself. So the Judge gets to monitor himself…WOW Really good checks and balance system, don’t you think?"

Source
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=2846

Open Letter to the Department of Justice
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=2005

Summit Bankruptcy Attorney Connections
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1832

I am Dedicated to Exposing Bankruptcy Corruption in the US Justice System

Also Check Out

Bankruptcy Corruption in the Petters Bankruptcy
http://petters-fraud.com/

Coming Soon Lot's More on Tonkon Torp and the Enron Bankruptcy, got a tip? SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com or WhistleblowerMedia@gmail.com

Crystal Cox Blogger

Anti-Corruption Blogger Crystal Cox Says, a Bit About the iViewit Technology Court Case. Crystal Cox regarding the Eliot Bernstein Story, and Justice for the iViewit Inventors

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 19:37:00 +0000

What if This was Your Invention, Stolen by the Patent Attorneys
that You Hired to get you a Patent?

More on the iViewit Technology Case

http://www.DeniedPatent.com/
http://www.iViewit.tv/

FBI, SEC Complaint, iViewithttp://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
http://www.investigativejournalist.net/2011/02/open-letter-to-time-warner-warner-bros.html Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, Open Letter to Intel Shareholders

http://www.investigativejournalist.net/2011/02/open-letter-to-intel-corp-board-of.html Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, Open Letter to Warner Bros. Shareholders

http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox Blog On Paul Otelline
Formerly CeoPaulOtellini.com
http://www.alexisdevane.com/ This Blog was Formerly KennethRubenstein.com
http://www.proskauerfraud.com/
http://ceopaulotellini.blogspot.com/
http://jeffreybewkes.blogspot.com/
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=498
http://www.investigativejournalist.net/2011/02/intel-corp-intc-press-release-on-mass.html
http://www.foley-lardner.com/
http://www.greenbergtraurigsucks.com/
http://www.proskauerlawfirm.com/ Formerly ProskauerSucks.com
Christopher C. Wheeler, Proskauer Rose Attorney
Formerly ChristopherCWheeler.com
http://christophercwheeler.blogspot.com/
Mathew Triggs, Proskauer Rose Attorney http://matthewtriggscom.blogspot.com/
Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Founder and One of the Inventorshttp://www.EliotBernstein.com/
Raymond Joao Proskauer Rose
Formerly RaymondJoao.comhttp://raymondjoao.blogspot.com/
http://www.scottsherr.com/ Scott Sherr Sony
http://www.toddoutten.com/ Todd Outten
http://douglaschey.blogspot.com/ Formerly DouglasChey.com

Crystal Cox Vs. Marc Randazza Attorney. Marc Randazza is Defaming Crystal Cox with "Actual Malice". Marc Randazza is Flat Out Lying, Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 08:51:00 +0000

Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher Attorney, Randazza Legal Group - Marc Randazza starts a WAR with Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and STOMPS on Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All
in the process.

This Marc Randazza Blog Post is a Few Tidbits from the Crystal Cox Blogger Vs. Marc Randazza Freedom of Speech Attorney.

Marc Randazza, Celebrity First Amendment Attorney, has his Panties in a Wad over Crystal Cox Blogger (Not Porn Star) rejecting him as her Attorney, and Marc Randazza, is fighting back by conspiring with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set up Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza ( Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher ) has not done his homework on Obsidian Finance Group, or Kevin Padrick to determine if there a reason to investigate, or to believe that indeed Blogger Crystal Cox does have those Journalistic Standards or Ethics that Marc Randazza spoke of, and Questioned in our conversations.

See, Marc Randazza ( Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher ) went to school to be a journalist, and does not seem to be interested in journalistic adventures, such as reading, or Marc Randazza would easily see that Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group are in some major conflicts of interest; massive lobbying and solar tax credits issue, People in Lake County Oregon are very upset at their property rights being run over by Obsidian Finance Group, HomeStreet bank out of Washington filed an Objection to the Fees of Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, There is history of questionable behavior over the Longview Fibre Deal and Aloha Lumber, and the Oregon Trail Issues.

Marc Randazza ( Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher ) is so upset that Blogger Crystal Cox bought Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza cannot see the forest for the trees (aKa, being BITTER and Butthurt because I bought Marc Randazza .com, and refused to turn over Marc Randazza .com at his demands, oh the nerve of me to Stand my Groung

Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage of his hurt ego.

Marc Randazza’s ego is leading him around. Oh, and about the Greater Good, Marc Randazza told Crystal Cox he was impressed with her, me, for standing up for and even being willing to not file an appeal for the Greater Good if that’s what he took. Marc Randazza told blogger Crystal Cox that it was very encouraging to hear that she would choose, to not appeal if that was best for lobby efforts and the good of all Bloggers and Citizen Journalists. And yet Marc Randazza, in a pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox is now working against the First Amendment Rights of all by working with the Plaintiff’s Camp in Obsidian V. Cox, in order to set up Blogger Crystal Cox, and to throw a fit over a Domain name that he was not smart enough to buy, Marc Randazza .com .

Marc Randazza, does not seem to care who is guilty of what. All Marc Randazza can seem to see is red, because Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him for being a controlling ass and making deals behind her back and telling the WORLD that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox Blogger, when clearly he did not.

So in his rage, Marc Randazza has staged a Subpoena, even though he contacted the Plaintiff and offered himself up to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a Lesson. See, Marc Randazza is working with David Aman of Tonkon Torp in attempting to silence blogger Crystal Cox who is continuing to expose; Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Obsidian Renewables, Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice, Judge Randall Dunn, Perkins Coie Law Firm and Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Law Firm and Tom Stilley and Susan Ford, Miller Nash Law Firm, US Bankruptcy Code Violations in the Summit Bankruptcy, and events surrounding the Summit Accomodators Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon.

Ok So What Happened? How did I, Crystal Cox Blogger begin this pissing match with Marc Randazza, Porn Star Attorney Extraordinaire? Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher is a big baby because I bought a Dotcom, he does not approve of me buying, so Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher is seeking revenge. Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher is pretending to be subpoenad, when no way that is true, as I have registered hundreds upon hundreds of peoples names as dotcoms over the years and David Aman of Tonkon Torp is not Subpoening them in my Asset Seize Party at Tonkon Torp For Plaintiff Obsidian Finance Group.

See, after my 2.5 Million Dollar Set Up to “Attempt” to Hide the Secrets of Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp and other Big Oregon Law Firms and Corporations, well, one of my Bloggers contacted Marc Randazza and I agreed to a 3 way conversation to interview Marc Randazza, and he had agreed with my Blogger to talk with me in the possibility of taking my case.

During this call Marc Randazza said that if he took the case he would need money for a certain amount of costs and that it would be an expensive case to file appeal. He said, in a case like this he would normally charge at least $75,000. However, he was considering Pro Bono due to the Media attention I was getting, but even in that would need cost for copies and to be in a hotel in California for the appeal, if he or someone he recommended were to take the case.

Marc Randazza gave many signs during this call that Marc Randazza would most likely not represent me.

During this call Marc Randazza said he was concerned of the “record” and had to take a look at it before deciding. I said that was a responsible thing to do, he said he would look at my documents and get back to me, he did not get back to me, yet told others he represented me, more on that in a bit.

Marc Randazza told me on this call that I had “made a mess,” which I found very slamming as what I do is for the Greater Good and what I was exposing was and is on the right side of the law and certainly on the right side of the Moral Compass.

Marc Randazza saying this, let me know that he had no idea that what I did was a ‘calling,’ it was for massive change and a good thing to bring attention to this issue. Marc Randazza treated me as if I had made a “mess” and with complete disrespect. When in fact, I am creating “Media” and “Legal” attention to something that is VERY important for the Greater Good of ALL.

Marc Randazza said that he was concerned with my “Journalistic Standards”, SHOCKING isn't it, a Porn King Attorney representing folks that "Society" judges and Marc Randazza is judging and slamming my “Journalistic Standards”? Anyway this disrespectful comment led me to believe that Marc Randazza seemed to have been eating up the bad information about me, this was another sign to me that Marc Randazza was not going to represent me.

I am an Investigative Blogger. And a Very Good ONE. For Over 3 years, I have read contracts, insider emails, legal briefs, documents, LLC Agreements, Legal Filings and I listened to Audio’s of Court Sessions, watched videos of depositions and insider meetings and I interviewed, and yes took notes from the side of the Debtors, Investors, Creditors and more in the Summit Bankruptcy, deeper than any other news outlet. I have covered this story in depth and linked to lots of proof and documentation.

The Media Bloggers Association should pay close attention, as what I was doing was exposing documents, and linking to those documents, and this is what most all bloggers do. The fact that I curse, Capitalize in Odd Places and have my own "Independent Style", well that make me legally "media" as well, and it does not change the Facts. I do what ALL good Investigative Bloggers, Alternative News and Citizen Journalists Do.

Big Media wants to shut me up, so they lie about me, and for some reason Marc Randazza ate up what Big Media said about me, even though it was NOT True. Marc Randazza did not care about my side. Marc Randazza simply ran me over with his personal opinions and agenda. Marc Randazza says if I were not so UnEthical he may hire me. What? Marc Randazza has no idea what Ethical Is.

Marc Randazza told me that he used to work for Big Media but now he works for bloggers and porn stars, because Marc Randazza claimed that Big Media had the agenda of creating a Monopoly so they make more money. Yet NOW Marc Randazza is working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox.

Marc Randazza told me that he would have to talk to his existing clients, such as The Media Association of Bloggers, to see if there was a conflict before deciding to represent me or not. Marc Randazza claimed he would get back to me on this. Instead, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff’s side and tried to cut a deal WITHOUT my Consent, without “getting back to me” and without discussing if he represented me, wanted to represent me or if there was a Conflict.

Meanwhile Marc Randazza, of The Media Bloggers Association (MBA) , told lots of people in the “business” that he represented Blogger Crystal Cox, yet that was NOT True. I had agreed to work with another Lawyer and this created a situation that caused me stress, and almost lost me the Lawyer I really wanted.

Did Marc Randazza have to “discuss” a conflict with the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) in any way BEFORE Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff’s side and tried to work out a deal, as if he represented me? I was told at that time by other members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was talking with the Plaintiff’s side and trying to work out some arrangement regarding money, or a change to case law. I was Pro Se for a year and I wrote over 50 Court Filed Documents myself. I was and AM in the KNOW on my Case and Marc Randazza simply left me out, as if I had no brain, no rights and with total disrespect for me, Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza simply and certainly unethically took it upon himself to contact the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian V. Cox, without my knowledge and without getting back to me on if he wanted to work with me or not, Marc Randazza simply left me hanging with time running out and was working behind my back on a deal. Is this Legal? Well it is certainly NOT Ethical and certainly shows no respect for bloggers nor the First Amendment Rights that Marc Randazza, Allegedly wants to protect.

Also on that first phone call Marc Randazza said he thought it was funny that the Plaintiff thinks they can get $2.5 Million out of me, and now Marc Randazza has offered himself up to help them get any assets they think I have and ESPECIALLY that $10 Domain Name, Marc Randazza .com, that dumb shit Marc Randazza NEVER Registered for himself. Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to take Domain Names, which is my only way to make a living, and all in the name of “Constitutional Rights” What? This makes no sense and is NOT True.

Marc Randazza is Vindictive, plain and simply. He was not chosen in the BIGGEST case that the blogsphere has EVER seen regarding one blogger, and a case that will change laws and is already a world wide phenomena and that blogger, me, had the nerve to buy Marc Randazza .com and to even suggest that Marc Randazza hire her to do PR for him. Marc Randazza is so mad that Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage of Marc Randazza’s EGO.

In one of Marc Randazza’s last communications to me he said “do you really want to make an enemy of me?” Marc Randazza thinks that a blogger, a woman being smarter than him is making him an enemy.

So Marc Randazza is on a mission to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson and be “Deposed” to rant about me to the Plaintiff to attempt to further quash my “Free Speech” and First Amendment Rights, and thereby affecting all BLOGGERS and Alternative Media Worldwide.

Marc Randazza told me that if I appeal it MAY create Bad Law and that maybe I should consider NOT appealing so that my case can be used to Lobby for others in changing laws. I was in agreement, and told Marc Randazza that I simply wanted advice from those surrounding the First Amendment Rights Issue and the First Amendment Bar, so that I could do what was best for all Bloggers, Citizens Journalists and the First Amendment Rights of All. Marc Randazza said he was very glad to hear that, and it made him want to work with me even more.

Marc Randazza said, if I take your case then my Ethical Duty is to you, yet Marc Randazza acted as if he had taken my case, without talking to me about it, and was already negotiating with the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian Finance Group Vs. Blogger Crystal Cox.

To me, Crystal Cox, this says that Marc Randazza was already acting as my attorney, and did have an Ethical Duty to me to not disclose my stance, emails, or private conversations with him. Yet Marc Randazza contacted the “Other” side to Negotiate, and that was in December. Now Marc Randazza is using information I gave him in a Deposition that Marc Randazza is giving the "Plaintiff" to attempt to put me in my place and to take a $10 Domain Name that Marc Randazza was not smart enough to buy, and this, in my opinion, is an Ethical Breach, if not Plain Ol’ Illegal.

Last December I found out that Marc Randazza was Negotiating with the Plaintiff’s Side OF MY LEGAL CASE without my PERMISSION. I was told this by other members of the First Amendment Bar that wanted to represent me. They had heard that Marc Randazza represented me and even spoke with Marc Randazza, and he had flat out claimed to be representing me, yet Marc Randazza had not told me he was even still considering representing me, Blogger Crystal Cox.

Crystal Cox was told by other Attorneys that I needed to let Marc Randazza know that he did not represent me, because Marc Randazza was telling everybody that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox on Appeal of Obsidian V. Cox (I have Emails and more to Prove this).

Marc Randazza has so little respect for potential clients that Marc Randazza simply does as

Marc Randazza pleases without his client’s or potential client’s knowledge.

Can I Sue Marc Randazza for trying to make a deal, acting as if he was my attorney without my consent? I certainly can file Bar Complaints in NV, CA, MA, FL, and AZ to Start.

Marc Randazza is now part of a Witch Hunt to discredit blogger Crystal Cox, in effort to protect Big Corporations such as Obsidian Finance Group, Pacific Power, Government Oversight people such as Judge Randall Dunn and Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice and Law Firms such as Tonkon Torp, Sussman Shank and Perkins Coie.

Marc Randazza is sacrificing the Free Speech rights of ALL in Marc Randazza’s own personal Ego trip over a blogger that bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is NOT a man for the rights of Free Speech. Marc Randazza is a man for the personal EGO Trip of Marc Randazza.

So how is Marc Randazza working with the “Bad Guys” and on the Opposite Side of Free Speech?

Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to set me up. Marc Randazza is pretending to be under subpoena and pretending to have no choice, but the truth is that Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff, and Marc Randazza initiated dealing with them against me because his EGO is bent that I did not CHOOSE him and I bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is even flying to Portland to be deposed at the Tonkon Torp Law Firm. Gee I wonder whose dime this is on? And all this because they want to Silence a Blogger Exposing Corruption and to spite a Pro Se Defendant who went with a different lawyer and bought the whiny baby’s name as a dotcom.

Marc Randazza is on an Ego Trip and it affects all Bloggers, yet Marc Randazza acts as if he works for the best interest of Bloggers and for the best interest of the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) .

Marc Randazza does not work for the best interest of Bloggers, nor of the Best interest of the First Amendmant. Marc Randazza is on an Ego trip for Marc Randazza and so in creating a war over a domain name that he was too dumb to buy and in being pissed off because I told him I did not want him to represent me, well now Marc Randazza is working directly against the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers.

So Who Is Marc Randazza ?

Marc Randazza , Marc John Randazza of Randazza Legal Group with offices Miami, Phoenix & Toronto. Marc Randazza is an Attorney Licensed in Arizona, Nevada, California, Massachusetts, and Florida.

Marc Randazza claims to fight for the First Amendment rights of all. Marc Randazza is an Attorney specializing in protecting porn and online gambling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza )

According to wikipedia.org, Marc Randazza’s first case was representing a fraternity at Boston University, when the brothers of that fraternity were accused of destroying a house they had rented and accused of other misconduct. Marc Randazza then began practicing in Florida as a real estate attorney. Marc Randazza seems to have started right out working for the wrong side of the law and certainly the wrong side of the law in representing drunken fraternity brother’s who seem to have destroyed some one’s property.

Marc Randazza, according to wikipedia, “Soon thereafter, moved to Orlando, Florida where his practice in First Amendment and media law expanded. He started representing defendants in SLAPP suits, pornography businesses, and protesters, in often unpopular constitutional law matters.” Marc Randazza seems to have started right out of the gate on his First Amendment Soap Box defending those seemingly on the wrong side of the law and the wrong side of the moral compass. Yet Marc Randazza slams me for “Journalistic Standards” and works directly against a blogger whom he had acted as if he once worked for in this same manner. Geez, WHAT a Mess Ol’ Marc Randazza has made of all this.

Marc Randazza is a Public Figure, indeed having been in debates on Fox news and other television and having worked for Big Media as Marc Randazza told me. So why are there not more bloggers EXPOSING Marc Randazza ? Well I guess, Marc Randazza really was for blogger’s rights, until he got all BENT over Blogger Crystal Cox and decided to be part of taking down the Free Speech Rights for ALL Bloggers.

According to wikipedia, “"Randazza has a practice that primarily focuses on the areas of First Amendment litigation, adult entertainment, trademark and copyright litigation, and domain name arbitration disputes." So you see Marc Randazza, has to save face and punish me somehow because I am Smarter than Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza represented people in WIPO cases yet claims he does not care about my WIPO case with Proskauer Rose Law Firm out of New York, in which I Legally won the right to own the names in dispute. This is a case precedence of my Legal Right to buy Marc Randazza .com, and though Marc Randazza is some big deal in Domain Name Arbitration, Marc Randazza did not have the Brains to buy Marc Randazza dotcom.

WOW, guess all that PORN has fried ol’ Marc Randazza’s brain so he has now teamed up with the Evil David Aman of Tonkon Torp who, along with his “Plaintiff” Kevin Padrick was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal and named in the Objection to Fees in the Summit Bankruptcy in which several insiders filed to Object to the Massive Conflicts of Interest and Outrageous Fees involving Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick

More on that at the Link Below for Now (if Links are Broken due to stolen Domain Names, email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com for a copy of the Objection to Fees in Summit and in the Homestreet Bank Scandal involving Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, as well as other documents of those who really do and have had issue with Obsidian and Kevin Padrick )

http://www.ObjectionToFees.com/

Sure must be a low blow to the Massive Ego of Marc Randazza to have been trumped by a blogger, and a Woman. Marc Randazza is one of those classic examples of Attorneys who simply shut you up and toss you in the back seat of a legal case as if he is smarter and can handle it, which obviously Marc Randazza is not smarter then blogger Crystal Cox even if Marc Randazza is conspiring to set up Blogger Crystal Cox to protect his Ego.

According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza serves as General Counsel to Corbin Fisher, who apparently is smart enough to own their dotcom, careful though there is a warning on the home page of naked men engaging in sex acts. Guess I better not buy CorbinFisherSucks.com, though it sounds like a fun name to have, but it seems that Corbin Fisher (an Adult Media Company) is a smart company owning their own dotcom and all. Too bad Corbin Fisher’s general counsel Dickhead Marc Randazza was not so smart. I think Blogger “Crystal Cox” would make a much better General Counsel for Corbin Fisher, don’t You?

According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza has “represented a number of well-known adult entertainment companies including Kink.com, Bang Bus, and Milf Hunter. He also represents media businesses such as BME and bloggers in SLAPP suits.” So the Porn King Attorney Mark Randazza is all for Freedom of Speech, ... well EVERYTHING, except a Woman Being Smarter than Him and buying a dotcom of MarcRandazza.com. Marc Randazza can’t have that, so he is off to Portland to a Deposition of the Asset’s of Crystal Cox in order to conspire to set up Blogger Crystal Cox and teach her, me a lesson for being SMARTER than Ego Maniac Marc Randazza.

Maybe his buddy David Aman will Take the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com, which I bought after my Judgement and Maybe David Aman, attorney for Obsidian Finance Group, will simply GIVE the domain name Marc Randazza .com to Marc Randazza then he can STOP Crying over it.

Marc Randazza is Directly against the First Amendment Rights of Blogger Crystal Cox in her buying Marc Randazza .com. Yet Marc Randazza defends others in outrageous domain name ownership case.

Though Marc Randazza tells me he don’t care about WIPO, yes Marc Randazza actually said that in an email to Blogger Crystal Cox, anyway, According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza “has represented the defendant in Beck v. Eiland-Hall, a case before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) filed by political commentator Glenn Beck, ...The WIPO arbitrator ruled against Beck in the case, and in favor of Randazza's client.” Yet when I told Marc Randazza that I had represented myself in a WIPO case over an Attorney’s name and won, he said he did not care. Yet it sure seems that Marc Randazza is proud of his WIPO case win, in my opinion, of course.

SO what was the Beck V. Eiland-Hall case, and just what was Marc Randazza defending as a Free Speech right? Well the Domain name in that dispute was, (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") .

Marc Randazza says I have no right to own a domain name that corresponds to his name, Geez Marc Randazza did not think that in this domain name (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") I Guess that is just those double standards of Mr. Marc Randazza popping up again.

So Marc Randazza fought for the right for his client to own the domain name, "www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" - as you see at this link http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody

Hypocrite Marc Randazza thinks it is OK for his client to buy and own a sick domain name such as that, that accuses a man of rape and murder, but it is not OK for me to own Marc Randazza .com. Seems a bit of a double standard, don't you think? It is not ok to own that kind of a domain name, it is sick, it accuses a man of rape and murder and yet is defended by Marc Randazza. That site seems to be gone now, so what happened, who bought it? What was the "pay off," the circumstance? Got a Tip? SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Marc Randazza knows all about WIPO, and Copyrights, and Intellectual Property so why not just take the Domain Name? Why get on the Bandwagon of the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to Stomp on the Free Speech Rights of All Citizen Journalists and to deliberately STOMP on the First Amendment Rights of every United States Citizen who my case, Obsidian V. Cox now represents in Free Speech Issues?

You see if Asshole Marc Randazza had a Right to take the Domain Name then he would right?

So why work with the "Bad Guys" to steal the domain name, because he wants to make a point and steal the Domain Name he was not smart enough to buy. And all with the Collateral Damage of the Rights of Free Speech of Every Blogger World Wide, and of the First Amendment Rights of Everyone, Period?

Marc Randazza thinks, as you will see in the emails, that I should have asked him before I bought Marc Randazza Dotcom, gee did his client ask Glen Beck if they could buy "GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" ? I bet NOT.

Marc Randazza is simply pissed off at a Woman who did not want to let him represent her, ME, even For Free, because he was an arrogant aggressive ass to me and because he went behind my back making deals BEFORE I even agreed to be his client. I have more respect for myself than to let a BULLY, Lying, Thug Such as Marc Randazza represent me, even if for FREE.

Marc Randazza is so mad at me for not choosing him, and at me, Blogger Crystal Cox for buying the Asshole's name as a dotcom, that Marc Randazza is making the World his Collateral Damage in a Marc Randazza pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox.

Thing is, no matter what you Pricks set me up for, the TRUTH remains to be the TRUTH, the Criminal in all this REMAINS to be the Criminal, Kevin Padrick remains to be suspect of White Collar Crimes, and all those involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal will remain to have been involved, and your foul play, ethics violations and double standards will one day bite you in the ASS. As the TRUTH has a way of rising to the TOP. I have Faith.

Marc Randazza is all for Free Speech and First Amendment Rights, but only in his selfish, immoral world of what Free Speech is and that does not seem to include citizen journalists exposing corruption or Internet Marketers who are Smarter then Marc Randazza and buy his dotcom.

Marc Randazza (Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher) - obviously needs Internet Marketing help, so I offered it to him as I do everyone I can. It’s what I do, I would like to make money at it. Marc Randazza has his panties so wound up around his you know what, he just can’t think. So instead of defending the First Amendment and those trying to expose corruption, Marc Randazza contacts the Plaintiff to work against the Pro Se First Amendment Defendant and on the Opposite Side of First Amendment Rights. And why? Because I bought MarcRandazza.com and he was too dumb to buy it so now he wants to conspire to silence me.

Does Marc Randazza know that David Aman is alleged to be under an FBI Investigation over his connection to a man in Montana who tried to intimidate me to get me to take David Aman’s “Settlement Communication” which offered me a deal, if I commit a crime “ and just swear that people committed a crime that they did not, well then he would generously let me out of a 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit, is this Legal?

See That Post Here
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/david-aman-attorney-for-plaintiff-kevin.html

And if you want to order the hearing transcript of the alleged FBI Investigation that hearing is called “Motion to Exclude” it is a matter of court record.

So what ever happens in the WAR between Crystal Cox (not a Porn Star) and Marc Randazza, First Amendment Attorney fighting for the rights of Porn Stars, and other Adult Entertainment First Amendment rights . . . well whatever happens, my intention on my first talk with Marc Randazza was to listen with an open mind, in the possibility of Marc Randazza representing me, and buying MarcRandazza.com, well that is just what I do, I buy the names of those who are part of stories that I come across or involve me. The domain name was available, and so I bought it. I am for hire for PR, and Search Engine Marketing, I offer that service.

Marc Randazza is a Bully, and is now working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox as Marc Randazza does not believe I have a legal right to own or to have bought MarcRandazza.com, a domain name which you would think ol’ Marc Randazza would have owned long ago.

So why hasn’t Marc Randazza simply filed a WIPO complaint if Marc Randazza has the legal right to own Marc Randazza .com ? Well you see it seems like more fun and more vindictive for Marc Randazza to work on the opposite side of Free Speech and First Amendment Rights and instead set up blogger Crystal Cox with his Good Ol’ Buddies at Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group in which Marc Randazza attempted to make a deal with them, financially on my behalf BEHIND MY Back and when he did not represent me.

Yes, I am under the impression that back in December, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff to make a deal on my behalf for them to change the judgement so it would not affect the Porn Industry Free Speech, and this was to be in my best interest. And I was told that at that same time Marc Randazza claimed to many in the First Amendment Bar, that he represented me, and yet Marc Randazza had not told me, the “Alleged” Client. In my Opinion, based on my personal experience I do not recommend nor trust Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza, seems to me to work on the OPPOSITE side of Free Speech in order to teach a female investigative blogger a lesson for being smarter than him.

Marc Randazza was not offered the chance to buy Marc Randazza .com, NO WAY. He will only get the name if he files a WIPO complaint, or sucks up to Plaintiff Kevin Padrick and his Attorney David Aman, if they seize the Domain Name and give it to Marc Randazza in some deal possibly made to set up, to silence blogger Crystal Cox for exposing; Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Obsidian Finance Group and their connections to Oregon Solar Credits, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Judge Randall Dunn, Blue Heron Paper Company, Dept. of Justice Pamela Griffith, Perkins Coie Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Susan Ford and Tom Stilley, Miller Nash, Bonneville Power, Lake County Oregon Commissioners, the Bend Oregon D.A. Office.

Marc Randazza claims to be a Copyright Expert, so if there is a Legal Reason that Marc Randazza should get to own Marc Randazza .com that Marc Randazza was to dumb to buy, then why doesn’t big shot Domain Name Arbitration Lawyer Marc Randazza, simply TAKE Marc Randazza .com by force instead of working in the dark, in back alleys and side deals with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, which is looking to be the biggest case of Free Speech For Bloggers that the Blogsphere has ever seen in quite this way?

And if it is NOT Legal to buy Marc Randazza .com if I am not Marc Randazza, then why in the world is it Legal for Godaddy to Sell the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com?

So Liars, Thugs and Thieves, Sue Me, Set Me Up, Do what ever makes you feel better and sleep best at night. Punish me for being Smarter than you are. Still the Truth Remains the Truth, and even if you set me up from some jail time, you are still an asshole and you were still not smart enough to register your own name as dotcom. Enjoy the Game you're Playing with the First Amendment Rights of the Entire World.

You Know Your TRUTH and I know mine.
I Let Go, Let God. It will be What it will be.

Gee I hope that Randazza Legal Group owns Randazza Legal Group .com, as I won a WIPO Case for ProskauerLawFirm.com, you know what WIPO is, right Asshole?

Stay Tuned for Crystal Cox Vs. Marc Randazza Part 2 as the Pissing Match Continues. The next Part will have emails between Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox Blogger and explanations of communications from my point of view, of course. This will also include my Email to Marc Randazza rejecting him in representing me because Marc Randazza is an arrogant Ass and was disrespectful to me.

Source of Information in this Article - Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza

And from notes of my phone call and emails with Marc Randazza and with other Attorneys of the First Amendment Bar as well as other Internet Research

Got a Tip on Marc Randazza? I would love to know.
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, Crystal@CrystalCox.com,
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

Marc Randazza is a BUTTHURT Hypocrite. Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox, because he is "Butthurt" that Crystal Cox Bought Mark Randazza .com, Yet Marc Randazza says "Butthurt is Butthurt" and No Recourse is ALLOWED for Sandra Fluke, So Why Does Butt Hurt Marc Randazza GET his Pay Day REVENGE?

"Butthurt is not Defamation. Butthurt is Butthurt, and you don't get paid for that in the United States of America. Not on my watch." ~ Marc J. Randazza

Source of Marc J. Randazza Quote
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh

WOW, Shocking words from a man who is So "Butthurt" that Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him as her attorney, even if it was for FREE, that he turned on me, threatened to make me his ENEMY and then Sided with the Plaintiff out to Suppress Free Speech for All Bloggers who Do What I Do.

Marc Randazza is So "BUTTHURT" that Blogger Crystal Cox, ME bought Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza is willing to sacrafice Free Speech for All in Siding with the EVIL Plaintiff in Obsidian Finance Group V. Pro Se Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza has Double Standards on Top of top
of Double Standards.

Marc Randazz is pissed off at Blogger Crystal Cox because I bought Marc Randazza .com, and so he wants "Paid" for "Being Butthurt". And YES in the United States.

Marc Randazza wanted me to give him the Domain Name MarcRandazza.com that he was to DUMB to Buy, this is essentially wanted PAID for being "Butthurt", Right?

By giving him something that did NOT belong to him, so that he would not make me an Enemy. That was his THREAT. So Because I chose to NOT cower to Marc Randazza's Threats, Marc Randazza has contacted the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox and offered to give "testimony", a Deposition, in Effort to Help the Plaintiff Steal Domain Names that I use to make a Living and to flat out SEIZE Marc Randazza .com, which I bought after the $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement Against Me.

Marc Randazza is "BUTTHURT" and "Whiny" because Internet Savvy Crystal Cox Blogger was smarter then Marc Randazza, Alleged First Amendment Attorney, but only when it comes to things other then Marc Randazza's Butthurt EGO.

Marc Randazza is really a "Media Whore" and where there looks to be a high profile Freedom of Speech Case there is Marc Randazza Yammering some Gibberish and pretending it is in the name of Free Speech and the First Amendment. However, NOT when it comes to the Free Speech of Citizen Journalists and Anti-Corruption Bloggers such as Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" is now defending Rush Limbaugh, and pretending it is in the name of Free Speech, while at the same time in secret talks to STOMP on the First Amendment in Obsidian Vs. Cox.

Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" is Yapping on the Rush Limbaugh calling a Woman a Slut and Prostitute Case, because Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" wants attention on him as a celebrity First Amendment Attorney. Thing is that does not mean that Marc Randazza is really for the First Amendment, Free Speech and Constitutional Rights of ALL. FOR Marc Randazza is Not For the Constitutional Rights of Female Blogger Clients such as Me, who DEMAND to be treated with RESPECT, or I will not even let HIM work FOR ME for FREE. There are more important things then MONEY. I have worked for over 6 years, and put my life, ever cent, and gave up everything I knew as my life to Fight for These Victims and I Will Be Damned if I will Let Some, Pompous Arrogant Attorney sit me in the corner and shut me up.

Marc Randazza, "Media Whore", interjecting is Two Cents on the Rush Limbaugh Rant, is simply to drum up business, because he won a case or two, but has sense spent that money and NOW needs to get his nose into High Profile Free Speech Cases to get another Gig. Marc Randazza is NOT Do Gooder for the the Freedom of Speech for All.

Marc Randazza told Blogger Crystal Cox, "you really want to make an enemy of me" and all I, Blogger Crystal Cox, did was Reject Marc Randazza as my attorney because he was pompous, arrogant, self assuming and treated me as if I have no brain. AND I bought a Domain Name that Internet Genius, Domain Name Arbitration Expert, and Alleged Internet Legal Super Star Marc Randazza was to Slow on the Draw to Buy.

Marc Randazza brags that he is the first one that people call in a defamation suit, thing is that is because those people found Marc Randazza in the search engines. Yet Marc Randazza did not have the brains to buy Marc Randazza .com, so now Marc Randazza is butt hurt and working with Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp Law Firm whom single handidly STOMPED on the First Amendment Rights of ALL.

More on Blogger Crystal Cox Vs. Egotistical Ass, Vindictive, Liar, UnEthical,
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-celebrity-first-amendment.html

More on the Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" defending Rush Limbaugh
for calling a woman a Slut and a Prostitute.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh

Got a Tip on First Amendment SCUM Lawyer Marc Randazza?
Email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com OR
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com
Posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

More of Me Yammering About Marc Randazza's BULLSHIT
http://MarkRandazza.blogspot.com/

Marc Randazza Talks a Good Game for Freedom of Speech and First Amendment Rights, However Marc Randazza DOES not Walk the Talk when it comes to his own Butthurt EGO Trip and the First Amendment Rights of Others. Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite, a Liar, an Asshole and has Violated my First Amendment Rights.

Marc Randazza Emails Blogger Crystal Cox and Demands She Turn over Marc Randazza .com, even though Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and Corbin Fisher, has fought for others to own domain names with people's name and even worse.

Though Marc Randazza knows that Blogger Crystal Cox won a WIPO case involving several Domain Names of Top Lawyers of one of the Worlds Biggest Law Firms, Proskauer Rose, still Marc Randazza threatens me, blogger Crystal Cox, that I if I don't turn over the Domain Name that will make him an enemy. Marc Randazza knows I have every legal and ethical right to have bought and to own Marc Randazza .com, yet Marc Randazza is teaching me a lesson by working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox to steal my Domain Names as Assets, even though a couple of months ago Marc Randazza could have bought Marc Randazza .com for $10.

Marc Randazza is a such a hypocrite as he writes about the Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh Issue and seems to be defending free speech, yet at the same time claims that she is Butthurt and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on His Watch. Yet at the Same Time Marc Randazza is trying to make Blogger Crystal Cox PAY for his Butthurt over not buying his own name as a Dotcom (DotDUMB that Was), anyway now Marc Randazza is headed to Portland Oregon for a March 23 Deposition, one in which I am sure if you check his communications records, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff's Camp to work AGAINST Crystal Cox Blogger, and Against Free Speech.

In Marc Randazza's article regarding Sandra Fluke, Marc Randazza Said this,
"When a plaintiff alleging defamation is a public figure, he or she must show that the allegedly false statements were made with actual malice – that is, knowing falsity, or a reckless disregard for the truth. N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan" SO Marc Randazza is fully aware that in Obsidian V. Cox, Obsidian and Kevin Padrick are Public Figures and I had NO Actual Malice. Marc Randazza spoke with me and told other First Amendment Lawyers that he represented me, Blogger Crystal Cox, and claimed to have been negotiating with the Plaintiff, which was news to me. Now if Marc Randazza claims this did not happen, I am sure the other Attorneys will not lose their career in a perjured deposition to lie for Marc Randazza.

Link to the Butthurt Sandra Fluke / Marc Randazza Article
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh

I want to Sue Marc Randazza, email me at SavvyBroker@yahoo.com to represent me Pro Bono. Surely Marc Randazza has liability insurance for his yaps and threats. And isn't it illegal to act as if he represented me and try and negotiate a deal giving my private information to the Plaintiff, when he had not discussed with me, the "Alleged" Client?

Marc Randazza may flat out lie to you and say he was Subpoenad and did not contact the Plaintiff First, thing is over 6 years I have registered hundreds of "other people's names" as domain names, so why in the world would the Plaintiff Subpoena only ONE. The Truth is that Marc Randazza contacted them to make me, Blogger Crystal Cox, pay for the Marc Randazza Butthurt.

Here is the Article where Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group says that Butthurt is Butthurt, and not defamation and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on his watch.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh even though when it comes to Butthurt Marc Randazza he sure is teaching Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson in what it is to be an "enemy" of the Infamous double talking, hypocritical ASSHOLE Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza Defended Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , yet Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards.

Oh and Let's not forget the Ted Klaudt Common Law Copyright Dispute, and check out the Photo that Marc Randazza used for that article, (it is below on the left). In the Ted Klaudt case.

The Headline Reads "Former Rep Ted Klaudt claims "common law copyright" in his name to try and suppress news stories about him raping his kids".

Marc Randazza Says, "We sure do see a lot of intellectual property abuse around here. This has to be the best one yet. Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt claims that he has a "common law copyright" in his name, and thus any news organization or other publication that uses his name must pay him a licensing fee of $500,000."

Yet Marc Randazza feels that he has copyright of his name. So the Name Marc Randazza is a bigger, better name than Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt's name? How does that Work? Marc Randazza is willing to take help the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to take the Domain Names of Blogger Crystal Cox in effort to hide the Secret Deals, Corruption, and Conflicts of Industry, involving Law Firms Tonkon TorpSussman Shank, Perkins Coie and Miller Nash and involving Solar Tax Credits and the Actions of Obsidian Finance Group's Kevin Padrick as a Trustee in a $40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy out of Bend Oregon. Marc Randazza is also willing to STOMP on the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of all in helping a Plaintiff that he admitted was certainly hurting Free Speech for All.

In the Ted Klaudt Scandal, Marc Randazza accuses the actions of Ted Klaudt to be simply to stop a "news organization" from informing the public. Which is exactly what I was doing. Obsidian Finance Group had no legal right to be the Trustee, neither did Kevin Padrick, as he was an insider. This case needs investigated and many were harmed and not just financially, lives were ruined. Marc Randazza will now be named in the Federal RICO Complaint I am Filing, as Well as FBI Complaints and Department of Justice Complaints. I have been investigating this story for 4 years, and Butthurt Marc Randazza is now on the side of suppressing information but taking my domain names and siding with the WRONG side First Amendment Rights.

In that Same Article Marc Randazza Says this to Ted Klaudt.
"Guess what Klaudt, you just made yourself even more famous, short eyes."
I Say This to Hypocrite Marc Randazza, "Guess What Fuckhead Marc Randazza, your working with the Bad Guys and you WILL Be even "more famous" as a thug, liar and asshole" But surely that was what you were going for.

Source information for Marc Randazza Article and Marc Randazza Case and Yammer Research

Ted Klaudt Article, Complete with Photo
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/former-rep-ted-klaudt-claims-common-law-copyright-his-name-try-and-suppress-news-stories-a

Rush Limbaugh, Sandra Fluke Research Links

http://www.easternecho.com/index.php/article/2012/03/pointcounterpoint_limbaugh_slut_scandaldebate_hijacked_by_the_left

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/09/megyn-kelly-sandra-fluke-oreilly_n_1334470.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204603004577269491399954950.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/07/patricia-heaton-s-history-of-outbursts-sandra-fluke-attack-no-anomaly.html

http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh
Marc Randazza is a LIAR when He Claims to Love the First Amendment, Marc Randazza only loves the First Amendment when it gets him a JOB.

"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" Case Research Links
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody

http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-on-wrong-side-of-free.html

Posted here by
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
aKa, Marc Randazza ENEMY
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

Domainer Crystal Cox, also Investigative BLOGGER Says Flat Out, Mark Randazza is in NO WAY a "Domainer Advocate". Marc Randazza is fighting Domainer Crystal Cox for being Smart Enough to Buy Marc Randazza.com .

This Blog Post Headline Reads "Domainer advocate Marc Randazza on CNN"

Folks this is Flat WRONG. Marc Randazza is NOT on the Side of the Domainer, NO WAY. Marc Randazza has threatened Domainer, Blogger Crystal Cox for Buying Marc Randazza .com (A Domain). Mark Randazza is no Advocate for Domainers nor Free Speech or the First Amendment Rights of All.

Marc Randazza Post Claiming that Marc Randazza is on the Side of Domainers. Marc Randazza is not on the Side of this Domainer. I have been a Domainer sine 2005. I have Been to TRAFFIC, have joined associations over the years and met the biggest players out there. And believe Marc Randazza is NO Advocate for the Domainers. Here is the Blog Quote.

"Las Vegas based attorney Marc Randazza, runs the popular law blog The Legal Satyricon. The blog centers around law, freedom of speech issues, technology and – surprise, surprise – domain names and the universe of issues that bring along, such as cybersquatting, UDRP cases and trademarks.

Distinguished for his sharp sense of humor and licensed to practice in Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts and Nevada, Marc is often a quiet “behind the scenes” domainer advocate.
Today, CNN features Marc Randazza’s stance on the First Amendment and the right to voicing one’s opinion, regardless of how extreme it might be."

Source of Marc Randazza Gibberish
http://domaingang.com/domain-news/domainer-advocate-marc-randazza-on-cnn/

Marc Randazza is Directly Working Against Crystal Cox Domain and Blogger's First Amendment Rights and my rights to "voicing my opinion". As well as my voice exposing documented FACT. Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite.

posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Industry Whistleblower
ENEMY of Marc Randazza

Marc Randazza ~ now Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group, has his buddies blogging about Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group in an attempt for Marc Randazza to hide the Marc Randazza, Crystal Cox Scandal and Massive VIOLATIONS of my Free SPEECH and First Amendment Rights by Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza Scandal

Here are Some Marc Randazza Tidbits from this Marc Randazza Love Post
The Quote Posts are in BLUE, and the Source of the Quotes is Listed At the End.

"Marc Randazza sees the Rakofsky suit, and far too many like it, as an attempt to pervert the power of law to the cause of stifling speech. He leapt, almost unbidden, to the defense of the Rakofsky blawgers in need of representation. "

Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group is the one attempting to "pervert" power.

Marc Randazza is the KING of Perverting Power.

Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group tried to bluff Blogger Crystal Cox and tell me I had no right to own, buy and blog on Marc Randazza . com. Yet, Marc Randazza, defending others in Domain Name Ownership with the actual names of people and domain names themselves that accuse people of horrible acts. This is Ok to Marc Randazza, yet it is not ok for Crystal Cox, Blogger, Domainer to have purchased Marc Randazza .com .

Marc Randazza tried to pull a power trip over Crystal Cox, me and tell me I had no right to own Marc Randazza .com, which is simply NOT True. Marc Randazza STOMPS on my rights of Free Speech, and works against me in a case where if I don't get my case over turned, all BLOGGERS will be affected, no matter what the Lies of David Carr of the New Times is Telling You.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is the biggest case EVER regarding One Individual Blogger, that is Truly Independent, if Marc Randazza and the Plaintiff shut down my voice then this affects all Bloggers till the end of time, or the Internet as we know it.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is truly about a Blogger getting wind of a story and fighting for the victims, selflessly for 4 years and losing everything to stand up for what is right. The Obsidian V. Cox case is a case about finding information, digging through years of documents, getting tips and emails, reading document after documents, interviewing insiders, reading legal filings, reading contracts, listening to court audios, reading court transcripts and EXPOSING the inside details of a 40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is about the Plaintiff, Obsidian Finance Group trying to hide their secrets and what really happened and about David Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm protecting the involvement of Tonkon Torp, Leon Simson, David Peterson and David Aman himself in the Summit Bankruptcy. David Aman is still fighting to silence blogger Crystal Cox, because David Aman was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal as you see in the Objection to the Fees filed by several insiders in that case. There was also emails to and with David Aman and the Department of Justice, and with other attorneys involved as they tried to Tell David Aman, Tonkon Torp of what was going on and how violated the rights of creditors and seemed to violate Bankruptcy Code.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, knows that what Crystal Cox Blogger is saying is TRUE, yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm fights to take domain names to shut me down. Thing is Obsidian V. Cox will be overturned, TRUTH will win for REAL over alleged Defamation and investigators will really find out the TRUTH about the Behind the Scenes of the Summit Bankruptcy that they have for over 4 years ignored. David S. Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer knows that blogger Crystal Cox did not have actual malice and in fact had and has actual documents of truth, fact and anyone who can read can see that what Blogger Crystal Cox has and is Exposing has tons of documentation to back it up.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm fought for Kevin Padrick as Trustee in every issue over the Summit Scandal. And David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm even deposed Bankruptcy Whistleblower Stephanie DeYoung to ask about blogger Crystal Cox, yet did not contact me until 2 years later when I was Sued for 10 Million Dollars for EXPOSING THEM.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm is fighting to this day to try and shut down my blog, and this is to protect David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm and Leon Simson, David Peterson and others at Tonkon Torp, as they were involved in the alleged corruption I am exposing.

More on the above Blog Post Praising Marc Randazza

"I had heard of Marc Randazza prior to being named as a Rakofsky defendant, but I had never had any contact with him. His presence and reputation were known to me through his blog, The Legal Satyricon, and through the blogging of others, such as Scott Greenfield or Ken-at-Popehat who know him firsthand.

Marc Randazza is a zealot, but a zealot of the best kind. His zealotry finds its focus in the First Amendment, and particularly the portions of that Amendment protecting freedom of speech and expression. Speech, without regard to its couth, its coarseness, its wisdom, its dunderheadedness, its cultural value, its tendency to discomfit or offend, is embraced by the First Amendment, and Marc Randazza has devoted his career to its preservation. Like Horatius at the bridge, Marc Randazza stands beside the Sluice of Speech to defend it and to see that its flow stays as wide and as free and as indiscriminate as possible. "

This person seems to really like Marc Randazza, and to have had a good experience with Marc Randazza, I can respect that, thing is the facts of Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox are still the same. Marc Randazza really did violate my rights. Marc Randazza really did tell members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented me, and Marc Randazza really did contact the Plaintiff in my case to negotiate a deal on my behalf that I was not aware of. This violated my rights, gave the bad guys my strategy and inside information and was simply WRONG. Months later Marc Randazza really did contact the Plaintiff and offer to give a Subpoena to TAKE the Domain Names of Blogger, Domainer Crystal Cox in order to help the Plaintiff to silence my voice and the REWARD to Marc Randazza, I Believe, to be, Control over Marc Randazza .com .

Source of Quotes above ...
http://www.declarationsandexclusions.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-marc-randazza-marc-randazza.html

Folks, email me for my story, I plan to post more as soon as I have time, thing is Marc Randazza violated my Constitutional Rights. Marc Randazza went to the "Other Side" in Obsidian V. Cox, after talking to me and Marc Randazza did NOT have my permission. Marc Randazza misled me, and Marc Randazza suggested I not appeal for the Good of Other Bloggers, which I was open to, if that was best, however Turns out Marc Randazza may have gave me bad information that may have affected the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers and Citizen Journalists.

Marc Randazza knows that the Oregon Retraction Laws Apply to Blogger Crystal Cox, Marc Randazza knows that Crystal Cox had no "actual malice" and that I, Blogger Crystal Cox, to this day believe, that there was foul play and illegal behavior in the actions of David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.

Check your Facts, they are there, Depose me, Marc Randazza, and all involved, check phone and email records and you will see that indeed Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff without the Defendants approval and Marc Randazza gave the Plaintiff privileged strategy and information regarding Blogger Crystal Cox. Marc Randazza told other member of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox, and that he, Marc Randazza had already spoke with the Plaintiff's side to negotiate a deal. Marc Randazza to these same folks that he represented me and this caused me more stress in my case, as I had to explain what happened with Marc Randazza, and that he did not work for me, even though he was putting in "time and energy" on my case, and acting as my attorney without my permission.

If Marc Randazza lies about all this then it's a feud among Lawyers on who is lying, as I have proof. The Marc Randazza article above, may well be one Marc Randazza opinion or Marc Randazza Experience, Thing Is it is Certainly not my Experience with Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group.

See Marc Randazza, and all reading this, I really am telling the TRUTH and anyone that can read, hear, see, can easily see that TRUTH.

Instead most, including Marc Randazza, simply believe FORBES, the New York Times and the Plaintiff's lies about me, as they fight to cover up $40 Million in Secrets, and this also makes Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp look bad to the Energy Companies they Lobby For, to those who issue Solar Tax Credits, to PacifiCorp, and more.

The Thing is, I am telling the Truth to the best of my ability and have been for years on this same matter. Look at the Summit Objection to the Fees, the Lake County Residents Upset at Obsidian, the Objection to the Fees in Washington filed Against Obsidian Finance Group for the SAME thing that Kevin Padrick did in the Summit Bankruptcy. There is easily proven pattern and history for a Federal RICO Lawsuit. And now Marc Randazza has jumped in the middle of it all in the alleged name of Free Speech and First Amendment rights, yet at the same time Marc Randazza, has violated my Free Speech and First Amendment Rights.

I Trusted Marc Randazza, and he betrayed me, Plain and Simple.

Marc Randazza REFUSES Answering my Questions, though I am Pro Se and Marc Randazza has been Subpoenaed by the Plaintiff, Allegedly.
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/crystal-cox-pro-se-blogger-has-some.html

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group Is Painting Crystal Cox in False Light, even though Marc Randazza wanted to represent Crystal Cox Blogger in her "Appeal". Marc Randazza seems to be lying to create a smoke screen and to divert from the real issues and crimes surrounding the Obsidian Finance Group Vs. Crystal Cox Defamation Case (Civil), Turned Extortion Conviction (Criminal)

Marc Randazza offered to buy Marc Randazza.com long ago, though Kashmir Hill of Forbes has the story all wrong, and has not even seen the entire email communication between Blogger Crystal Cox and Marc Randazza nor does she know of the content of the Marc Randazza Crystal Cox phone call.

Anyway, Marc Randazza offered for the Domain Name, then he demanded, both I refused. Then Marc Randazza, to teach me a lesson, called the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to offer Testimony, a Deposition, to set me up for Extortion though I never Extorted Him. This because he was upset over me buying the Domain Name, which is certainly NOT illegal.

AFTER Marc Randazza Joined Forces with the "Bad Guys", the Plaintiff, and I, being my own attorney was given notice of Marc Randazza's Deposition to set me up, then I got upset and AFTER this, I bought several more dotcoms to prove a point, and noticing that Marc Randazza 's wife and daughter's dotcom was available, what better way to make the point of how bad he is at this "Domainer" thing, and how he is NOT the Internet Expert he Claims to Be.

See even after Marc Randazza threatened me for own his dot com and even though he defened Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , still he did not buy the dot com of his beloved, WHAT?

Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards. Was it extortion for the Glen Beck name to be purchased and used attacking Glen Back and accusing him of rape and murder? This Domain Name "implies"that a Young Girl is a "Minor" right? And it accuses a man of a Rape and Murder. This is Ok in the Eyes of Attorney Marc Randazza, but for some reason me Owning MarcRandazza.com is not, nor Owning JenniferRandazza.com and his childs name, which I bought AFTER he joined the plaintiff to PROVE and to prove Point, and I never Published that Information he did that. Popehat.com Kenneth White and Marc Randazza did that with her photo, as did Forbes Kashmir Hill. NOT ME.

Even after the threat to me for buying MarcRandazza.com, he still was to dumb to buy the dotcom of his own wife and child. I wanted to point out that he was a Fraud in his representation to Potential Clients, as I had interviewed Marc Randazza to possibly represent me, and he was so Disrespectful that I chose a better choice for me and for the Entire Blogger V. Journalist, Free Speech, First Amendment Rights Debate. I did not initiate connect with Marc Randazza, nor Him to me, we agreed to talk through the recommendation of another person, one of my Investigative Bloggers, whom was also on the call.

I never "Begged" Marc Randazza to be my Attorney, in FACT I never even asked. I simply took the call in order to feel out my options, and get more information on what I thought to be Experts in the First Amendment Bar. I had already been contacted by the Attorney I did choose and was weighing my options. And trying to learn all I could for best of for all who do what I do, so I could make the right decision on the next step for the Greater Good.

Marc Randazza, almost lost me the Attorney I wanted, because Marc Randazza told the Attorney that he represented me. This was after my Attorney had heard through others of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was representing me.

Those believing I begged him to be my Attorney are Flat Wrong, think about it, why would I do that when I already had what I deem to be the most respected First Amendment Expert. A Legal Scholar who treated me with respect and focused on the Merits of the Case and nothing petty what so ever. I chose a man who is Respectful of my Rights and Talks kind to me, treats me with dignity even if he disagrees he is respectful about it and presents a very Intelligent, Sensible reason why he may disagree.

I had already spoke to this man, and read his incredible resume (Click Here to Read).

And yes I took a call to see what Marc Randazza Had to say, to offer, and out of respect for my Investigative Blogger whom contacted him. And I took the call to explore my options, thing is we did not speak again and next thing I knew, he was telling others he represented me and I had already agreed to work with the Attorney I chose. I had to contact Marc Randazza to tell him he did not represent me and why, I will be posting that email in Full coming soon. No one sentence pulled out as Kash-Shmear Hill likes to do, instead of investigate the entire TRUTH and Real FACTS.

Keep in mind this Plaintiff that Marc Randazza decided to align with was the same Plaintiff he was negotiating with in December of 2011, on my behalf and WITHOUT MY PERMISSION. Conflicts of Interest, Talking Behind the Potential Clients Back, Giving Away my Strategy, and completely disrespecting me and violating my right.

So Marc Randazza offered to buy the Domain Name, then Marc Randazza emailed and said you made your point what do you want and now he is Roaring that I extorted HIM, that is simply not true and is a Smoke Screen to cover up what he actually did to me.

Now Cut to David Aman, the Original Accuser of Extortion, and the One whom gave Forbes the infamous, false light defamatory email AFTER he had already won his case against me. See the Media Frenzy saying I am Guilty Until Never Given the Chance to be Proven Innocent, well they all got their Story from David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney for the Plaintiff. Yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney in his Frenzy to set me up for Extortion is still making me offers to Settle.

Yesterday, April 2nd 2012 David Aman, made and Offer to My Attorney to Settle. Why do this ? See David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney really wants to set me up for Extortion, he recently Deposed me and it was all about setting me up and previous income instead a real asset probe which would be about future income.

Last Week David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney threatened to file another Motion to Compel with Judge Hernandez to threaten and Harass me some more, this week an offer to Settle. It is all so convoluted.

Posted Here by
Crazy Crystal Cox
aKa - the Unhinged Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal Cox Marc Randazza WAR

More Regarding the Crystal Cox WAR against Lying Hypocritical Asshole Marc Randazza

Marc Randazza Violated my Rights, Exposed my Strategy, Negotiate for me with the Plaintiff without my permission, I am the Client, My rights were denied.
http://markrandazza.blogspot.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-violates-constitutional.html

Marc Randazza says Sandra Fluke is Butthurt, Marc Randazza is the One Butthurt
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-is-butthurt-hypocrite_30.html

Marc Randazza Defends Rush Limbaugh, Yet Attacks me for Calling His Wife a Slut and Buying Domain Names.
http://www.marcrandazza.com/search/label/Rush%20Limbaugh

Marc Randazza on the Wrong Side of Free Speech
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-on-wrong-side-of-free_30.html

Why in the World Defend the Owning of GlenBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlin1990.com and yet attack me for buying a name in a Dotcom? Oh I know, double standards.
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/i-dont-care-who-man-is-what-he-believes_30.html

This is what I sent Marc Randazza via Email, in my Pro Se Capacity after being Notified by Opposing Counsel that Marc Randazza had a Deposition in Portland. Marc Randazza Rejected this Document.
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/crystal-cox-pro-se-blogger-has-some.html

No Way is Marc Randazza a Friend to Domainers
http://markrandazza.blogspot.com/2012/03/domainer-crystal-cox-also-investigative.html

Post Here by
Altruistic Investigative Blogger
Reverend Crystal Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox Emails ( More Marc Randazza Emails will Be Posted Soon. The Marc Randazza emails before these Marc Randazza Emails.

The Great Debate of "Whom Extorted Whom" Continues.

I really think I do present the better legal case, don't you?

Oh Well It's all Just a Satire and Parody Anyway Right?
(for those who don't know, I make this joke because that was Randazza's
Defense in the WIPO Case with Glen Beck )

Marc Randazza spoke with me an Anti-Corruption Blogger who blogs on my blogs. This was on December 10th, 2011. Keep in mind time was critical at this point in getting a notice of appeal in or a Motion for a New Trial.

After the Phone Call I sent Marc Randazza lot's of documents, and last I heard he would read them to see if my argument was preserved enough to want to represent me and to see if he had a conflict of interest with the Media Bloggers Association.

Meanwhile, with Time Running out, I was weighing out all options. Another Attorney had contacted me on Dec. 6th, 2011 and said he wanted to represent me, but was waiting for clearance from his firm as this was completely Pro Bono and there was a process to go through. So I was not sure if he would represent me for sure or not. So I was still looking at other Attorney Options, and trying to see if it was even best to appeal, for I was going to do it Pro Se if no Attorney was on board. And wanted as many Expert as Opinions as I could, for this case matter to so many Whistle Blowers, Anti-Corruption Bloggers and Citizen Journalists.

So after the December 10th, 2011 Phone Call and Tons of Documents send, there was not another word from or regarding Marc Randazza until the 14th of December at exactly 5:06 PM when Marc Randazza Emailed me this, "

TO: Crystal L. Cox
December 14, 2011 5:06 PM

FROM: "mjr@randazza.com"

Crystal,

I have reviewed the file, and I have pondered the issues, and I have decided that I will take your case. We need to talk about some of the issues of representation before finalizing it. But, I am game.

When can you talk? "

How Ironic was that, as the Other Attorney had Emailed me at Exactly 5:00 PM regarding, hearing that Marc Randazza represented me, and wanted to know if he should call off the Pro Bono Process.

It seems that he had been told by others in the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented me, and so he called Marc Randazza up and flat out asked him. And it seems that Marc Randazza indeed claimed to be representing me, and even seemed to have spoke of a negotiation he was under way with as my "Attorney".

So of course acting as my Attorney he would violate my rights and negotiate without talking to me right? So just what was the terms of this negotiation on my alleged, behalf ? And if he did represent me in his own mind then how is it ethical to go to the other side with my strategy at that time. And how is it ethical to later, in a revenge over a domain name I refused to turn over to his demands, he went to the Plaintiff in this amazingly important First Amendment Case, and Side with them to Set me up for Extortion ? Did this secret negotiation giving away inside information and strategy acting as my attorney have anything to do with the Motion for a New Trial Process? What did Marc Randazza discuss with the Plaintiff's Camp? Is all this Legal? If so it is Certainly NOT ETHICAL.

Obviously the Reviewing and Pondering was well past, and Marc Randazza was acting as my Attorney. He emailed me he would take the case and told another Attorney he represented me, or so it would seem. Even though he made it clear to the other attorney that he had already been spending time and effort on this case.

So another words, Marc Randazza was acting as my attorney well before the 5:06 Email of Dec. 14th 2011, in which Marc Randazza finally let me, the client, know that he would take my case, though he had already told many he represented me, and had been already negotiating as my attorney.

It was recommended that I contact Marc Randazza and Let Marc Randazza know that he does not represent me. So My Response to Marc Randazza in the Above Email was The Following, and it was sent to Both Attorneys

"From: Crystal L. Cox
To: VOLOKH@law.ucla.edu; "mjr@randazza.com"
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 9:21 AM
Subject: from Pre Se Defendant Crystal L. Cox

I hope this email finds you doing well. I just want to clarify a few things as respectfully as I can.

Marc, it was nice talking with you, I do feel your working in the best interest of bloggers. After our conversation I sent documents, not even all, as you needed them another way, I never heard different and I prayed about our connection and its of the "greater good" and well Marc, when on the phone with me you told me I messed this up, thing is I am divinely led, and I did a great job, and in losing I got voice to the victims I fight for. I DID NOT MESS UP.

I filed tons of document, not the way you would of but they are in the public record, and also this trial, to me as it stands will be used to assist me in filing a Federal RICO Lawsuit and a Whistleblower Lawsuit, as I got them to perjury themself. And my goal is justice for all, and though an attorney may have got me out of this early, thing is there would have been someone else to sue me, or another to get sued to bring about the change in bloggers rights that this will bring. I did NOT mess up, and its important to me to be respected as the strong, intelligent, woman that I am, as my intention is really of the light, is good and ya sometimes I seem over the top but I am all heart on this, and my victims I will fight to the death for.

That's just who and what I am. You, Marc do not seem to respect me, or treat me as if I am worthy, equal to you, and it feels like you want your client, or possibly women in general to take a back seat to you and that's not me. And to confirm all this for me as I prayed for a sign, I heard thru several channels that you were saying you represented me, but did not give me the decency or respect to tell me or even keep me in the loop.

To not even email me back that you read any of the documents, to not contact me and then I hear your representing me. You said you may have a conflict and would let me know, you did not let me know and then seemed to tell others your were representing me, and you wanted money I don't have.

To me, after working 7 years at this, facing judges set me up, cops set me up, attorneys screw me over, death threats, being drugged, and extreme duress and persecution over all this for so long, well, you telling others you represent me BEFORE telling me, well that is on the wrong side of the moral and ethical compass to me. And is opposite of the equal rights, women's rights, lesbian rights, bloggers rights, citizen journalists rights, victims rights that I fight for.

Marc I got your forward last night, thing is I know the exact dollar amount of the transcripts, have known for over a week, and i know the court clerk email, been in this a year now. So that proves again you think me clueless, i have no money to get the transcripts at this time.

Eug ene spoke highly of you and even recommended you, thing is I will not speak with anyone on this from the law aspect expect Eu gene, if he can't represent me, I will not appeal.

As Eug ene represents what I fight for, and no disrespect marc just a tip for your future, Eug ene emailed me here and there and let me know what was going on, he listened to me, respected me and never once told me I messed up or EVER assumed anything about me. Nor did he speak of my journalistic standards as an issue, as you did. He never hesitated in wanted to represent me, it was simply a matter of if he could. He is Kind to me, smart and treats me with dignity and respect, you do not. Sorry that Simple.

So Just wanted you to know a bit why, and confirm, Marc Randazza does NOT represent me in ANY way. Eug ene Vo lok h represents me, and if he can't then so be it, I will leave that in the hands of the Great Spirit. I will not lose my voice, my dignity, and respect in this. I know my Truth though many others are trashing me, I know my truth.

The New York Times and Forbes are legally defaming me and inspiring a lynch mob based on one email that they refuse to discuss my side or even investigate the truth. I want to file lawsuits against them, and I intend to fight back.

I do not want to sit down and shut up, I do not want a back seat in this, though I dont want to interfere or tell an attorney whats best, thing is I know the clerks, the case, the documents and I just want respect for what I have done and not told I messed up.

I have lost my home phone, and internet, I am to be evicted on Monday, I keep fighting and blogging and I will no matter what. This last year I lost everything that was dear to me, and my life as I knew it, corruption has done everything to shut me down. So no disrespect Marc, I just don't like the way you treated me.

take care and keep up the great work for the better good of all victims of a corrupt justices system that makes victims out to be criminals. The Lie will NOT stand as the TRUTH on my watch. I am certain of my Fight, my Mission per say.

Blessings to You

In Love and Light,

Crystal L. Cox
Broker Owner

Search Engine Reputation Manager

Investigative Blogger

Good Life International Distributor

Peace and Love to You !!! "

Marc Randazza Responded 7 Minutes Later, Saying This,
and he copied the other Attorney,

"Friday, December 16, 2011 9:28 AM
FROM: "mjr@randazza.com"
To: Crystal L. Cox

"Ok, thank you for your email. I wish you the absolute best of luck in this matter. "

More From Marc Randazza

"Friday, December 16, 2011 12:55 PM

Crystal,

I want to address a few things:

First and foremost, if you feel that I did not treat you respectfully, I humbly apologize. I do not wish to leave that un-discussed. People like you are important for the future of citizen journalism, and I wish to see you succeed.

I also want to correct a misperception here. I did not tell anyone that I represented you, for certain. I did tell the opposing counsel that I thought a deal might be brokered - but that I wanted to speak to him first (to test his waters with respect to a possible mutually agreeable resolution).

Finally, I want to make it clear that our discussion about money was in terms of "costs." I thought that I made it clear that my bills, my fees (my income) would be waived. All that I was asking you about being able to pay was out of pocket reimbursement of expenses.

Despite the contents of this email, I wish to let you know that I am sill willing to lend a hand in any way - even in the background.

-Marc "

Response From Crystal Cox Blogger

"

Friday, December 16, 2011 2:03 PM

Thank You Marc I appreciate it, thing is again talking to the Devil to cut a deal without my permission is again disrespective. I consciously, intelligently chose not to deal, they sent a, what they call settlement communication a couple weeks before the trial, asking me to blame somebody they dont like, wanting 20 of my sites, and wanted me to pay 5000 for ever time i discuss them, even after i was granted a summary judgment to talk about them, and this is apparently not extortion... so i chose no deal... they did not prove that post not true, they tricked me, they lied, and i will not deal with them unless its a very good deal, they have put me through hell and now are persecuting me and setting me up for a crime..

one of my clients called this morning and said they got a call with somebody asking, so this means they have my bank account and are investigating me, yet for some reason not investigating the criminals.. so a deal would have to be very good.. and I would want in on it..

anyway thanks again for the apology.. peace and love to you"

Fast Forward to Monday January 16th, 2012, 2:30 PM. I thought I had left things on decent terms. A month had passed and having been evicted and a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgment, I was looking for work, so I email this to Marc Randazza.

"Hi Marc, hope this email finds you doing well. When I thought we may work together
i bought http://www.marcrandazza.com/ - to control the search, and pr on my case,
if you represented me.. I manage it now, as ownership is well.. a different story now
due to my current judgement..

I am confident with the case, and leaving it to the highest and best good..

I do however need to make money, so I am asking you if you or anyone you know could
use a very good search engine reputation manager. Not sure if you ever researched that
for your online presence.. not sure of what you think of David Aman excusing me of extortion,
thing is search management is something tons of people due and for thousands a month per search term..

and so when he sent a cease and desist and filed a lawsuit, i offered it as a way to settle and not
spend a year fighting, he turned it down, then a year later accused me of a crime.. its simply not
how it happened..

Anyway if you know anyone needing a very good search engine reputation manager please let me know.."

That is the email that he claims I extorted him. A domain name I bought Dec. 6th 2011, that I had every legal right to own. A legitimate service that thousands offer. And I had not written about Marc Randazza in any way what so ever at that time.

And though many love to speculate, what I meant by ownership is a different story, is that the Plaintiff was in the process of paperwork to take Domain Names that I owned or had owned, and that was one of them, so ya ownership is a different story as I thought the Plaintiff would take the Domain Name, and they still seem to be in the process of trying to do so. As they Deem the Domain Names and Asset, though at this point in time they certainly seem to be a Liability to an owner.

I never extorted anyone nor was there a Criminal Complaint Filed regarding extortion. What Follows is Extortion and threats from Marc Randazza if I don't turn over the name, and well he followed through with his threat, and now has other Lawyers, Bloggers, the New York Times, Forbes and more posting information that deliberately puts me in False Light and flat out lies. Marc Randazza is flat out lying about me and committing a Hate Crime in inciting a riot against me based on fraudulent information and Flat Out Lies.

Marc Randazza's Response to the Above Email

"TO: Crystal L. Cox
January 16, 2012 2:36 PM

Crystal,

You have no right to register a domain name that corresponds to my real name. Please hand that domain name over to me, and please do not presume to think it is okay to register other people's names as domain names.

________________________________________

Marc John Randazza*
Randazza Legal Group"

WOW, 6 minutes Later Marc John Randazza Responds.

So was that as an attorney, saying I have no legal right to register a domain name that corresponds to his real name or was that just his opinion? Wait now, before you answer, remember the Glen Beck Email and the WIPO case that Marc Randazza won over that, and remember the Crystal Cox, Proskauer Rose Lawyers and how I won the right to have those Domain Names, and I was Pro Se in that Case.

So then he goes to Please hand that domain name over to me, and please do not presume to think it is okay to register other people's names as domain names. REALLY, wow.. is that all you got... after defending others to own VERY sick names accusing someone of rape and murder right in the domain name. Ahhh Marc, ya big baby, it was just a Parody, a Satire...

Ok SO My Response Was

"Monday, January 16, 2012 3:23 PM

"Really? Well Marc, Look at my WIPO case with Proskauer Rose, WIPO sure seems to think its Ok. I thought it was perfectly legal to do so. I have registered others name in fair competition and real estate for years. I registered others names to promote them, some to expose them, and others as investments in the future. Many smart internet marketers register others names, it is not illegal Marc. Sorry I upset you, never mind. I was simply looking for people to promote as I need a job. Guess you don't need such a service, all you had to do was say no thank you. I am sure that you get tons of spam emails daily asking you to hire them, we all do. You could have just ignored it."

Marc Randazza sure did get into a huff over it.. Talk about Double Standards. He knows as an Attorney in this field of expertise that he was lying about my right to own that Domain Name.

I went on to say ...

"It is certainly not against the law to register the domain name of others. I was Pro Se with my Proskauer Rose case and I won, having many of their attorney names as a dotcom. Real free to file with WIPO, and be sure and name me in that case as well as the current registered name, as I proudly and smartly registered the domain name. We are happy to go to WIPO over it.

there are others but here is the chairman of Proskauer Rose, WIPO Case

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0679 "

Next Marc Randazza Says,

"From: Marc J. Randazza
To: Crystal L. Cox
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: from Crystal L. Cox

I'm not interested in WIPO. You want to make an enemy of me, really?

Marc John Randazza"

Crystal Cox's Response

"
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Crystal L. Cox
To: Marc J. Randazza
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: from Crystal L. Cox

How in the world did I make an enemy, I got it to protect the story, and the search term
as I thought you were going to represent me, and wanted to control the negativity I knew
I would get about it. That's what I do, I never did anything negative against you. And you
do care of WIPO, i read one of your bio things braggin about a WIPO case you won for someone.

No offense.. if asking you for a job, or to recommend a job made you an enemy, nothing I can do about that, certainly was NOT my intention in any way."

Marc Randazza Says,

"From: "mjr@randazza.com"
To: Crystal L. Cox
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:52 AM
Subject: RE: from Crystal L. Cox

Crystal,

Perhaps you just don't understand how deeply offensive it is to me that you would register that without even telling me, let alone asking me. You had no right to do that.

Do you think that just by being my potential client, or even my actual client that it somehow created a right for you to register my name to "protect the story?" Don't you think that I have a) the ability to do that myself, and b) the right to decide whether or not you would use my name for your own exclusive use -- to talk about YOUR story? Even if you thought that this was okay, which seems strange to me, why on earth would you think that you continue to have any justification for having that domain?

Asking me for a job, or a recommendation? That doesn't bother me in the least. In fact, if you had displayed any ethics, I'd be game to do so.

But, why on earth would you think that it is reasonable to tell someone that a) you registered THEIR name for YOUR own purposes, and THEN b) ask for a job? It is (a) that makes an enemy of me. (b) is completely reasonable.

I'm sure you paid a few bucks for the domain. I'd be pleased to reimburse you what it cost you. But, I do not find it to be acceptable that someone else has registered my name for any purpose. I certainly do not agree with your justification for doing it in the first place. Nevertheless, any justification you MIGHT have had dissolved when it became certain that I was not going to represent you, I have no connection to this case at all, and thus I can't possibly see any reason for you to have any control over that domain whatsoever -- unless the purpose is to simply make an enemy of me. "

Ok so Marc Randazza has no problem of me asking for a job, yet now in the Media is calling it Extortion, as part of the PopeHat.com Attorney Lynch Mob. Then Marc goes on to say well if you did have "any justification" then it dissolved " when it became certain that I was not going to represent you". Did you mean when I made it clear to YOU that you WOULD not Represent Me, because you Treated Me Badly and Disrespected Me? Oh I see, well if that's your legal case in this dispute, I bought the Name on December 6th, 2011 and I certainly was not "certain" at that time. So where is the Extortion you Lying Asshole?

Crystal Cox Responded to the Above Email with This

"Thanks for your input, confirms my choice regarding you. Fine if you want me as an enemy, so be it.

As far as my ethics, you have no clue who I am, I know my Truth. And I Trust you know yours.

There is nothing wrong with registering names, to further my cause, or protect my story in search. Or registering domain names to write news, events, and whistle blower tips on that person. It is a way to get stories in the top of the search, it is wise to have one's own name, you call me an enemy here so it is.

I will take no future job from you, I want no money from you. i will use the name to post current and archived internet stories about you, as I please, not defamation, simply word for word as I find them on
the sites of others. I have the right to repost articles of others and have received emails from many asking why I did not choose you to represent me, I had not responded. If you want your domain name, you will have to file a WIPO complaint, and or sue me for registering it and sue the guy I sold it to.

And maybe take a look at his story to and the surrounding corruption that is ignored. This is bigger then free speech Marc, it is about the culture of corruption in america and the lawyers, judges, cops, corporations that are either part of the solution or part of the problem.

You did not treat me well, for you believed what others said and did not even know that the story i was writing on was and is very true, that guy really did those things and I was just getting the story to the top of the search engines.

You asked for all my documents, said you would get back to me, and then told others you represented me. To me you are a bully, not ethical, as you said in your call you were not sure of me because of what was being said, thing is I am good at search management for good guys because of years of exposing, investigating, deep search on the "bad guys".

I turn up amazing discovering, and find out who is connected from monitoring my posts and the search engine placement has ex employees, ex wives and husbands, and tons of people sending me tips on that person, because i am so good at getting on top of search.

I gave voice to victims and the search placement happened by accident. After 5 years of it, i decided to offer it as a service, i have not got any jobs from it thus far, have not really tried heavily as I was employed as an investigative blogger by a big company out of new york to investigate connections
of people, which i am very good at deep online research and turning up tips.

And yes I have a "right" to register what I want, if you want that to NOT be a right you should have first bought the name years ago and secondly lobby the laws, so that the register cannot sell people's names to those who are not named that person. The registrar lets people register what they want, and perhaps those laws should change. However for me it is a tool to get in search and to uncover stories, post stories and make connections between things that person is or has ever been involved in.

As far as the domain name, It is not for sale at any price, for any reason. I currently don't own it and simply manage the name. You say in your email that your capable to registering the name?? why didn't you then? Be offended if you like, you offended me at our first call. Your an arrogant pompous
ass, and so thanks for letting me know that you are an enemy. So be it. I have faith that is meant to be, so let the WAR begin.. your Move..

I have every justification for owning that name, for one obviously i am smarter then you.

Slam me, say no ethics, and the rest of what you have said about me, well your FLAT WRONG about me, so be it, nothing I can do. You want an enemy of me, then fine, you have made that call. Let the skeletons in your closet start to rattle, hope your squeaky clean.

I have registered every name of the companies i have worked for in order to protect them in search, its just common sense Marc Randazza.

And you have NO connection to me in this case? Really, well rumor has it that you told people you represented me, and then later said other things about me, so I am not sure that is the whole truth and nothing but, at any rate I will not email you again... you have drawn your line in the sand.. do as you will I trust its meant to be.. "

Flash Forward to March 7th 2012, this was the Day that Tonkon Torp Attorney David Aman, for the Plaintiff in attempting to execute on a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement Signed a Subpoena to Marc Randazza. On March 8th as my own Attorney, in my Pro Se Capacity I get an Email with a Copy of the Marc Randazza Deposition Subpoena.

After this, the Use of MarcRandazza.com took a Turn.

Ok so on March 10th I am pissed off and want to Expose Marc Randazza before his deposition, so I buy FuckMarcRandazza.com - MarcRandazzaSucks.com ... and I publicize these names best I can, he knows they went up, I saw him on my Statcounter. Ok so then on March 12th I buy more names to keep building blogs on, such as MarcJRandazza.com and Marc John Randazza .com ..

So I Got notably into the Search Engines and

Marc Randazza Emails, Crystal Cox This

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "mjr@randazza.com"
To: Crystal Cox
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 12:37 PM
Subject: Ok

Ok, you made your point. So what do you want? "

I Did NOT Respond.

Ok at this point I am really PISSED, as Marc Randazza was planning on giving a Deposition and I assumed emailed me this to set me up for Extortion, so On the 13th of March I researched Deeper into the Marc Randazza - Sandra Fluke - Rush Limbaugh Scandal.

I pushed these as blogs and Marc Randazza certainly knew.. then on the 13th, after I was researching the Sandra Fluke Slut Comments and Marc Randazza in the Search Engines I found this post

Where Do Babies Come From ? Why a Drunken Tryst in Cabo San Lucas Of Course.
http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/
If it Gone Let Me Know, I have a PDF I can email you.

Anyway so then I thought to myself, what a Hypocrite, defending Rush Limbaugh and talking like this about his own knocked up wife. And there was her name so I took a look and there it was Domain Name Available, so I bought it and I bought the other one he is so upset about which I have never mentioned or publicized in ANY way, nor will I. It was bought to prove that Marc Randazza is not who he claims to be, OH in my OPINION.

As most of you know by now, I have bought the dot com of countless names of individuals over the years for various reasons. So why subpoena ONLY ONE of them in an asset probe? See what really happened is Marc Randazza was pissed, he wanted an easy way to steal the domain name instead of going through legal channels and filing a WIPO Complaint to go through a process of, if he really had a right to the Domain Name or Not.

So Marc Randazza seemed to have cut a deal with the Plaintiff, the very one he was going to represent me against. And so Marc Randazza was flying to Portland to give a Deposition regarding my assets. I was still pro see in the execution of a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement and all of the sudden the center of the entire case was now surrounding one $10 Domain Name that I purchased AFTER the $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement was Entered.

So I emailed this to Marc Randazza, as I am Pro Se, he emailed right back and said I do not open attachments from this email. So I sent it again in the body of the email. As my own attorney I have a right to ask these question..
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/crystal-cox-pro-se-blogger-has-some.html
I will be adding to, as the extortion set up and events surrounding it and PopeHat.com, Kenneth P. White, Kasmir Hill Conflicts of Interest, all this and more I WILL ASK in Marc Randazza's Deposition. As of this time, it seems he has not followed through with the Deposition. I will let you know if he does. If Not, then I will ask those questions, after I file my Lawsuit against them. This will be awhile as I am working on Criminal Complaints against Judge Marco Hernandez and Tonkon Torp, as well as Complaints to the Attorney General, and the Oregon Judicial Qualification Committee. As well as a Federal Hate Crime Filing.

Marc Randazza Deposition Subpoena
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/118010119/Randazza-Subpoena
If you can't read it and want to, Email me for a PDF -
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher - Media Bloggers Association Marc Randazza starts a WAR with Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and STOMPS on Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All.

Got a Marc Randazza Whistle Blower Tip?
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com OR WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

So Funny, Marc Randazza and David Aman Claims I Exorted them but they both made me offers I REFUSED.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 03:19:00 +0000

Marc Randazza offered to buy Marc Randazza.com long ago, though Kashmir Hill of Forbes has the story all wrong, and has not even seen the entire email communication between Blogger Crystal Cox and Marc Randazza nor does she know of the content of the Marc Randazza Crystal Cox phone call.

Anyway, Marc Randazza offered for the Domain Name, then he demanded, both I refused. Then Marc Randazza, to teach me a lesson, called the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to offer Testimony, a Deposition, to set me up for Extortion though I never Extorted Him. This because he was upset over me buying the Domain Name, which is certainly NOT illegal.

AFTER Marc Randazza Joined Forces with the "Bad Guys", the Plaintiff, and I, being my own attorney was given notice of Marc Randazza's Deposition to set me up, then I got upset and AFTER this, I bought several more dotcoms to prove a point, and noticing that Marc Randazza 's wife and daughter's dotcom was available, what better way to make the point of how bad he is at this "Domainer" thing, and how he is NOT the Internet Expert he Claims to Be.

See even after Marc Randazza threatened me for own his dot com and even though he defened Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , still he did not buy the dot com of his beloved, WHAT?

Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards. Was it extortion for the Glen Beck name to be purchased and used attacking Glen Back and accusing him of rape and murder? This Domain Name "implies"that a Young Girl is a "Minor" right? And it accuses a man of a Rape and Murder. This is Ok in the Eyes of Attorney Marc Randazza, but for some reason me Owning MarcRandazza.com is not, nor Owning JenniferRandazza.com and his childs name, which I bought AFTER he joined the plaintiff to PROVE and to prove Point, and I never Published that Information he did that. Popehat.com Kenneth White and Marc Randazza did that with her photo, as did Forbes Kashmir Hill. NOT ME.

Even after the threat to me for buying MarcRandazza.com, he still was to dumb to buy the dotcom of his own wife and child. I wanted to point out that he was a Fraud in his representation to Potential Clients, as I had interviewed Marc Randazza to possibly represent me, and he was so Disrespectful that I chose a better choice for me and for the Entire Blogger V. Journalist, Free Speech, First Amendment Rights Debate. I did not initiate connect with Marc Randazza, nor Him to me, we agreed to talk through the recommendation of another person, one of my Investigative Bloggers, whom was also on the call.

I never "Begged" Marc Randazza to be my Attorney, in FACT I never even asked. I simply took the call in order to feel out my options, and get more information on what I thought to be Experts in the First Amendment Bar. I had already been contacted by the Attorney I did choose and was weighing my options. And trying to learn all I could for best of for all who do what I do, so I could make the right decision on the next step for the Greater Good.

Marc Randazza, almost lost me the Attorney I wanted, because Marc Randazza told the Attorney that he represented me. This was after my Attorney had heard through others of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was representing me.

Those believing I begged him to be my Attorney are Flat Wrong, think about it, why would I do that when I already had what I deem to be the most respected First Amendment Expert. A Legal Scholar who treated me with respect and focused on the Merits of the Case and nothing petty what so ever. I chose a man who is Respectful of my Rights and Talks kind to me, treats me with dignity even if he disagrees he is respectful about it and presents a very Intelligent, Sensible reason why he may disagree.

I had already spoke to this man, and read his incredible resume (Click Here to Read).

And yes I took a call to see what Marc Randazza Had to say, to offer, and out of respect for my Investigative Blogger whom contacted him. And I took the call to explore my options, thing is we did not speak again and next thing I knew, he was telling others he represented me and I had already agreed to work with the Attorney I chose. I had to contact Marc Randazza to tell him he did not represent me and why, I will be posting that email in Full coming soon. No one sentence pulled out as Kash-Shmear Hill likes to do, instead of investigate the entire TRUTH and Real FACTS.

Keep in mind this Plaintiff that Marc Randazza decided to align with was the same Plaintiff he was negotiating with in December of 2011, on my behalf and WITHOUT MY PERMISSION. Conflicts of Interest, Talking Behind the Potential Clients Back, Giving Away my Strategy, and completely disrespecting me and violating my right.

So Marc Randazza offered to buy the Domain Name, then Marc Randazza emailed and said you made your point what do you want and now he is Roaring that I extorted HIM, that is simply not true and is a Smoke Screen to cover up what he actually did to me.

Now Cut to David Aman, the Original Accuser of Extortion, and the One whom gave Forbes the infamous, false light defamatory email AFTER he had already won his case against me. See the Media Frenzy saying I am Guilty Until Never Given the Chance to be Proven Innocent, well they all got their Story from David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney for the Plaintiff. Yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney in his Frenzy to set me up for Extortion is still making me offers to Settle.

Yesterday, April 2nd 2012 David Aman, made and Offer to My Attorney to Settle. Why do this ? See David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney really wants to set me up for Extortion, he recently Deposed me and it was all about setting me up and previous income instead a real asset probe which would be about future income.

Last Week David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney threatened to file another Motion to Compel with Judge Hernandez to threaten and Harass me some more, this week an offer to Settle. It is all so convoluted.

Posted Here by
Crazy Crystal Cox
aKa - the Unhinged Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal Cox Marc Randazza WAR

Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees - Objection to Fees of Tonkon Torp, Leon Simson, David Peterson, David Aman and Obsidian Finance Group, and Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group. Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees. Stephanie DeYoung Summit Bankruptcy Whistleblower and Others File Objection to the Fees of Tonkon Torp and Kevin D. Padrick.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:09:00 +0000

Stephanie DeYoung, Bankruptcy Whistleblower, Summit Bankruptcy Insider.

The Videos Below have Been Online Since July of 2009
Part 1 - Summit 1031 BK Reporting by Stephanie Studebaker-DeYoung

Part 2 - Summit 1031 BK Reporting by Stephanie Studebaker-DeYoung

$469,000 for 3 Months, WoW, Kevin Padrick sure was raking in the dough, and it is now several years later and last I noted at the end of January 2012, the Bankruptcy was Still open and Kevin Padrick was still raking in Money.

Perkins Coie 5 Months, $265,000

Tonkon Torp 3 Months $268,000.

Obsidian Finance Group $184,000. (They Were Supposed to HELP Summit and Instead Obsidian Finance Group Betrayed their own clients. They were suppose to create value. Obsidian Finance Group did not DO what they Said they would. Instead Kevin Padrick was working to get the Creditors Job)

Part 3 - Summit 1031 BK Reporting by Stephanie Studebaker-DeYoung

Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees

Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees of Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Obsdian Finance Group

Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees of Tonkon Torp Firm and Obsdian Finance Group. Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees David Peterson Tonkon Torp, David Aman Tonkon Torp, Leon Simson Tonkon Torp.

Blogger Crystal Cox was ALWAYS Reporting the Summit Bankruptcy Story, and Never Defamed Anyone. Crystal Cox Blogger was bringing you the News of what people inside the Summit Bankruptcy were Experiencing, Seeing. And the Documents, Audios and Videos to Back This UP. Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp Law Firm are NOT Innocent.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:00:00 +0000

Stephanie DeYoung, Bankruptcy Whistleblower, Summit Bankruptcy Insider.

The Department of Justice Trustee that Appointed Kevin Padrick as Trustee, at the EXTREME pressuring of Judge Randall Dunn, as we easily Note in the Audio, Pamela Griffith, she worked with Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp at a previous Law Firm and this conflict of Interest was duly noted in the Objection to the Fees in the Summit Bankruptcy filed by several insiders. This was also an Objection to the Fees of Obsidian Finance Group and with VERY Valid Reasons.

Pamela Griffith, Leon Simson and Kevin Padrick also all worked together at Miller Nash? Did Pamela Griffith's boss, the US Trustee Know all This? This is Serious and no one was or is paying attention to what goes on with the Creditors money in Bankruptcy Courts.

This is an issue that is Of Public Concern, your Tax Dollars Pay Pamela Griffith, Department of Justice Trustee and Judge Randall Dunn and this ALL has been something that both Stephanie DeYoung, Bankruptcy Whistle Blower and Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox have been shouting from the rooftop for 3 years.

We should be able to file a Qui Tam Lawsuit, a Whistle Blower Lawsuit under the False Claims act and get a percentage of recovery. If you are a lawyer wanting to represent in this, please email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

The Videos Below have Been Online Since July of 2009

Part 1 - Summit 1031 BK Reporting by Stephanie Studebaker-DeYoung

Part 2 - Summit 1031 BK Reporting by Stephanie Studebaker-DeYoung

$469,000 for 3 Months, WoW, Kevin Padrick sure was raking in the dough, and it is now several years later and last I noted at the end of January 2012, the Bankruptcy was Still open and Kevin Padrick was still raking in Money.

Perkins Coie 5 Months, $265,000

Tonkon Torp 3 Months $268,000.

Obsidian Finance Group $184,000. (They Were Supposed to HELP Summit and Instead Obsidian Finance Group Betrayed their own clients. They were suppose to create value. Obsidian Finance Group did not DO what they Said they would. Instead Kevin Padrick was working to get the Creditors Job)

There was no oversight in the Summit Bankruptcy, Period.

Pamela Griffith, Department of Justice, a Public Figure, WAS not acting in the Highest Fiduciary Honor, instead Pamela Griffith was protecting and serving her "Cronies". The FBI, IRS, Department of Justice, Oregon Attorney General, US Attorney General NEED to Take another look at all this. It has been brought to the attention of the Department of Justice, the Bankruptcy Courts, Several Federal Judges, Many Attorneys and they all still ignore what went on, even so far as to grant a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement to the Blogger Exposing the Story, that was really happening to these people involved and for years.

Pamela Griffith, Department of Justice, will be named in a Criminal Complaint and a Federal RICO Lawsuit, that I am filing in the next 3 months. Along with Perkins Coie, Tonkon Torp, Leon Simson, David Aman, David Brown, Patricia Whittington, Judge Randall Dunn, and many others.

Part 3 - Summit 1031 BK Reporting by Stephanie Studebaker-DeYoung

Patricia Whittington of Obsidian Finance Group Signed the Contract for Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group had with Summit, they all knew what was going on and even when an Insider showed the Department of Justice, Pamela Griffith and the Bankruptcy Judge, Judge Randall Dunn, the Conflicts of Interest, Documents of Proof, these "Officials" in the name of Highest Fiduciary Duty IGNORED what was going on.

Do your homework on the Summit Bankruptcy. This Very Transparent Bankruptcy is how there is so much room for corruption in the Bankruptcy Courts. There is no real oversight, NONE. And oftentimes those in charge are all in bed together raking in massive amounts of money, unchecked by those that your tax dollars pay to provide alleged oversight in the Bankruptcy process.

More Research Links

http://www.objectiontofees.com/2011/12/judicial-proceeding-objection-to.html

Insider Emails in the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy

http://www.objectiontofees.com/2012/01/insider-email-bankruptcy-case-08-37031.html

http://www.objectiontofees.com/2012/01/insider-email-bankruptcy-case-08-37031.html

http://www.objectiontofees.com/2012/01/kevin-padrick-email-to-steven-hedberg.html

http://www.objectiontofees.com/2012/01/kevin-padrick-claimed-at-one-time-that.html

http://www.objectiontofees.com/2012/01/possible-104a-bankruptcy-code.html

http://www.anonymous-insider.com/media/090211.wma
Audio of Court Hearing "Suggesting" Obsidian Finance Group

http://www.youtube.com/user/SAIBankruptcy

Summit1031BkJustice.com, From Stephanie's Blog, Stephanie DeYoung Whistleblower, Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, Oregon Bankruptcy Courts, Perkins Coie, Oregon Shield Laws, Freedom of Speech, First Amendment, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Patricia Whittington, Obsidian Finance Group LLC Vs. Crystal L. Cox, Obsidian V. Cox, Shield Laws, First Amendment Lawsuit, Defamation Lawsuit.

Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp Law Firm. On Whose Behalf is Kevin Padrick Working on this Particular Day? His Clients Summit or the Creditors whom he is the Trustee in the following Days. Kevin Padrick Claims to take pride in the work he does. We Do a Good Job. Really? Is this the Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing But?

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:49:00 +0000

Summit Bankruptcy - Crystal Cox was Reporting what was happening to those
involved in the Summit Bankruptcy. Video of Meeting with Kevin Padrick of Obsidian
Finance Group and his then clients Summit Accomodators / Summit 1031

". .. learn something that could hurt you? What?"

Dig into the "facts" of the Summit Bankruptcy Yourself and you will Easily Discover that Blogger Crystal Cox Made NOTHING up and was simply reporting the story of what was happening to those involved.

More Videos from This Meeting
http://www.youtube.com/user/KevinPadrick

More Videos on the Summit Bankruptcy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Jm4RuZ77bU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki14SZ8h6aU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcWH-3KJ4J8&feature=related

More Research Links

http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/01/investigative-blogger-crystal-cox-has_08.html

http://www.crystalcox.com/2011/12/homestreet-bank-files-objection-to-fees.html

http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/02/bankruptcy-judge-randall-dunn-portland.html

Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp Law Firm were BOTH involved in the Summit Bankruptcy and there was an Objection to their Fees filed by Insiders, Creditors, and Investors.

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications. Greg Euston is not a very Good Corporate Reputation Manager, that is for Sure. WR Grace has the WORST Reputation of ANY Company Ever. Greg Euston is working on the Reputation of WR Grace and Fred Festa. Greg Euston, McEachern Communication. Greg Euston of McEachern Communication. Greg Euston is researching Blogger Crystal Cox. Good Luck Greg Euston of McEachern Communications.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:29:00 +0000

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications is all over my blogs. It seems that Greg Euston is not a very Good Corporate Reputation Manager, though Greg Euston of McEachern Communications boasts about being such on the McEachern Communications website.

WR Grace has the WORST Reputation of ANY Company Ever in Existence. There really is no recovery for Fred Festa's gig WR Grace. As WR Grace is in bed with the Devil, in my Opionion.

WR Grace cannot take away lives, leaving suffering and despair in their wake and then hire Greg Euston of McEachern Communications to make it all better. Meanwhile decades of victims and their families are still suffering at the hands of WR Grace. Greg Euston is working on the Reputation of WR Grace and Fred Festa, and to do this is clumsily researching what I am say, and showing huge cyber footprints in doing so. Very Bad Idea Greg Euston of McEachern Communication. For I am the best at what I do, digging up secrets, showing who is in bed with whom, investigations and exposing pay offs and secret deals and getting the scoop that WR Grace CEO's don't want known.

The WR Grace Bankruptcy seems to be riddled with "secret hand shakes", I have just been to darn busy to dive into all the material that is out there on that.

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications is researching Blogger Crystal Cox, other wise known as Mad Dog Blogger, Crazy Crystal Cox, the "Unhinged Blogger and many other names with the point being I am the VERY BEST AT WHAT I DO. And that is EXPOSE the BAD GUYS like Fred Festa and guys like Greg Euston of McEachern Communications who cover for Fred Festa and WR Grace. So Good Luck Greg Euston of McEachern Communications.

Greg Euston, McEachern Communications is so bad at Corporate Reputation Management that I see him on my blogs, he is not good at Investigative Research Online that is a Given. And now that Fumbling Greg Euston of McEachern Communications has made such a ruckus on my blogs, odds are I will soon take over the search engines for the name Greg Euston, whom I had never heard of until Greg Euston of McEachern Communications. exposed his searching on my blogs.

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications is taking screen shots of my blogs, why is Greg Euston doing this? I mean why not email me, if I got it wrong, let me know.

Greg Euston is causing more of a PR problem for Greg Euston, McEachern Communications and WR Grace Fred Festa by sleuthing around on my blogs, as if he will figure out what I am up to or my motive?

See Greg Euston, McEachern Communications my family has died and is dying, but besides that WR Grace, Fred Festa sure seems to be in bed with Max Baucus, Senator Grassley and a few more regarding those Big Drug Companies that love to force Prescriptions that further harm people.

Greg Euston, WR Grace is one reputation that is pretty much impossible to clean up. Greg Euston, McEachern Communications, rumor has it in Montana that WR Grace has paid off judges to get judgements in their favor, knowing full well that WR Grace and the State of Montana knew what WR Grace was doing to the residents.

Greg Euston, McEachern Communications is researching what Blogger Crystal Cox has to say about WR Grace, thing is I have been very busy lately. I do intend to expose every detail of the layers of the WR Grace Bankruptcy, and all WR Grace's dirty deals, Lobbying and more. SO Greg Euston, McEachern Communications whatever you think your doing on my blogs, you, Greg Euston, McEachern Communications are accomplishing quite the opposite.

Greg Euston, McEachern Communications is so feeble at internet investigations he had to research how to find a "cached" site, and did this from my blog. Geez, not much of a Savvy Investigator that is for sure. Greg Euston, McEachern Communications is looking like a fool in my OPINION.

So who is Greg Euston, McEachern Communications. Well Let's take a look at Greg Euston, McEachern Communications.

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications is going to need an army of bloggers to defend the Horrible, Evil Reputation of WR Grace. I have family member recently diagnosed, family died painful slow deaths. I personally know hundreds of people that have died or suffered massively in the wake of the Evils of WR Grace. So WR Grace, Fred Festa GOOD LUCK with Covering UP the Sins of WR Grace, it is Impossible. Oh and the Judge, your "ALLEGED" to have paid of in Montana, and the other Politicians, Lawyers, and Cronies, well that too will not go away just because of pockets greased

Some Online Tidbits Regarding Greg Euston of McEachern Communications.

"Greg Euston is a senior corporate communications and public relations executive who provides strategic counsel and goal-oriented programs to his clients.

"Greg Euston

Greg Euston is a senior corporate communications and public relations executive who provides strategic counsel and goal-oriented programs to his clients. With 20 years of experience, he has helped companies with corporate reputation, CEO and senior executive communications, change management, crisis and issues management and public relations campaign development and execution.

Greg founded McGraw Euston Associates to work with organizations that need sound communications advice.

Prior to that he was a Senior Vice President for MS&L Worldwide where he worked with a range of companies in the healthcare, financial services, manufacturing and government arenas. During that time, he started MS&L Atlanta’s Environmental Business and Responsibility Practice to serve the agency’s government, non-profit and corporate clients and their natural resources and sustainability assignments.

Since 1999, Greg has worked with W.R. Grace & Co. senior management on restoring the company’s reputation following revelations of asbestos contamination in Montana and an unrelated Chapter 11 filing.

Greg’s experience includes economic development work with government agencies in Peru, Ind., Kettering, Ohio, and Caribou, Maine, each of which had lost a military base to partial or full closure. He also has worked with the State of Illinois to protect and promote the coal industry.

Recently, Greg led a comprehensive internal and external communications program supporting the launch of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals in the U.S., the result of Bayer’s acquisition of Schering AG.

Other relevant experience includes leading a major change management program at AstraZeneca and providing executive communications support to Schering-Plough during its turnaround.

Greg’s experience includes five years as a daily newspaper reporter in Fayetteville, N.C. and Winchester, Va. before entering public relations. He earned a bachelor of arts in journalism and American history from Washington & Lee University in Lexington, Va."

Source
http://www.mceacherncommunications.com/bios/bio-euston.html

Much more on McEachern Communications, Greg Euston Coming Soon.

As I intend to show you just how bad McEachern Communications, Greg Euston is at Corporate Reputation Managment, when he brags on his site who he works for and leaves GIANT dumb footprints all over the "Enemies" blog, website... Got a tip on McEachern Communications, Greg Euston ? Email your McEachern Communications, Greg Euston Tip to me Crystal Cox at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Bloggers are the Real News, Support Bloggers Exposing Corruption and doing the Work Newspapers and Investigators Refuse to Do

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:17:00 +0000

"So, what happened next, after an alleged secret meeting between then McHenry County Deputy, turned FBI Informant, Scott Milliman, and a couple Rockford based FBI agents turned sour?

According to Scott Milliman, at some point thereafter, a time frame I cannot quote with exactness, but at some point between this blowout in the Woodstock parking lot dated September 17, 2009, but before the 2010, McHenry County Sheriff's 'General Election,' Milliman claims he placed what would now be his second telephone call to the office of Chicago based, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald.

Milliman had disclosed that he had initiated one previous meeting with Mr. Fitzgerald which lead to his becoming an FBI informant to begin with. This I believe if my memory serves me correctly was sometime around 2006?

The now former deputy claims he got Mr. Fitzgerald's secretary on the line and he asked her if she remembered him. Milliman claims the secretary stated affirmatively that indeed she had.

Milliman then told me he told this secretary that he, Milliman, needed a second sit down meeting with Mr. Fitzgerald. I was told that Mr. Fitzgerald's secretary told Scott Milliman that she would speak with the U.S. Attorney and she would get back in touch with him.

I recall Scott Milliman telling me that he was surprised at how quickly the U.S. Attorney's secretary called him back telling him, "I spoke with Mr. Fitzgerald and he does remember you, and that he would be happy to meet with you again."

I do not recall how many days or what exact time frame passed since the day of this phone conversation and the day that the then "Still Active Duty, McHenry County Deputy Sheriff/FBI Informant Scott Milliman" actually allegedly went back to the Chicago offices of the U.S. Attorney. "

Check Out this Full Blog and Be Brave Enough to Blog about Corruption in your Area
http://www.dirtykeithvsdirtyharry.blogspot.com/

Cover Ups, Scandals, Council Members, the Mayor and More to Follow. Blog Exposing Corruption

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:09:00 +0000

"Gold Bar Reporters uncover connection between
Snohomish County and Gold Bar

Mayor Beavers covering up computer
crimes wth Gold Bar monies

On Tuesday March 20, 2012, Gold Bar city council member Kenneth Ware told Mayor Beavers that he was almost out of money for attorneys for 2012 - about $1,000 away spending his budgeted monies for 2012.

Gold Bar residents should be asking themselves one question " what's so important in Hill and Beavers emails that its worth spending over $450,000.00 taxpayer monies on?"

In February 2012, the Washington State Auditor's Office issued findings issued against Beavers for depleting public funds without prior council approval. An email from MRSC from Mayor Beavers documents that Beavers premeditated filing Bankruptcy over a year ago.

Late last year, Mayor Beavers accidentally released email communication which documents that Beavers is hiding email communication between two high ranking Snohomish County officials, Aaron Reardon and Sno Co Director of Emergency Management John Pennington, as well as Gold Bar's former Mayor Crystal Hill. Topic of conversation "mug shots."

In one set of emails, former Mayor Crystal Hill was writing and emailing Sno Co DEM John Pennington's appellate briefs which Pennington later filed in WA Court of Appeals Div. I. Other emails documents that Hill would often write Pennington's Superior Court motions and then disseminate Pennington's motions via county and City of Gold Bar computer systems.

One inside source said " Beavers is protecting Crystal Hill from being charged with practicing law without a license at our expense." But our investigation confirms that the crimes are much deeper than just Hill's practicing law without a license.

In one email from Sno Co Deputy Ross to John Pennington, Deputy Ross confirms that Crystal Hill, while serving as Gold Bar's Mayor abused a child in her care. Ross sends Sno Co DEM John Pennington an email, which seemed more like a brother sending an email, asking Pennington for comment on why Hill abused his minor six-year old child ( GP). Pennington writes back that Crystal and GP got into a fight about what kind of clothing she was going to wear to school...

Unfortunately for GP, Crystal Hill left bruises on the child and Deputy Ross, who has been strangely involved in two of Hill's investigations, doesn't pursue it any further. Residents should also note that Deputy Ross investigated the Marjele affair. In both cases, the investigation and criminal charges were never pursued.

Other emails document that several Snohomish County Sheriff's Officers are involved in tampering with evidence and thwarting a public records request seeking information about former Mayor Crystal Hill's abusing a child as well as the Majerle affair in late 2008.

One source said "Hill and Majerle were tampering with the water samples; Majerle knew too much hence why Hill pushed to pay him off in executive session and moved rather quickly to get him another job in Bellevue."

The Gold Bar Reporters received evidence that Mayor Joe Beavers and Sno Co Sheriff's Officer Barbara Gidos were tampering with public records in effort to remove damaging email communication between Sno Co's DEM John Pennington, Crystal Hill and Sno Co Sheriff's Officers Martin and Ross from 2008 to 2009.

John Pennington had a little help from his friends ( and former Sno Co DEM and FEMA employees) at Global Security Systems.

The story is much bigger than anyone of us ever dreamed, and when the time is ripe we will publish more. More to follow."

Source of Post
http://www.goldbarreporter.org/

Pro Se Defendant, Crystal L. Cox Investigative Blogger in Obsidian Vs. Cox, Soon to File Lawsuit Against Tonkon Torp Law Firm

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:24:00 +0000

Tonkon Torp Lawyers Sued by
Investigative BLOGGER CRYSTAL COX

Blogger Crystal L. Cox Soon to File Lawsuit against
Tonkon Torp Law Firm Based in Portland Oregon.

In approx. Six Weeks I am Filing a Lawsuit Against Tonkon Torp Law Firm for discrimination, harassment, violating my constitutional rights, denying me due process, interfering with the legal process, harassing me, threatening me, lying to me, lying about me to a federal court in which I have several incidents of proof, conspiring to harass and threaten me in order to force a deal, offering to work a deal with me in where by I would lie to a federal court and commit a crime in claiming the guilt of innocent parties, and in trying to scare, harass and threaten me into stopping my blog postings on Tonkon Torp Law Firm.

Keep in mind the very first "Settlement Communication", Offer to Settle from David Aman, Attorney for the Plaintiff, Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, David Aman tried to cut a deal where by I gave him my Domain Names at the time that were connected to Tonkon Torp Law Firm, and in this deal that was supposed to be on behalf of the "Plaintiff" Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, David Aman tried to get me to agree to never write anything on Tonkon Torp Lawyers or Law Firm EVER, and if I agreed to all that, well then the "Plaintiff" Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group would STOP the 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit. That sure does not sound legal to me, did the Plaintiff really want to PROTECT Tonkon Torp Lawyers and Tonkon Torp Law Firm from EVER being written on by my Investigative Blogger Network? Also keep in mind a Network of Blogs that David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer is still trying his best to claim ownership and control of, whether it is legal or not.

All Settlement Communications will be Exhibits in my Lawsuit as will be all emails inside the Summit Bankruptcy to and from Tonkon Torp Lawyers to the best of my ability.

This complaint / lawsuit will have documents of proof that Tonkon Torp was harassing me in order to cover up the involvement of Leon Simson, David Peterson, David Aman and others at Tonkon Torp Law Firm, with the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon and involving at least 5 states, and over 100 victims.

Crystal Cox alleges that Tonkon Torp broke the law and violated U.S. Bankruptcy Codes knowingly. Tonkon Torp Law Firm was involved in the Summit Bankrupty and even deposed an insider to ask about me 2 years before they sued me. Tonkon Torp Law Firm is still deliberately harassing me, Blogger Crystal Cox in order to attempt to cover up the involvement of Tonkon Torp Law Firm with the DOJ Trustee, and the Energy Lobby jobs that Tonkon Torp got after this now infamous Oregon Bankruptcy.

Tonkon Torp Law Firm is involved in fraud, as in David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer lying about an Investigative Blogger in federal documents and attempting to conspire with me to commit fraud. Also David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer was in communications with a man named Sean Boushie in Montana, in which a Federal Judge Called for an FBI investigation. Yet David Aman is still legally allowed to harass and intimidated me, this too will be in my Lawsuit against Tonkon Torp Law Firm.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer, lied to a federal court regarding my deposition in Montana in which he did not properly notify me and I was in the hospital with my then significant other, as I told David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer and of which he had no respect what so ever. David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm told the courts that I rejected a Settlement Offer and thereby was not cooperative, this was the first one, and it was a day before I actually rejected the offer.

This lawsuit will also Allege that David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer was involved in Jury Tampering in Obsidian V. Cox. And will provide Exhibits as to why I believe this to be TRUE.

I will demand a Declarative Statement be sworn to by David Aman, David Peterson and Leon Simson to answer all my questions. I will Depose them all, as I have every legal right to do so. And I will report on my story via whatever means of Blogging, Reporting I am left with after Tonkon Torp Law Firm is done harassing me.

I will soon be posting the draft of this complaint, and an open letter to Tonkon Torp Partners in which I will also email to Tonkon Torp Lawyers, Partners and Insurance Providers regarding this matter and the massive liability that Tonkon Torp's E and O insurance, Liability Insurance Carrier is taking on, over a few lawyers that seem to have violated bankruptcy code knowingly and have spent huge Tonkon Torp resources in trying to silence an Investigative Blogger. And attempting to stop me exposing the involvement of Tonkon Torp in the Summit Bankruptcy and Tonkon Torp connections to the Department of Justice Trustee that was to oversee the Bankruptcy and that Got Tonkon Torp the massive income opportunity in connection with Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.

Leon Simson Tonkon Torp

David Aman, Tonkon Torp even spent Tonkon Torp Resources to fly to L.A. to Try and Cut a deal with my new attorney to Silence ME.

Tonkon Torp sued me, and tried to cut deals in order to suppress information on a $40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy.

David Peterson Tonkon Torp

I will "Allege" in this Lawsuit that Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp Conspired with Department of Justice Employee Pamela Griffith in order to favor Tonkon Torp Law Firm in a $40 Million Dollar bankruptcy and the huge Energy Lobby deals that came with it.

I will "Allege" in this Lawsuit that David Peterson of Tonkon Torp knew of possible bankruptcy code violations in the Summit Bankruptcy and did nothing to bring this to the attention of authorities. As this internal emails that show David Peterson's knowledge of what was being alleged by attorneys and insiders and was IGNORED by Tonkon Torp Attorneys, though Federal Bankruptcy Laws seemed to be being violated and there were over 100 victims.

I will "Allege" in this Lawsuit that Tonkon Torp Conspired with Jim Diegel and Cascade Medical Center to stop information from getting to an Investigative Blogger Me.

I will "Allege" in this Lawsuit that the Summit Bankruptcy connections led to Energy Lobbying for the Tonkon Torp Law Firm in which OpenSecrets.org shows that Tonkon Torp was not previously involved in.

I will "Allege" in this Lawsuit that Tonkon Torp's connection to Enron and thereby Proskauer Rose is also part of a conspiracy to protect corrupt activities surrounding the iViewit Technology Case.

As per SEC Complaints, the Collapse of Enron is directly connected to the iViewit Technology and it's founder Eliot Bernstein, and the Proskauer Rose Law Firm. I allege that Tonkon Torp is harassing me to Protect the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology and now in Tonkon Torp Involving Eliot Bernstein and iViewit Technologies in Obsidian V. Cox, this is to suppress my blogs regarding the exposing of whitewashing for Elite New York Law Firms connected to the Case as exposed by Whistle Blower Christine Anderson out of New York. Tonkon Torp Lawyer David Aman is harassing, bullying Blogger Crystal Cox who is exposing this 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft. Tonkon Torp Lawyer David Aman is harassing iViewit Founder Eliot Bernstein in effort to silence blogs by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox that Expose the involvement of Enron, Proskauer Rose in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology.

Tonkon Torp Lawyer David Aman is trying to control blogs in which are named in Federal RICO Lawsuits, USPTO Complaints, Department of Justice and FBI Complaints, New York Supreme Court Filings and many more legal documents so that he can control the information on the domain names to stop the blogs from exposing criminal activity in the iViewit Technology case, the Summit Bankruptcy and the hundreds of other criminal conspiracies that Blogger Crystal Cox exposes.

Tonkon Torp Lawyer David Aman is doing this to protect the involvement of Tonkon Torp Law Firm in WHAT blogger Crystal Cox is exposing on her Investigative Blog Network.

I am also working on a Federal Hate Crime Filing (Bullied, Harassed, Biased Motivated), a Federal RICO Complaint, and Bar Complaints in several states in which Tonkon Torp Law Firm Does Business. As well as filing a Qui Tam (Whistle Blower Lawsuit) regarding Energy Lobbying, A Federal Bankruptcy and more regarding Tonkon Torp Law Firm and money they have got due to government proceedings and alleged dirty dealings. I will also be filing complaints with document of proof to the Oregon Attorney General and Oregon Governor. As I was always telling the truth to the best of my knowledge and ability and I continue to do so.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney has harassed Pro Se Defendant, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox for well over a year now. And David S. Aman seems to be above the Law, however, I intend to put that to the test as I file yet another legal proceeding with Tonkon Torp. See David Aman lied to Forbes Magazine, the New York Times, and Seattle Weekly about me and accusing me of criminal conduct. I have the Email he send to the Seattle Weekly defaming me, accusing me of a crime. David Aman, Intellectual Property Attorney for Tonkon Torp Law Firm out of Portland Oregon did this Knowingly and Deliberate in attempt to set me up and STOP the flow of information regarding the involvement of Tonkon Torp Lawyers in the Summit Bankruptcy Case and with Obsidian Finance Group and Energy Lobbying in General.

All this will Be in my complaint against Tonkon Torp Law Firm and if Portland Oregon Courts protect Tonkon Torp I will take it to a higher court. The Federal Hate Crime and the RICO Complaint / Lawsuit will automatically put this in a higher court.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer has Subpoenaed my banks, went over every detail of my life, and completely violated my human and civil rights, knowing full well that Oregon Retraction Laws did apply to me, knowing that I was telling the Truth and knowing full well I have every right to blog on Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group. David Aman, Portland Oregon Law, Continues to Harass me, Pro Se Defendant, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.

My counter claim was dismissed by Oregon Federal Courts which alleged similar activities by and with Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group.

Note: Many of you are emailing me about domain names I write on and asking if the Plaintiff is Taking the Domain Names. Folks, if they do, just email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, and I will tell you the story. It is Illegal for Tonkon Torp to do many of the things they have done to me over a year, and I shall meet Tonkon Torp Law Firm in Court over this. I am sure that the Corrupt, Lying David Aman who has lied about me at every turn in this case will control my blogs soon, and in that I will sue Tonkon Torp for even more.

This case WILL be overturned, as it is unjust, unlawful, unconstitutional.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer is deposing me Crystal Blogger on Thursday to discuss my alleged assets, to further harass me and to question me over my business and the domain names I use to make a living. David Aman has lied since the beginning of this lawsuit filing and I do not expect this deposition to be any different.

If David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer takes the domain names I used to make a living then so be it, this case will be over turned and he will have to give them back, I am not worried about this. I make a living from those names in conjunction with other people, and if David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer takes my livelihood, which is illegal then that is just one more thing that Tonkon Torp Law Firm will be liable for.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer will soon be asked to answer many questions by way of a Declarative Statement from me, in a Legal Battle whereby Tonkon Torp Law Firm and David Aman personally, will be a Defendant. David Aman and the Tonkon Torp Law Firm was involved in the Corruption I was exposing as an Internet Journalist and they continue to harass me to silence the truth. I will continue to file legal documents to prove that Tonkon Torp has done this to me in order to harass me into silence.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp is breaking the law, he is privileged to do so with his law degree, not much I can do about it. I am not breaking the law, nor have I. David Aman will be accountable one day to a non-corrupt court. This law degree also gives David Aman to get all my bank records without even having to show my bank an actual "judgement". David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer abuses his power and I will sue him for infringing on my legal rights to due process and constitutional law.

Tonkon Torp Law Firm

It will all come out that Obsidian Finance Group actually made business deals that show higher revenue deals and was simply trying to silence me to cover up the truth about Obsidian Finance Group, as I linked to documented proof, it was all to silence me and this will come out, lawsuit after lawsuits. David Aman can harass me, bully me, commit fraud and criminal acts against me, and still one day the TRUTH will come out.

Even if David Aman soon takes my access to domain names and thereby STOPS my ability to "edit" or make changes on those sites, and there by takes my income, I will still expose David Aman and the Tonkon Torp Law Firm for their involvement in all this. I will so via Press Releases, Legal Documents, Tons of Free Blogs, ebooks, PDF Documents, YouTube Videos, books registered with Bowker as I have lots of ISBN numbers registered to me as Nakaii Publishing. I Will find a Way to Expose them.

Justice Will Prevail Eventually

Let Go, Let God !!!

Also please Note:

Though I have complete faith that all will be as it should be, still I do believe that David Aman is capable of anything and if I should not return to this blog after my Deposition, well then assume the worse, as David Aman has been harassing and threatening me for over a year and the courts have protected him, thus far to do so with Free Reign. Also note I have a large fan base, and other bloggers who will continue exposing David Aman, Kevin Padrick and Tonkon Torp Lawyers in the event of my Death. I hope you, Reader will continue investigating Tonkon Torp, David Aman and Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, Patricia Whittington, and David Brown. For they are not above killing me, I have known this for over a year. So Again, Let Go, Let God.

Research Links on Federal Hate Crimes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime_laws_in_the_United_States

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/hate_crimes

http://www.ncjw.org/media/PDFs/rsrcehatecrimestpsfaq0509.pdf

http://www.againsthate.pdx.edu/about.htm

http://www.doj.state.or.us/hate_crime_report.shtml

Marc Randazza Defends Rush Limbaugh in ALLEGED Free Speech Rights, While Marc Randazza TAKES away the Rights of Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of ALL Bloggers and Citizens Journalists.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:46:00 +0000

Marc Randazza Says it is Un-American to pull Rush Limbaugh off the air, and Marc Randazza Seems to claim it Rush Limbaugh's right say what he wants to. While at the very same time Marc Randazza violates the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of Blogger Crystal L. Cox.

Marc John Randazza, Marc J. Randazza, Marc Randazza is the one who is un-AMERICAN.

Marc Randazza claims to be for First Amendment Rights, yet Marc Randazza threatened to make an Enemy of Blogger Crystal Cox because I bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is on some sort of media tour acting as if Marc Randazza Defends Free Speech, yet Marc Randazza is fighting on the WRONG side of Free SPEECH in Obsidian V. Cox ( Kevin Padrick Vs. Blogger Crystal Cox).

Marc Randazza does not seem to believe that the First Amendment, Free Speech thing applies to WOMEN. Especially Women who are Leaps and Bounds SMARTER then Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza is making quite a spectacle AGAINST women's rights. And Marc Randazza is defending the right for Rush Limbaugh to trash any women he pleases, while at the same time Marc Randazza is threatening me, Blogger Crystal Cox on making an

Marc Randazza is trolling in the Main Stream, Biased, Lying Media for A JOB. Marc Randazza is doing this by getting on the Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh Story. Marc Randazza is a Media Whore, and Get's Jobs however he see's fit. Crystal Cox Blogger, has the BALLS to straight out ask for a Job and Marc Randazza calls me Un-Ethical.

Marc Randazza is PISSED off at Blogger Crystal Cox, because I did not want his Arrogant, Egotistical Dumb Ass Representing Me. In Fact, I had announced that I would NOT appeal or go for a New Trial if I was not Represented by One Man, an Attorney whom did treat me with respect. And even when he disagrees with me, he explains it in a way that I know, HE Knows I have a BRAIN.

Marc Randazza simply took my information, betrayed the attorney client privilege in a way, as he said he was going to see if he had a conflict with those he represented and get back to me, Blogger Crystal Cox. Meanwhile, I was interviewing other Attorneys, as my Case is HUGE for the Rights of All Corruption Bloggers, Citizen Journalists, Victims Rights and Blogs, CPS Exposing Blogs and I take my responsibility VERY Serious. I will NOT Silence their VOICE. So I Chose an Attorney that I felt would have the Brains, Skill, Respect, Dignity and Honor to Represent these Strong Individuals, These Bloggers that give Voice to Victims that NO Other Media Outlet or System of Justice Can or Will.

I CHOSE Not To Go with Marc Randazza. And I, Crystal L. Cox Blogger, had NO IDEA that Marc Randazza was taking my "strategy" my private conversation in interviewing a potential attorney and GOING to the ENEMY per say. That was WRONG, Un-Ethical, Women Hating, Constitutional Rights Violating. And on top of that Marc Randazza asks me "Do you Really Want to Make and Enemy of Me", and sets out to seek revenge simply because I am better at this Internet Marketing Game then Marc Randazza, and had the BALLS to buy Marc Randazza .com

Marc Randazza Says, "Far too frequently, Americans find offense in another's art, music or other expression, and then they call for censorship. This is intolerable"

What a Crock of SHIT Marc J. Randazza, I mean certainly I Agree, thing is Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite. Marc Randazza slammed my "Journalistic Standards", Said I had no Ethics, Sought Revenge in making me his ENEMY as previously threatened by offering to give a Deposition AGAINST ME TO THE ENEMY. Marc Randazza wants to CENSOR Blogger Crystal Cox in EVERY Way, yet at the same time Double Talking Hypocrite Marc Randazza is in the Main Stream Media YAP acting as if Censorship is Bad, and people should be able to own whatever domain name they want even if it Accuses Glen Beck of Rape and Murder.

Marc Randazza is now YAPPING in Defense of Asshole, Woman Hater Rush Limbaugh and Marc Randazza is doing this just to get money, jobs.... as Marc Randazza is a Media WHORE. Yet Marc Randazza tells me I don't work for Big Media anymore because they told me they were trying to create a Monopoly so they make more money so I now work for Bloggers and Porn Stars. YEP that is what Ol Un-American Hypocrite Marc Randazza told Blogger Crystal Cox.

Well Fuckhead Marc Randazza it is Un-American for Rush Limbaugh to Slam, Discuss, Judge the Private Life of ANY woman, especially her Sex Life. It is Un-American for Rush Limbaugh, with his following to talk about a women in that way. However, I agree it is his Constitutional RIGHT, and it is not Illegal. And ya, Butthurt is Butthurt. What I do have an ISSUE with is Marc Randazza's double standards when it comes to Blogger Crystal Cox exposing Marc Randazza for what he really is.

Marc Randazza is a on the Wrong Side of Free Speech, the WRONG Side of Women's rights and the working against the First Amendment for All in the Obsidian V. Cox Defamation Lawsuit. ( Kevin Padrick Crystal Cox Lawsuit )

Source of Whiny, Butthurt, Full of Shit Marc Randazza Quotes Above
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/12/opinion/randazza-limbaugh-speech/index.html

Supporting Rush Limbaugh's right to slam women and at the same time Denying a Blogger the right to Free Speech because she bought a domain name, Big Daddy Marc Randazza did not approve of, this is NOT in Support of First Amendment Rights.

Marc Randazza has his Buddies Blogging to Promote What a Great Guy Marc Randazza is. Thing is that does not change the Fact that Marc Randazza tried to threaten a Blogger, a Domainer over a Domain Name with His Name in it, and work with the Plaintiff in a Major Free Speech Case Because Marc Randazza's Ego WON over the First Amendment Rights of All.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:00:00 +0000

Marc Randazza ~ now Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group, has his buddies blogging about Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group in an attempt for Marc Randazza to hide the Marc Randazza, Crystal Cox Scandal and Massive VIOLATIONS of my Free SPEECH and First Amendment Rights by Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza Scandal

Here are Some Marc Randazza Tidbits from this Marc Randazza Love Post
The Quote Posts are in BLUE, and the Source of the Quotes is Listed At the End.

"Marc Randazza sees the Rakofsky suit, and far too many like it, as an attempt to pervert the power of law to the cause of stifling speech. He leapt, almost unbidden, to the defense of the Rakofsky blawgers in need of representation. "

Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group is the one attempting to "pervert" power.

Marc Randazza is the KING of Perverting Power.

Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group tried to bluff Blogger Crystal Cox and tell me I had no right to own, buy and blog on Marc Randazza . com. Yet, Marc Randazza, defending others in Domain Name Ownership with the actual names of people and domain names themselves that accuse people of horrible acts. This is Ok to Marc Randazza, yet it is not ok for Crystal Cox, Blogger, Domainer to have purchased Marc Randazza .com .

Marc Randazza tried to pull a power trip over Crystal Cox, me and tell me I had no right to own Marc Randazza .com, which is simply NOT True. Marc Randazza STOMPS on my rights of Free Speech, and works against me in a case where if I don't get my case over turned, all BLOGGERS will be affected, no matter what the Lies of David Carr of the New Times is Telling You.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is the biggest case EVER regarding One Individual Blogger, that is Truly Independent, if Marc Randazza and the Plaintiff shut down my voice then this affects all Bloggers till the end of time, or the Internet as we know it.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is truly about a Blogger getting wind of a story and fighting for the victims, selflessly for 4 years and losing everything to stand up for what is right. The Obsidian V. Cox case is a case about finding information, digging through years of documents, getting tips and emails, reading document after documents, interviewing insiders, reading legal filings, reading contracts, listening to court audios, reading court transcripts and EXPOSING the inside details of a $40 Bankruptcy. The Obsidian V. Cox case is about the Plaintiff, Obsidian Finance Group trying to hide their secrets and what really happened and about David Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm protecting the involvement of Tonkon Torp, Leon Simson, David Peterson and David Aman himself in the Summit Bankruptcy.

David Aman is still fighting to silence blogger Crystal Cox, because David Aman was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal as you see in the Objection to the Fees filed by several insiders in that case. There was also emails to and with David Aman and the Department of Justice, and with other attorneys involved as they tried to Tell David Aman, Tonkon Torp of what was going on and how violated the rights of creditors and seemed to Violate Bankruptcy Code.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, knows that what Crystal Cox Blogger is saying is TRUE, yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm fights to take domain names to shut me down. Thing is Obsidian V. Cox will be overturned, TRUTH will win for REAL over alleged Defamation and investigators will really find out the TRUTH about the Behind the Scenes of the Summit Bankruptcy that they have for over 4 years ignored. David S. Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer knows that blogger Crystal Cox did not have actual malice and in fact had and has actual documents of truth, fact and anyone who can read can see that what Blogger Crystal Cox has and is Exposing has tons of documentation to back it up.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm fought for Kevin Padrick as Trustee in every issue over the Summit Scandal. And David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm even deposed Bankruptcy Whistleblower Stephanie DeYoung to ask about blogger Crystal Cox, yet did not contact me until 2 years later when I was Sued for 10 Million Dollars for EXPOSING THEM.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm is fighting to this day to try and shut down my blog, and this is to protect David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm and Leon Simson, David Peterson and others at Tonkon Torp, as they were involved in the alleged corruption I am exposing.

More on the above Blog Post Praising Marc Randazza

"I had heard of Marc Randazza prior to being named as a Rakofsky defendant, but I had never had any contact with him. His presence and reputation were known to me through his blog, The Legal Satyricon, and through the blogging of others, such as Scott Greenfield or Ken-at-Popehat who know him firsthand.

Marc Randazza is a zealot, but a zealot of the best kind. His zealotry finds its focus in the First Amendment, and particularly the portions of that Amendment protecting freedom of speech and expression. Speech, without regard to its couth, its coarseness, its wisdom, its dunderheadedness, its cultural value, its tendency to discomfit or offend, is embraced by the First Amendment, and Marc Randazza has devoted his career to its preservation. Like Horatius at the bridge, Marc Randazza stands beside the Sluice of Speech to defend it and to see that its flow stays as wide and as free and as indiscriminate as possible. "

This person seems to really like Marc Randazza, and to have had a good experience with Marc Randazza, I can respect that, thing is the facts of Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox are still the same. Marc Randazza really did violate my rights. Marc Randazza really did tell members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented me, and Marc Randazza really did contact the Plaintiff in my case to negotiate a deal on my behalf that I was not aware of. This violated my rights, gave the bad guys my strategy and inside information and was simply WRONG. Months later Marc Randazza really did contact the Plaintiff and offer to give a Subpoena to TAKE the Domain Names of Blogger, Domainer Crystal Cox in order to help the Plaintiff to silence my voice and the REWARD to Marc Randazza, I Believe, to be, Control over Marc Randazza .com .

Source of Quotes above in Blue.
http://www.declarationsandexclusions.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-marc-randazza-marc-randazza.html

Folks, email me for my story, I plan to post more as soon as I have time, thing is Marc Randazza violated my Constitutional Rights. Marc Randazza went to the "Other Side" in Obsidian V. Cox, after talking to me and Marc Randazza did NOT have my permission. Marc Randazza misled me, and Marc Randazza suggested I not appeal for the Good of Other Bloggers, which I was open to, if that was best, however Turns out Marc Randazza may have gave me bad information that may have affected the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers and Citizen Journalists.

Marc Randazza knows that the Oregon Retraction Laws Apply to Blogger Crystal Cox, Marc Randazza knows that Crystal Cox had no "actual malice" and that I, Blogger Crystal Cox, to this day believe, that there was foul play and illegal behavior in the actions of David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.

Check your Facts, they are there, Depose me, Marc Randazza, and all involved, check phone and email records and you will see that indeed Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff without the Defendants approval and Marc Randazza gave the Plaintiff privileged strategy and information regarding Blogger Crystal Cox. Marc Randazza told other member of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox, and that he, Marc Randazza had already spoke with the Plaintiff's side to negotiate a deal. Marc Randazza to these same folks that he represented me and this caused me more stress in my case, as I had to explain what happened with Marc Randazza, and that he did not work for me, even though he was putting in "time and energy" on my case, and acting as my attorney without my permission.

If Marc Randazza lies about all this then it's a feud among Lawyers on who is lying, as I have proof. The Marc Randazza article above, may well be one Marc Randazza opinion or Marc Randazza Experience, Thing Is it is Certainly not my Experience with Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group.

See Marc Randazza, and all reading this, I really am telling the TRUTH and anyone that can read, hear, see, can easily see that TRUTH.

Instead most, including Marc Randazza, simply believe FORBES, the New York Times and the Plaintiff's lies about me, as they fight to cover up $40 Million in Secrets, and this also makes Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp look bad to the Energy Companies they Lobby For, to those who issue Solar Tax Credits, to PacifiCorp, and more.

The Thing is, I am telling the Truth to the best of my ability and have been for years on this same matter. Look at the Summit Objection to the Fees, the Lake County Residents Upset at Obsidian, the Objection to the Fees in Washington filed Against Obsidian Finance Group for the SAME thing that Kevin Padrick did in the Summit Bankruptcy. There is easily proven pattern and history for a Federal RICO Lawsuit. And now Marc Randazza has jumped in the middle of it all in the alleged name of Free Speech and First Amendment rights, yet at the same time Marc Randazza, has violated my Free Speech and First Amendment Rights.

I Trusted Marc Randazza, and he betrayed me, Plain and Simple.

Marc Randazza REFUSES Answering my Questions, though I am Pro Se and Marc Randazza has been Subpoenaed by the Plaintiff, Allegedly.
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/crystal-cox-pro-se-blogger-has-some.html

Marc Randazza is a First Amendment Badass Alright and that is to TAKE our First Amendment Rights in being on the WRONG side of Obsidian V. Cox.

Marc Randazza Violates the Constitutional Rights of Domain, Blogger Crystal Cox as Marc Randazza aids in Stealing Domain Names and Setting UP Blogger Crystal Cox. Marc Randazza is mad because Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him as her attorney, and bought a Dotcom with his Name in It.

noreply@blogger.com (Whistleblower Media - Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:24:00 +0000

Marc Randazza, Celebrity First Amendment Attorney, is upset because Crystal Cox Blogger rejected Marc Randazza as her Attorney, and Marc Randazza, is fighting back by conspiring with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set up Blogger Crystal Cox. Marc Randazza, after getting secrets, and private information from Blogger, Domainer Crystal Cox, Marc Randazza is working on the Opposite Side of Crystal Cox and the opposite side of Free Speech and the First Amendment Rights of All.
Marc Randazza seem to have not done his homework on Obsidian Finance Group, or Kevin Padrick to determine if there a reason to investigate, or to believe that indeed Blogger Crystal Cox does have those Journalistic Standards or Ethics that Marc Randazza clams I do not have. I expose corruption, I am a VERY good investigative blogger and have wrote on this case for over 3 years. I am in the KNOW and have linked to documents of source and have been ignored. I was not noticed at all, nor was my whistleblower heard when she complained to a Federal Bankruptcy Judge, the FBI and the Department of Justice. I was not heard until I went "Over the TOP" with my language and made enough noise to get Eyes on Corruption.

See, Marc Randazza went to school to be a journalist, and does not seem to be interested in actual journalism, thing is I am. I am not interested in some standards set by the lying BIG MEDIA that controls information and calls it News. I post documents, Truth, Audios and Videos and I don't just call both sides and make up some version of reality, I post actual evidence, documents, court audios, contracts in FULL so that the Public can think for themselves.

If Marc Randazza cared to research my story before siding with the DEVIL Marc Randazza would easily see that Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group are in some major conflicts of interest; massive lobbying and solar tax credits issue, People in Lake County Oregon are very upset at their property rights being run over by Obsidian Finance Group, HomeStreet bank out of Washington filed an Objection to the Fees of Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, There is history of questionable behavior over the Longview Fibre Deal and Aloha Lumber, and the Oregon Trail Issues.

Marc Randazza is so upset that Blogger Crystal Cox bought Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza cannot see the clear merits of this case. And in this Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage of his hurt ego.

Marc Randazza’s ego is leading him around. Marc Randazza told Crystal Cox he was impressed with her, me, for standing up for and even being willing to not file an appeal for the Greater Good if that’s what he took. Marc Randazza told blogger Crystal Cox that it was very encouraging to hear that she would choose, to not appeal if that was best for lobby efforts and the good of all Bloggers and Citizen Journalists. And yet Marc Randazza, in a pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox is now working against the First Amendment Rights of all by working with the Plaintiff’s Camp in Obsidian V. Cox, in order to set up Blogger Crystal Cox, and to throw a fit over a Domain name that he was not smart enough to buy, Marc Randazza .com .

Marc Randazza, does not seem to care who is guilty of what. All Marc Randazza can seem to see is red, because Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him for being bullying, disrespectful and controlling and making deals behind her back and telling the WORLD that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox Blogger, when clearly he did not.

Marc Randazza has staged a Subpoena, even though he contacted the Plaintiff and offered himself up to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a Lesson. See, Marc Randazza is working with David Aman of Tonkon Torp in attempting to silence blogger Crystal Cox who is continuing to expose; Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Obsidian Renewables, Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice, Judge Randall Dunn, Perkins Coie Law Firm and Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Law Firm and Tom Stilley and Susan Ford, Miller Nash Law Firm, US Bankruptcy Code Violations in the Summit Bankruptcy, and events surrounding the Summit Accomodators Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon.

So What Happened?

How did I, Crystal Cox Blogger begin this pissing match with Marc Randazza, Alleged First Amendment Attorney?

See, after my $2.5 Million Dollar Set Up to “Attempt” to Hide the Secrets of Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp and other Big Oregon Law Firms and Corporations, well, one of my Bloggers contacted Marc Randazza and I agreed to a 3 way conversation to interview Marc Randazza, and he had agreed with my Blogger to talk with me in the possibility of taking my case.

During this call Marc Randazza said that if he took the case he would need money for a certain amount of costs and that it would be an expensive case to file appeal. He said, in a case like this he would normally charge at least $75,000. However, he was considering Pro Bono due to the Media attention I was getting, but even in that would need cost for copies and to be in a hotel in California for the appeal, if he or someone he recommended were to take the case.

Marc Randazza gave many signs during this call that Marc Randazza would most likely not represent me.
And told me that NOT Appealing may be the Best Answer. Marc Randazza never got back to me after this call. I heard later from other Attorneys that Marc Randazza represented me.

During this call Marc Randazza said he was concerned of the “record” and had to take a look at it before deciding. I said that was a responsible thing to do, he said he would look at my documents and get back to me, he did not get back to me, yet told others he represented me, more on that in a bit.

Marc Randazza told me on this call that I had “made a mess,” which I found very slamming as what I do is for the Greater Good and what I was exposing was and is on the right side of the law and certainly on the right side of the Moral Compass.

Marc Randazza saying this, let me know that he had no idea that what I did was a ‘calling,’ it was for massive change and a good thing to bring attention to this issue. Marc Randazza treated me as if I had made a “mess” and with complete disrespect. When in fact, I am creating “Media” and “Legal” attention to something that is VERY important for the Greater Good of ALL.

Marc Randazza said that he was concerned with my “Journalistic Standards”, SHOCKING isn't it, a Porn Company Attorney representing folks that "Society" judges and Marc Randazza is judging and slamming my “Journalistic Standards”? Anyway this disrespectful comment led me to believe that Marc Randazza seemed to have been eating up the bad information about me, this was another sign to me that Marc Randazza was not going to represent me.

I am an Investigative Blogger. And a Very Good ONE. For Over 3 years, I have read contracts, insider emails, legal briefs, documents, LLC Agreements, Legal Filings, depositions, All the documents in Objection to Fees Filed against Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group by Summit Insiders and I listened to Audio’s of Court Sessions, watched videos of depositions and insider meetings and I interviewed, and yes took notes from the side of the Debtors, Investors, Creditors and more in the Summit Bankruptcy, deeper than any other news outlet. I have covered this story in depth and linked to lots of proof and documentation.

The Media Bloggers Association should pay close attention, as what I was doing was exposing documents, and linking to those documents, and this is what most all bloggers do. The fact that I curse, Capitalize in Odd Places and have my own "Independent Style", well that make me legally "media" as well, and it does not change the Facts. I do what ALL good Investigative Bloggers, Alternative News and Citizen Journalists Do.

There is no way that I don't have an Independent Product and the Oregon Shield Laws, Anti-Slapp Laws, and CERTAINLY the Oregon Retraction Laws SHOULD apply to me. Though I published that Blog Post while living in Boulder Colorado and was sued as a Resident of Montana, out of a Federal Court in Oregon.

Big Media wants to shut me up, so they lie about me, and for some reason Marc Randazza ate up what Big Media said about me, even though it was NOT True. Marc Randazza did not care about my side.

Marc Randazza simply ran me over with his personal opinions and agenda. Marc Randazza says if I were not so UnEthical he may hire me. What? Marc Randazza has no idea what Ethical Is.

Marc Randazza told me that he used to work for Big Media but now he works for bloggers and porn stars, because Marc Randazza claimed that Big Media had the agenda of creating a Monopoly so they make more money. Yet NOW Marc Randazza is working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox.

Marc Randazza told me that he would have to talk to his existing clients, such as The Media Association of Bloggers, to see if there was a conflict before deciding to represent me or not. Marc Randazza claimed he would get back to me on this. Instead, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff’s side and tried to cut a deal WITHOUT my Consent, without “getting back to me” and without discussing if he represented me, wanted to represent me or if there was a Conflict.

Meanwhile Marc Randazza, of The Media Bloggers Association (MBA) , told lots of people in the “business” that he represented Blogger Crystal Cox, yet that was NOT True. I had agreed to work with another Lawyer and this created a situation that caused me stress, and almost lost me the Lawyer I really wanted.

Did Marc Randazza have to “discuss” a conflict with the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) in any way BEFORE Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff’s side and tried to work out a deal, as if he represented me?

I was told at that time by other members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was talking with the Plaintiff’s side and trying to work out some arrangement regarding money, or a change to case law. I was Pro Se for a year and I wrote over 50 Court Filed Documents myself. I was and AM in the KNOW on my Case and Marc Randazza simply left me out, THE CLIENT, out of the LOOP, as if I had no brain, no rights and with total disrespect for me, Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza simply and certainly, unethically took it upon himself to contact the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian V. Cox, without my knowledge and without getting back to me on if he wanted to work with me or not, Marc Randazza simply left me hanging with time running out and was working behind my back on a deal. Is this Legal? Well it is certainly NOT Ethical and certainly shows no respect for bloggers nor the First Amendment Rights that Marc Randazza, Allegedly wants to protect.

I want to Sue Marc Randazza, if I can find a Good Attorney who will represent me on contingency, email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com if you know of one.

Also on that first phone call Marc Randazza said he thought it was funny that the Plaintiff thinks they can get $2.5 Million out of me, and now Marc Randazza has offered himself up to help them get any assets they think I have and ESPECIALLY that $10 Domain Name, Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza NEVER Registered for himself.

Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to take Domain Names, which is my only way to make a living, and all in the name of “Constitutional Rights” What? This makes no sense and is NOT True.

Marc Randazza is Vindictive, plain and simply. He was not chosen in the BIGGEST case that the blogsphere has EVER seen regarding one blogger, and a case that will change laws and is already a world wide phenomena and that blogger, me, had the nerve to buy Marc Randazza .com and to even suggest that Marc Randazza hire me to do PR for him. Marc Randazza is so mad that Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage of Marc Randazza’s EGO.

In one of Marc Randazza’s last communications to me he said “do you really want to make an enemy of me?” Marc Randazza thinks that a blogger, a woman, being smarter than him is making him an enemy.

So Marc Randazza is on a mission to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson and be “Deposed” to rant about me to the Plaintiff to attempt to further quash my “Free Speech” and First Amendment Rights, and thereby affecting all BLOGGERS, Citizen Journalists and Alternative Media Worldwide.

Marc Randazza told me that if I appeal it MAY create Bad Law and that maybe I should consider NOT appealing so that my case can be used to Lobby for others in changing laws. I was in agreement, and told Marc Randazza that I simply wanted advice from those surrounding the First Amendment Rights Issue and the First Amendment Bar, so that I could do what was best for all Bloggers, Citizens Journalists and the First Amendment Rights of All.Marc Randazza said he was very glad to hear that, and it made him want to work with me even more, or so he "Alleged" at the time.

Marc Randazza said, if I take your case then my Ethical Duty is to you, yet Marc Randazzaacted as if he had taken my case, without talking to me about it, and was already negotiating with the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian Finance Group Vs. Blogger Crystal Cox.

To me, Crystal Cox, this says that Marc Randazza was already acting as my attorney, and did have an Ethical Duty to me to not disclose my stance, emails, or private conversations with him. Yet Marc Randazza contacted the “Other” side to Negotiate, and that was in December. Now Marc Randazza is using information I gave him directly against me in a Deposition that Marc Randazza is giving the "Plaintiff" to attempt to put me in my place and to take a $10 Domain Name that Marc Randazza was not smart enough to buy, and this, in my opinion, is an Ethical Breach, if not Plain Ol’ Illegal.

Last December I found out that Marc Randazza was Negotiating with the Plaintiff’s Side OF MY LEGAL CASE without my PERMISSION. I was told this by other members of the First Amendment Bar that wanted to represent me.
They had heard that Marc Randazza represented me and even spoke with Marc Randazza, and he had flat out claimed to be representing me, yet Marc Randazza had not told me he was even still considering representing me, Blogger Crystal Cox.

I was told by other Attorneys that I needed to let Marc Randazza know that he did not represent me, because Marc Randazza was telling everybody that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox on Appeal of Obsidian V. Cox (I have Emails and more to Prove this).

Marc Randazza has so little respect for potential clients that Marc Randazza simply does as Marc Randazza pleases without his client’s or potential client’s knowledge.

Can I Sue Marc Randazza for trying to make a deal, acting as if he was my attorney without my consent? I certainly can file Bar Complaints in NV, CA, MA, FL, and AZ to Start.

Marc Randazza is now part of a Witch Hunt to discredit blogger Crystal Cox, in effort to protect Big Corporations such as Obsidian Finance Group, Pacific Power, Government Oversight people such as Judge Randall Dunn and Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice and Law Firms such as Tonkon Torp, Sussman Shank and Perkins Coie.

Marc Randazza is sacrificing the Free Speech rights of ALL in Marc Randazza’s own personal Ego trip over a blogger that bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is NOT a man for the rights of Free Speech. Marc Randazza is a man for the personal EGO Trip of Marc Randazza.

So how is Marc Randazza working with the “Bad Guys”

and on the Opposite Side of Free Speech?

Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to set me up. Marc Randazza is pretending to be under subpoena and pretending to have no choice, but the truth is that Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff, and Marc Randazza initiated dealing with them against me because his EGO is bent that I did not CHOOSE him and I bought Marc Randazza .com.

Marc Randazza is even flying to Portland to be deposed at the Tonkon Torp Law Firm. The Day After I will Be Deposed in Spokane Washington, and I will BE Demanding my Rights to Question Marc Randazza and to be Present at that Deposition. I am Pro Se on this Matter.

And all this, because they want to Silence a Blogger Exposing Corruption and to spite a Pro Se Defendant who went with a different lawyer and had the nerve to buy a domain name with Marc Randazza's name in it.

Marc Randazza is on an Ego Trip and it affects all Bloggers, yet Marc Randazza acts as if he works for the best interest of Bloggers and for the best interest of the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) .

Marc Randazza does not work for the best interest of Bloggers, nor of the Best interest of the First Amendmant. Marc Randazza is on an Ego trip for Marc Randazza and so in creating a war over a domain name that he was too dumb to buy and in being pissed off because I told him I did not want him to represent me, well now Marc Randazza is working directly against the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers.

So Who Is Marc Randazza ?

Marc Randazza , Marc John Randazza of Randazza Legal Group with offices Miami, Phoenix & Toronto. Marc Randazza is an Attorney Licensed in Arizona, Nevada, California, Massachusetts, and Florida.

Marc Randazza is in the News these days saying that Sandra Fluke is Butthurt over Rush Limbaugh calling her a slut and has no right to sue, yet Marc Randazza is helping to take my livelihood and Silence My Voice. This seems like such a Double Standard.

Marc Randazza claims to fight for the First Amendment rights of all. Marc Randazza is an Attorney specializing in protecting porn and online gambling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza )

According to wikipedia.org, Marc Randazza’s first case was representing a fraternity at Boston University, when the brothers of that fraternity were accused of destroying a house they had rented and accused of other misconduct. Marc Randazza then began practicing in Florida as a real estate attorney. Marc Randazza seems to have started right out working for the wrong side of the law and certainly the wrong side of the law in representing drunken fraternity brother’s who seem to have destroyed some one’s property.

Marc Randazza, according to wikipedia, “Soon thereafter, moved to Orlando, Florida where his practice in First Amendment and media law expanded. He started representing defendants in SLAPP suits, pornography businesses, and protesters, in often unpopular constitutional law matters.”

Marc Randazza seems to have started right out of the gate on his First Amendment Soap Box defending those seemingly on the wrong side of the law and the wrong side of the moral compass.

Yet Marc Randazza slams me for “Journalistic Standards” and works directly against a blogger whom he had acted as if he once worked for in this same manner. Marc Randazza told me that I made a mess of my case. Thing is who is making a mess now Ol’ Marc Randazza?

Marc Randazza is a Public Figure, indeed having been in debates on Fox news and other television and having worked for Big Media as Marc Randazza told me. So why are there not more bloggers EXPOSING Marc Randazza ? Well I guess, Marc Randazza really was for blogger’s rights, until he got all BENT over Blogger Crystal Cox and decided to be part of taking down the Free Speech Rights for ALL Bloggers.

According to wikipedia, “"Randazza has a practice that primarily focuses on the areas of First Amendment litigation, adult entertainment, trademark and copyright litigation, and domain name arbitration disputes." So you see Marc Randazza, has to save face and punish mesomehow because I am Smarter than Marc Randazza.
Marc Randazza represented people in WIPO cases yet claims he does not care about my WIPO case with Proskauer Rose Law Firm out of New York, in which I Legally won the right to own the names in dispute.

This is a case precedence of my Legal Right to buy Marc Randazza .com, and though Marc Randazza is some big deal in Domain Name Arbitration,Marc Randazza did not have the Brains to buy Marc Randazza dotcom.

Now Marc Randazza has teamed up with David Aman of Tonkon Torp who, along with his “Plaintiff” Kevin Padrick was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal and named in the Objection to Fees in the Summit Bankruptcy in which several insiders filed to Object to the Massive Conflicts of Interest and Outrageous Fees involving Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick

More on that at the Link Below for Now (if Links are Broken due to stolen Domain Names, email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com for a copy of the Objection to Fees in Summit and in the Homestreet Bank Scandal involving Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, as well as other documents of those who really do and have had issue with Obsidian and Kevin Padrick )

http://www.ObjectionToFees.com/

Sure must be a low blow to the Massive Ego of Marc Randazza to have been trumped by a blogger, and a Woman. Marc Randazza is one of those classic examples of Attorneys who simply shut you up and toss you in the back seat of a legal case as if he is smarter and can handle it, which obviously Marc Randazza is not smarter then blogger Crystal Cox even if Marc Randazza is conspiring to set up Blogger Crystal Cox to protect his Ego.

According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza has “represented a number of well-known adult entertainment companies including Kink.com, Bang Bus, and Milf Hunter. He also represents media businesses such as BME and bloggers in SLAPP suits.” So the Porn King Attorney Mark Randazza is all for Freedom of Speech, ... well EVERYTHING, except a Woman Being Smarter than Him and buying a dotcom of MarcRandazza.com. Marc Randazza can’t have that, so he is off to Portland to a Deposition of the Asset’s of Crystal Cox in order to conspire to set up Blogger Crystal Cox and teach her, me a lesson for being SMARTER than Ego Maniac Marc Randazza.

Maybe his buddy David Aman will Take the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com, which I bought after my Judgement and Maybe David Aman, attorney for Obsidian Finance Group, will simply GIVE the domain name Marc Randazza .com to Marc Randazza then he can STOP Crying over it.

Marc Randazza is Directly against the First Amendment Rights of Blogger Crystal Cox in her buying Marc Randazza .com. Yet Marc Randazza defends others in outrageous domain name ownership case.

Though Marc Randazza tells me he don’t care about WIPO, yes Marc Randazza actually said that in an email to Blogger Crystal Cox, anyway, According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza “has represented the defendant in Beck v. Eiland-Hall, a case before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) filed by political commentator Glenn Beck, ...The WIPO arbitrator ruled against Beck in the case, and in favor of Randazza's client.” Yet when I told Marc Randazza that I had represented myself in a WIPO case over an Attorney’s name and won, he said he did not care. Yet it sure seems that Marc Randazza is proud of his WIPO case win, in my opinion, of course.

SO what was the Beck V. Eiland-Hall case, and just what was Marc Randazza defending as a Free Speech right? Well the Domain name in that dispute was,(www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") .

Marc Randazza says I have no right to own a domain name that corresponds to his name, GeezMarc Randazza did not think that in this domain name(www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") I Guess that is just those double standards of Mr. Marc Randazza popping up again.

So Marc Randazza fought for the right for his client to own the domain name,"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" - as you see at this link http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody
Hypocrite Marc Randazza thinks it is OK for his client to buy and own a sick domain name such as that, that accuses a man of rape and murder, but it is not OK for me to own Marc Randazza .com.

Seems a bit of a double standard, don't you think? It is not ok to own that kind of a domain name, it is sick, it accuses a man of rape and murder and yet is defended by Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza knows all about WIPO, and Copyrights, and Intellectual Property so why not just take the Domain Name? Why get on the Bandwagon of the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to Stomp on the Free Speech Rights of All Citizen Journalists and to deliberately STOMP on the First Amendment Rights of every United States Citizen who my case, Obsidian V. Cox now represents in Free Speech Issues?

You see if Asshole Marc Randazza had a Right to take the Domain Name then he would right?

So why work with the "Bad Guys" to steal the domain name, because he wants to make a point and steal the Domain Name he was not smart enough to buy. And all with the Collateral Damage of the Rights of Free Speech of Every Blogger World Wide, and of the First Amendment Rights of Everyone, Period?

Marc Randazza thinks, as you will see in the emails, that I should have asked him before I bought Marc Randazza Dotcom, gee did his client ask Glen Beck if they could buy "GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" ? I bet NOT.

Marc Randazza is simply pissed off at a Woman who did not want to let him represent her, ME, even For Free, because he was an arrogant aggressive ass to me and because he went behind my back making deals BEFORE I even agreed to be his client. I have more respect for myself than to let a BULLY, Lying, Thug Such as Marc Randazza represent me, even if for FREE.

Marc Randazza is so mad at me for not choosing him, and at me, Blogger Crystal Cox for buying the Asshole's name as a dotcom, that Marc Randazza is making the World his Collateral Damage in a Marc Randazza pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox.

Thing is, no matter what you Pricks set me up for, the TRUTH remains to be the TRUTH, the Criminal in all this REMAINS to be the Criminal, Kevin Padrick remains to be suspect of White Collar Crimes, and all those involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal will remain to have been involved, and your foul play, ethics violations and double standards will one day bite you in the ASS. As the TRUTH has a way of rising to the TOP. I have Faith.

Marc Randazza is all for Free Speech and First Amendment Rights, but only in his selfish, delusional world of what Free Speech is and that does not seem to include citizen journalists exposing corruption or Internet Marketers who are Smarter then Marc Randazza and buy his dotcom.

Marc Randazza obviously needs Internet Marketing help, so I offered it to him as I do everyone I can. It’s what I do, I would like to make money at it. Marc Randazza has his panties so wound up around his you know what, he just can’t think. So instead of defending the First Amendment and those trying to expose corruption, Marc Randazza contacts the Plaintiff to work against the Pro Se First Amendment Defendant and on the Opposite Side of First Amendment Rights. And why? Because I bought MarcRandazza.com and he was too dumb to buy it so now he wants to conspire to silence me.

Does Marc Randazza know that David Aman is alleged to be under an FBI Investigation over his connection to a man in Montana who tried to intimidate me to get me to take David Aman’s “Settlement Communication” which offered me a deal, if I commit a crime “ and just swear that people committed a crime that they did not, well then he would generously let me out of a 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit, is this Legal?

See That Post Here
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/david-aman-attorney-for-plaintiff-kevin.html

And if you want to order the hearing transcript of the alleged FBI Investigation that hearing is called “Motion to Exclude Sean Boushie,” it is a matter of court record.

So what ever happens in the WAR between Crystal Cox (not a Porn Star) and Marc Randazza, First Amendment Attorney fighting for the rights of Porn Stars, and other Adult Entertainment First Amendment rights . . . well whatever happens, my intention on my first talk with Marc Randazza was to listen with an open mind, in the possibility of Marc Randazza representing me, and buying MarcRandazza.com, well that is just what I do, I buy the names of those who are part of stories that I come across or involve me. The domain name was available, and so I bought it. I am for hire for PR, and Search Engine Marketing, I offer that service.

Marc Randazza is a Bully, and is now working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox as Marc Randazza does not believe I have a legal right to own or to have bought MarcRandazza.com, a domain name which you would think ol’ Marc Randazza would have owned long ago.

So why hasn’t Marc Randazza simply filed a WIPO complaint if Marc Randazza has the legal right to own Marc Randazza .com ? Well you see it seems like more fun and more vindictive for Marc Randazza to work on the opposite side of Free Speech and First Amendment Rights and instead set up blogger Crystal Cox with his Good Ol’ Buddies at Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group in which Marc Randazza attempted to make a deal with them, financially on my behalf BEHIND MY Back and when he did not represent me.

Yes, I am under the impression that back in December, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff to make a deal on my behalf for them to change the judgement so it would not affect the Porn Industry Free Speech, and this was to be in my best interest. And I was told that at that same time Marc Randazza claimed to many in the First Amendment Bar, that he represented me, and yet Marc Randazza had not told me, the “Alleged” Client. In my Opinion, based on my personal experience I do not recommend nor trust Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza, seems to me to work on the OPPOSITE side of Free Speech in order to teach a female investigative blogger a lesson for being smarter than him.
Marc Randazza was not offered the chance to buy Marc Randazza .com, NO WAY.

He will only get the name if he files a WIPO complaint, or sucks up to Plaintiff Kevin Padrick and his Attorney David Aman, if they seize the Domain Name and give it to Marc Randazza in some deal possibly made to set up, to silence blogger Crystal Cox for exposing; Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Obsidian Finance Group and their connections to Oregon Solar Credits, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Judge Randall Dunn, Blue Heron Paper Company, Department of Justice Pamela Griffith, Perkins Coie Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Susan Ford and Tom Stilley, Miller Nash, Bonneville Power, Lake County Oregon Commissioners, the Bend Oregon D.A. Office.

Marc Randazza claims to be a Copyright Expert, so if there is a Legal Reason that Marc Randazza should get to own Marc Randazza .com that Marc Randazza was to dumb to buy, then why doesn’t big shot Domain Name Arbitration Lawyer Marc Randazza, simply TAKE Marc Randazza .com by force instead of working in the dark, in back alleys and side deals with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, which is looking to be the biggest case of Free Speech For Bloggers that the Blogsphere has ever seen in quite this way?

And if it is NOT Legal to buy Marc Randazza .com if I am not Marc Randazza, then why in the world is it Legal for Godaddy to Sell the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com?

I hope that Randazza Legal Group owns Randazza Legal Group .com, as I won a WIPO Case for ProskauerLawFirm.com, you know what WIPO is, right Asshole?

Stay Tuned for Crystal Cox Vs. Marc Randazza Part 2 AND more as the Pissing Match Continues. The next Part will have emails between Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox Blogger and explanations of communications from my point of view, of course. This will also include my Email to Marc Randazza rejecting him in representing me because Marc Randazza is an arrogant Ass and was disrespectful to me.

Got a Tip on Marc Randazza? I would love to know.
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, Crystal@CrystalCox.com,
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.comCrystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
ENEMY of Hypocritical, Egomaniac Marc Randazza

Marc Randazza is a BULLY. Marc Randazza SPOUTS Double Standards, Lies, and Hypocritical Hype to Get Attention on Media WHORE Marc Randazza. Meanwhile, Marc Randazza is WARRING against the First Amendment Rights of ALL Bloggers.

noreply@blogger.com (Whistleblower Media - Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:05:00 +0000

Marc J. Randazza on his CNN Hypocritical YAP.

"(CNN) -- I despise Rush Limbaugh. I despise almost everything I have ever heard him say. I wish that he were no longer on the air. That is why I write today to defend him against those who call for him to be silenced.

Far too frequently, Americans find offense in another's art, music or other expression, and then they call for censorship. This is intolerable.

The First Amendment stands for principles like that espoused by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. Barnette: "Of there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein."

Or that wisdom given to us by New York Times v. Sullivan, "Debate on public issues ... [should be] ... uninhibited, robust, and wide-open."

The First Amendment requires neither tact nor politeness. It requires that we permit all views to set up stalls in the marketplace of ideas, and we let that marketplace decide which ideas prevail.

Rush Limbaugh has a right to his views.

Just as important, his fans have a right to hear him. Those of us who disagree with him have a right to fight him, but we must do so on our own. Using the government to support our view is constitutionally intolerable. Trying to bully him off the air is wrong."

Marc Randazza, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza Quote Source Link
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/12/opinion/randazza-limbaugh-speech/index.html

Marc Randazza despises Rush Limbaugh, I Despise Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza is helping the courts to silence Blogger Crystal Cox, yet acting as if Marc Randazza is all for free speech and is saying that it is intolerable to use the Government to Support this, yet Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox to use Governmental Process to to stop my "view", my voice.

Marc Randazza says that trying to bully Rush Limbaugh off the air is wrong, yet BULLY Marc Randazza has threatened to make an enemy of me and Marc Randazza is working with Tonkon Torp Lawyer, David Aman to BULLY me "off the air". Talk about Double Standards.

All because Marc Randazza is BUTTHURT over Blogger Crystal L. Cox buying a Domain Name that "resembled" his name, yet its ok for his client to buy, own and use a Domain Name accusing Glen Beck of Raping and Murdering a Young Girl. This is WRONG, Sick and immoral in every sense and Marc Randazza won that case.

Marc Randazza does NOT stand for First Amendment Principles when it comes to a Female Investigative Blogger that does not stand down to his bullying. Yet Marc Randazza claims in this CNN article to be all for First Amendment Principles, that is a LIE, a Gimmick to get Marc Randazza business.

Marc Randazza says that as in New York Times v. Sullivan that debate should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open" however NOT when it comes to a Debate against Marc Randazza or a Blogger Standing up for their Rights against Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza quotes law and says, "no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein." Yet Marc Randazza is part of taking away the rights of Blogger Crystal Cox and Marc Randazza is certainly quite petty about it.

Marc Randazza says that "Rush Limbaugh has a right to his views." even if they trash a woman, call her a slut and other foul names, yet Marc Randazza does not think that Blogger Crystal Cox has a right to her views in this same regard. Marc Randazza is a hypocrite. Marc Randazza is a Liar. Marc Randazza double talks.

Marc Randazza is using every tactic available to try and censor blogger Crystal Cox, ME, and at the same time slamming others for doing the same thing to Rush Limbaugh.

Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite, Plain and Simple.
Marc Randazza is a BULLY.

More on the CNN Yap by Marc Randazza Coming Soon. Here is a Marc Randazza story link for you to ponder, as Marc Randazza is flat out full of shit on this one.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/12/opinion/randazza-limbaugh-speech/index.html

Blogger Crystal Cox, Pro Se Defendant in Obsidian V. Cox, Emails Marc Randazza to REJECT him as Her Attorney, even for Free.

noreply@blogger.com (Whistleblower Media - Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:04:00 +0000

Marc Randazza STOMPS on First Amendment Rights, as Marc Randazza Sides with Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox. Marc Randazza was rejected as the attorney of Crystal COx and now Marc Randazza has contacted Tonkon Torp Law Firm David Amen to Give a Deposition Against Crystal Cox Blogger. Marc Randazz of Corbin Fisher, Randazza Legal Group making a Mockery of Freedom of Speech, simply because Marc Randazza is Butthurt.

Email where I Told Marc Randazza that
He did NOT Represent me and Why I Did Not Choose Him

" Original Message --------
Subject: from Pre Se Defendant Crystal L. Cox
From: "Crystal L. Cox"
Date: Fri, December 16, 2011 9:21 am
To: "mjr@randazza.com"

Marc,

I hope this email finds you doing well. I just want to clarify a few things as respectfully as I can.

Marc, it was nice talking with you, I do feel your working in the best interest of bloggers. After our conversation I sent documents, not even all, as you needed them another way, I never heard different and I prayed about our connection and its of the "greater good" and well Marc, when on the phone with me you told me I messed this up, thing is I am divinely led, and I did a great job, and in losing I got voice to the victims I fight for. I DID NOT MESS UP.

I filed tons of document, not the way you would of but they are in the public record, and also this trial, to me as it stands will be used to assist me in filing a Federal RICO Lawsuit and a Whistleblower Lawsuit, as I got them to perjury themself.

And my goal is justice for all, and though an attorney may have got me out of this early, thing is there would have been someone else to sue me, or another to get sued to bring about the change in bloggers rights that this will bring. I did NOT mess up, and its important to me to be respected as the strong, intelligent, woman that I am, as my intention is really of the light, is good and ya sometimes I seem over the top but I am all heart on this, and my victims I will fight to the death for.

That's just who and what I am. You, Marc do not seem to respect me, or treat me as if I am worthy, equal to you, and it feels like you want your client, or possibly women in general to take a back seat to you and that's not me. And to confirm all this for me as I prayed for a sign, I heard thru several channels that you were saying you represented me, but did not give me the decency or respect to tell me or even keep me in the loop.

To not even email me back that you read any of the documents, to not contact me and then I hear your representing me. You said you may have a conflict and would let me know, you did not let me know and then seemed to tell others your were representing me, and you wanted money I don't have.

To me, after working 7 years at this, facing judges set me up, cops set me up, attorneys screw me over, death threats, being drugged, and extreme duress and persecution over all this for so long, well, you telling others you represent me BEFORE telling me, well that is on the wrong side of the moral and ethical compass to me. And is opposite of the equal rights, women's rights, lesbian rights, bloggers rights, citizen journalists rights, victims rights that I fight for.

Marc I got your forward last night, thing is I know the exact dollar amount of the transcripts, have known for over a week, and i know the court clerk email, been in this a year now. So that proves again you think me clueless, i have no money to get the transcripts at this time.

xxx spoke highly of you and even recommended you, thing is I will not speak with anyone on this from the law aspect expect xxx, if he can't represent me, I will not appeal. As xxx represents what I fight for, and no disrespect marc just a tip for your future, xxx emailed me here and there and let me know what was going on, he listened to me, respected me and never once told me I messed up or EVER assumed anything about me. Nor did he speak of my journalistic standards as an issue, as you did. He never hesitated in wanted to represent me, it was simply a matter of if he could. He is Kind to me, smart and treats me with dignity and respect, you do not. Sorry that Simple.

So Just wanted you to know a bit why, and confirm, Marc Randazza does NOT represent mein ANY way. xxx represents me, and if he can't then so be it, I will leave that in the hands of the Great Spirit. I will not lose my voice, my dignity, and respect in this. I know my Truth though many others are trashing me, I know my truth.

The New York Times and Forbes are legally defaming me and inspiring a lynch mob based on one email that they refuse to discuss my side or even investigate the truth. I want to file lawsuits against them, and I intend to fight back.

I do not want to sit down and shut up, I do not want a back seat in this, though I dont want to interfere or tell an attorney whats best, thing is I know the clerks, the case, the documents and I just want respect for what I have done and not told I messed up.

I have lost my home phone, and internet, I am to be evicted on Monday, I keep fighting and blogging and I will no matter what. This last year I lost everything that was dear to me, and my life as I knew it, corruption has done everything to shut me down. So no disrespect Marc, I just don't like the way you treated me.

take care and keep up the great work for the better good of all victims of a corrupt justices system that makes victims out to be criminals. The Lie will NOT stand as the TRUTH on my watch. I am certain of my Fight, my Mission per say.

Blessings to You

In Love and Light"

Marc J. Randazza Says, "It's un-American to silence Limbaugh" while at the same time SILENCING Blogger Crystal Cox Because Marc Randazza is BUTTHURT.

noreply@blogger.com (Whistleblower Media - Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:01:00 +0000

Marc Randazza does not seem to believe that the First Amendment, Free Speech thing applies to WOMEN. Especially Women who are Leaps and Bounds SMARTER then Dumb Ass Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza is trolling in the Main Stream, Biased, Lying Media for A JOB. Marc Randazza is doing this by getting on the Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh Story. Marc Randazza is a Media Whore, and Get's Jobs however he see's fit. Crystal Cox Blogger, has the BALLS to straight out ask for a Job and Marc Randazza calls me Un-Ethical.

Marc Randazza is PISSED off at Blogger Crystal Cox, because I did not want his Arrogant, Egotistical Dumb Ass Representing Me. In Fact, I had announced that I would NOT appeal or go for a New Trial if I was not Represented by One Man, an Attorney whom did treat me with respect. And even when he disagrees with me, he explains it in a way that I know, HE Knows I have a BRAIN.

Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite. Marc Randazza is a Butthurt, Whining Baby. Marc Randazza is a Thieving Little Shit. Marc Randazza is Un-American and Marc Randazza is all those NAMES he calls OTHERS.

Marc J. Randazza Says, "It's un-American to silence Limbaugh". But at the Same Time Marc John Randazza conspires to silence a VERY important voice to ALL victims of the Culture of Corruption in America, Blogger Crystal Cox who really is FIGHTING with all I HAVE to give voice to victims, and to Fight for the Constitutional Rights of those whom are violated by the Justice System they Pay to Protect them.

Marc Randazza Says, "Far too frequently, Americans find offense in another's art, music or other expression, and then they call for censorship. This is intolerable"

What a Crock of SHIT Marc J. Randazza, I mean certainly I Agree, thing is Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite. Marc Randazza slammed my "Journalistic Standards", Said I had no Ethics, Sought Revenge in making me his ENEMY as previously threatened by offering to give a Deposition AGAINST ME TO THE ENEMY. Marc Randazza wants to CENSOR Blogger Crystal Cox in EVERY Way, yet at the same time Double Talking Hypocrite Marc Randazza is in the Main Stream Media YAP acting as if Censorship is Bad, and people should be able to own whatever domain name they want even if it Accuses Glen Beck of Rape and Murder.

Marc Randazza is now YAPPING in Defense of Asshole, Woman Hater Rush Limbaugh and Marc Randazza is doing this just to get money, jobs.... as Marc Randazza is a Media WHORE. Yet Marc Randazza tells me I don't work for Big Media anymore because they told me they were trying to create a Monopoly so they make more money so I now work for Bloggers and Porn Stars. YEP that is what Ol Un-American Hypocrite Marc Randazza told Blogger Crystal Cox.

Well Fuckhead Marc Randazza it is Un-American for Rush Limbaugh to Slam, Discuss, Judge the Private Life of ANY woman, especially her Sex Life. It is Un-American for Rush Limbaugh, with his following to talk about a women in that way. However, I agree it is his Constitutional RIGHT, and it is not Illegal. And ya, Butthurt is Butthurt. What I do have an ISSUE with is Marc Randazza's double standards when it comes to Blogger Crystal Cox exposing Marc Randazza for what he really is.

Marc Randazza is a Jack Ass. Ignore is Whiny Dribble Best You Can.
Tons more on This Coming Soon.

Source of Whiny, Butthurt, Full of Shit Marc Randazza Quotes Above
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/12/opinion/randazza-limbaugh-speech/index.html

Marc Randazza Blog. Fighting Copyright Trolls. Is there Pattern and History in Marc Randazza's Behavior? Marc Randazza is KNOWN to be "the Most Hypocritical Troll". I would have to AGREE. Marc Randazza is Working AGAINST Free Speech and the First Amendment in Obsidian V. Cox.

noreply@blogger.com (Whistleblower Media - Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:00:00 +0000

Why Did Marc Randazza really contact the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, BEFORE Marc Randazza let his potential client know that he was going to the Plaintiff's side and discussing my personal information, my strategy? Was Marc Randazza trying to see if he could WIN, before he was hired for or took the job as attorney for Crystal Cox Blogger? Was Marc Randazza trying to make a deal with the Plaintiff, behind the Pro Se Defendant's back in order to change "bad law" for his Porn Company Big Wigs, whom Marc Randazza told me called him and asked what he was going to do about the Crystal Cox Case?

Did Marc Randazza have a legal right to talk toCrystal Cox Blogger, me, and discuss being my attorney, yet not agree to such and then take my private information to the Plaintiff to cut a deal that did not involve me ?

The Plaintiff's Attorney in Obsidian Vs. Cox is not just any attorney, the Plaintiff's Attorney, David Aman and the Tonkon Torp Law Firm was involved in the Corruption that Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox has been exposing for over 3 years. Blogger Crystal Cox was getting information found in the search engines regarding the Summit Bankruptcy and the Objection to Fees that Named Tonkon Torp. David Aman Knew This, as in the Stephanie DeYoung Deposition. So when Marc Randazzacontacted Tonkon Torp, Marc Randazza was telling my information to the very guys whom I was exposing. Marc Randazza had no right, as far as I am concerned to discuss my business with the Plaintiff's side WITHOUT involving me in any way or letting me know what Marc Randazza was up to, allegedly on my behalf.

Marc Randazza don't Know that I Played Texas Hold Em' for 18 Years and Well I certainly have the BALLS to call his BLUFF. So seeings how I called his bluff demanding I give him Marc Randazza.com, now Marc Randazza is in bed with the DEVIL and affecting the First Amendment Rights of us ALL.

I am considering filing a Federal RICO Complaint Against Marc Randazza, as tonight I see there is Pattern and History in Marc Randazza's tactics.

Here is an Article from a Blog Called "Fight Copyright Trolls".

Title of Marc Randazza Article on FightCopyright Trolls Blog
"Do you still think that talking to plaintiff’s lawyer is a good idea?"

"I’m never tired of repeating over and over again that talking to plaintiff’s attorney (a copyright troll) directly, not through your own lawyer, is not only a questionable idea, but just a plain stupid idea. Reading numerous comments on TorrentFreak, ArsTechnica, Techdirt and other discussion boards, I sometimes see someone bragging: “If I received a call from a troll, I would tell him…” Wrong! You don’t want to tell him anything. Just hang up. Ignore emails and scary ransom letters¹."

"TAC has pointed to a very-very sad story: a guy from one of the mass Liberty Media Holdings lawsuits received a call from an attorney notifying him that his IP address was recorded in connection with sharing a copyrighted material on BitTorrent, demanding money and asking questions. Instead of hanging up, this guy did the worst thing possible: he answered the questions and admitted that he downloaded that damned movie! He explained that he did not know that it was illegal, probably thinking that a reasonable copyright holder who cares about its business would say something like “ok, you are a good guy, and we appreciate the interest in our studio products, what you did was illegal, please stop doing that and here is the URL where you can buy and enjoy our products legally”.

Note, however, that here we are not talking about copyright holders who are interested in retaining fans and promoting their products. Instead, we are talking about scum of the Earth, disgraced attorneys who can’t think about anything but money right now with as little investment as possible. Ruining someone’s life for a $40 movie is something that these vampires wouldn’t hesitate to do if it could possibly bring them a couple of dollars."

"Marco Randazza, the most hypocritical troll as of today"

Source of Marc Randazza Post and Full Marc Randazza Article
http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2011/10/14/do-you-still-think-that-talking-to-plaintiff%E2%80%99s-lawyer-is-a-good-idea/

Marc Randazza Quote
"“We did get a satisfactory payment from the prior defendant,” Randazza said. “And while we don’t expect to get $1.75 million from Mr. Brown, we do expect to extract something from him.”
http://www.fortiumtech.com/article.aspx?id=405
WHAT a LOSER AssHole.

Marc Randazza Talks a Good Game for Freedom of Speech and First Amendment Rights, However Marc Randazza DOES not Walk the Talk when it comes to his own Butthurt EGO Trip and the First Amendment Rights of Others. Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite, a Liar, an Asshole and has Violated my First Amendment Rights.

noreply@blogger.com (Whistleblower Media - Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:58:00 +0000

What Do Sandra Fluke, Ted Klaudt, Rush Limbaugh, Isaac Eiland-Hall, Blogger Crystal Cox and the Double Talking First Amendment YAP of Marc Randazza Asshole have in Common?

Marc Randazza Emails Blogger Crystal Cox and Demands She Turn over Marc Randazza .com, even though Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and Corbin Fisher, has fought for others to own domain names with people's name and even worse.

Though Marc Randazza knows that Blogger Crystal Cox won a WIPO case involving several Domain Names of Top Lawyers of one of the Worlds Biggest Law Firms, Proskauer Rose, stillMarc Randazza threatens me, blogger Crystal Cox, that I if I don't turn over the Domain Name that will make him an enemy. Marc Randazza knows I have every legal and ethical right to have bought and to own Marc Randazza .com, yet Marc Randazza is teaching me a lesson by working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox to steal my Domain Names as Assets, even though a couple of months ago Marc Randazza could have bought Marc Randazza .com for $10.

Marc Randazza is a such a hypocrite as he writes about the Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh Issue and seems to be defending free speech, yet at the same time claims that she is Butthurt and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on His Watch. Yet at the Same Time Marc Randazza is trying to make Blogger Crystal Cox PAY for his Butthurt over not buying his own name as a Dotcom (DotDUMB that Was), anyway now Marc Randazza is headed to Portland Oregon for a March 23 Deposition, one in which I am sure if you check his communications records, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff's Camp to work AGAINSTCrystal Cox Blogger, and Against Free Speech.

In Marc Randazza's article regarding Sandra Fluke, Marc Randazza Said this,
"When a plaintiff alleging defamation is a public figure, he or she must show that the allegedly false statements were made with actual malice – that is, knowing falsity, or a reckless disregard for the truth. N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan" SO Marc Randazza is fully aware that in Obsidian V. Cox, Obsidian and Kevin Padrick are Public Figures and I had NO Actual Malice. Marc Randazza spoke with me and told other First Amendment Lawyers that he represented me, Blogger Crystal Cox, and claimed to have been negotiating with the Plaintiff, which was news to me. Now if Marc Randazza claims this did not happen, I am sure the other Attorneys will not lose their career in a perjured deposition to lie for Marc Randazza.

Link to the Butthurt Sandra Fluke / Marc Randazza Article
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh

I want to Sue Marc Randazza, email me at SavvyBroker@yahoo.com to represent me Pro Bono. Surely Marc Randazza has liability insurance for his yaps and threats. And isn't it illegal to act as if he represented me and try and negotiate a deal giving my private information to the Plaintiff, when he had not discussed with me, the "Alleged" Client?

Marc Randazza may flat out lie to you and say he was Subpoenad and did not contact the Plaintiff First, thing is over 6 years I have registered hundreds of "other people's names" as domain names, so why in the world would the Plaintiff Subpoena only ONE. The Truth is that Marc Randazza contacted them to make me, Blogger Crystal Cox, pay for the Marc Randazza Butthurt.

Here is the Article where Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group says that Butthurt is Butthurt, and not defamation and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on his watch.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh even though when it comes to Butthurt Marc Randazza he sure is teaching Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson in what it is to be an "enemy" of the Infamous double talking, hypocritical ASSHOLE Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza Defended Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , yet Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards.

Oh and Let's not forget the Ted Klaudt Common Law Copyright Dispute, and check out the Photo that Marc Randazza used for that article, (it is below on the left). In the Ted Klaudt case.

The Headline Reads "Former Rep Ted Klaudt claims "common law copyright" in his name to try and suppress news stories about him raping his kids".

Marc Randazza Says, "We sure do see a lot ofintellectual property abuse around here. This has to be the best one yet. Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt claims that he has a "common law copyright" in his name, and thusany news organization or other publicationthat uses his name must pay him a licensing fee of $500,000."

Yet Marc Randazza feels that he has copyright of his name. So the Name Marc Randazza is a bigger, better name than Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt's name? How does that Work? Marc Randazza is willing to take help the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to take the Domain Names of Blogger Crystal Cox in effort to hide the Secret Deals, Corruption, and Conflicts of Industry, involving Law Firms Tonkon TorpSussman Shank, Perkins Coie and Miller Nash and involving Solar Tax Credits and the Actions of Obsidian Finance Group's Kevin Padrick as a Trustee in a $40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy out of Bend Oregon. Marc Randazza is also willing to STOMP on the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of all in helping a Plaintiff that he admitted was certainly hurting Free Speech for All.

In the Ted Klaudt Scandal, Marc Randazza accuses the actions of Ted Klaudt to be simply to stop a "news organization" from informing the public. Which is exactly what I was doing. Obsidian Finance Group had no legal right to be the Trustee, neither did Kevin Padrick, as he was an insider. This case needs investigated and many were harmed and not just financially, lives were ruined. Marc Randazza will now be named in the Federal RICO Complaint I am Filing, as Well as FBI Complaints and Department of Justice Complaints. I have been investigating this story for 4 years, and Butthurt Marc Randazza is now on the side of suppressing information but taking my domain names and siding with the WRONG side First Amendment Rights.

In that Same Article Marc Randazza Says this to Ted Klaudt.
"Guess what Klaudt, you just made yourself even more famous, short eyes."
I Say This to Hypocrite Marc Randazza, "Guess What Fuckhead Marc Randazza, your working with the Bad Guys and you WILL Be even "more famous" as a thug, liar and asshole" But surely that was what you were going for.

Source information for Marc Randazza Article and Marc Randazza Case and Yammer Research

Ted Klaudt Article, Complete with Photo
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/former-rep-ted-klaudt-claims-common-law-copyright-his-name-try-and-suppress-news-stories-a

Rush Limbaugh, Sandra Fluke Research Links

http://www.easternecho.com/index.php/article/2012/03/pointcounterpoint_limbaugh_slut_scandaldebate_hijacked_by_the_left

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/09/megyn-kelly-sandra-fluke-oreilly_n_1334470.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204603004577269491399954950.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/07/patricia-heaton-s-history-of-outbursts-sandra-fluke-attack-no-anomaly.html

http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh
Marc Randazza is a LIAR when He Claims to Love the First Amendment, Marc Randazza only loves the First Amendment when it gets him a JOB.

"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" Case Research Links
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody

http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-on-wrong-side-of-free.html

Posted here by
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
aKa, Marc Randazza ENEMY
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com